- Joined
- Nov 3, 2011
- Messages
- 5,977
It's a game of odds and probabilities. Rick knows he should have a great defense this year and can make a big move with this team THIS YEAR if his QB can hit some easy passes, distribute the ball and not make a lot of dumb freshmans mistakes.
Here's the counter to that: if you're going to pare down the offense anyway, shouldn't you do it for a freshman instead of an old guy? Our best chance to win big is having a big-time QB, and this season can put Perry ahead of the curve.
It's too early to make predictions and we haven't even seen Perry. He could be way over his head. But I'm not convinced the two guys we have are necessarily safe options. They make bad mistakes, too.
This is kind of where I'm at as well, esp. re: Rosier. He's the only QB on our roster who's game-seasoned, but Richt has said over and over since last year that he makes bad mistakes in practice - I'll see if I can find it, but I distinctly remember an interview when Richt was asked about Rosier and his response was something like "we don't want a guy who'll turn a bad play into a catastrophe." Now maybe he's come a long way with his decision-making, but I think in Richt's timing-based offense, Rosier is a bit of a square peg. JMO.