Gnomes & pucks: this thread sucks

[Peter Gibbons]

So you decided to go to the "highest possible bar" after including three different measurements the first time.

I added as much context as possible in the comparison that I MADE.

You then said something stupid that only required one quick response in order to debunk.

 

[Peter Gibbons]

When you started looking at the last decade, you dropped Super Regional appearances.

I didn't look at the last decade. I refuted something stupid that you said.

 

[Peter Gibbons]

You included Super Regionals when you went back to 2003.

And I didn't have to. The point stood anyway. Take it out. No context is changed.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

Last 16 years? 8 SUPER REGIONALS!!!

Last 10 years? WE ONLY LOOK AT CWS APPEARANCES!!!

 

[Peter Gibbons]

Except that you left it out and only included Vandy.

Pathetic flailing, now.

You certainly aren't a master logician.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

I didn't look at the last decade. I refuted something stupid that you said.

Yes you did. You made a comparison between Vandy and Miami in the last decade. The only difference, though, is that you changed what you were comparing.

Three.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

And I didn't have to. The point stood anyway. Take it out. No context is changed.

But you did. It was important to you. When it killed your point (7 to 3) you dropped it.

 

[Peter Gibbons]

Last 16 years? 8 SUPER REGIONALS!!!

Last 10 years? WE ONLY LOOK AT CWS APPEARANCES!!!

When beaten, just post in all caps and contextual points.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

Pathetic flailing, now.

You certainly aren't a master logician.

That's what you write when you get beat. This was all about TCU, Vandy, and Miami. When you decided to look at the last decade's CWS appearances, TCU suddenly disappeared. Why? 5 to 2 is why.

 

[Peter Gibbons]

Yes you did. You made a comparison between Vandy and Miami in the last decade.

Nope.

Clearly refuted a point that you made.

Your condition is worsening.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

When beaten, just post in all caps and contextual points.

When beaten, change your talking points.

 

[Peter Gibbons]

When it killed your point (7 to 3) you dropped it.

You can keep repeating this until you're blue in face (and you will) and it won't make it any more accurate.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

Nope.

Clearly refuted a point that you made.

Your condition is worsening.

You don't even understand that listing Vandy and Miami is making a comparison?

 

[Peter Gibbons]

When you decided to look at the last decade's CWS appearances, TCU suddenly disappeared. Why? 5 to 2 is why.

Look, everybody.

Jagr is lying again.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

You can keep repeating this until you're blue in face (and you will) and it won't make it any more accurate.

When Super Regionals are no longer in your favor, change it to just CWS appearances......except when TCU has more CWS appearances, in which case you stop talking about TCU.

I win.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

Look, everybody.

Jagr is lying again.

How did TCU disappear between post #186 and post #192?

 

[Peter Gibbons]

You don't even understand that listing Vandy and Miami is making a comparison?

I made the one comparison earlier in the thread.

You then said something stupid and I refuted that point.

The rest of this is just your mental illness bubbling up to the surface,

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

"I'm told that their programs and teams are "stellar" not that they've achieved more impressive feats."

Then.......

"Last decade

CWS Appearances
Vandy: 3
Miami: 2"

What happened to "teams" within six posts?

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

Jagr: "Vanderbilt and TCU have certainly been stellar. Miami has not."
Piccolo: "The facts don't agree."
Jagr: "In the last decade there is no comparison."
Piccolo: "Last decade CWS Appearances Vandy: 3 Miami: 2"

How did TCU drop out of that conversation?

 

[CTCANE]

Jagr is a troll! Put him/her on ignore unless you want to argue with a Gator.