forums

Gnomes & pucks: this thread sucks

Advertisement
Why did you only compare Miami and Vandy in CWS appearances in the last decade? TCU was part of this all along.
 
Original post:

College World Series Appearances
Miami: 6
Vandy: 3

College World Series Appearances
Miami: 5
TCU: 5

Oh yeah, but what about just the last ten years?

Response:

College World Series Appearances
Miami: 2
Vandy: 3

Nothing about TCU.

So transparent.
 
Advertisement
Jaromir Jagr said:
Any comments on the Super Regional appearances? You glossed over that.
Click to expand...

By the way, I didn't gloss over it.

I just don't have to complete the loop to prove your statement wrong. You said it's not comparison over the last decade when there clearly IS a comparison with Vandy.
 
Peter Gibbons said:
My comment is that you don't care about Super Regional appearances.

If Morris had lost 4 Super Regionals you'd have killed him for it.
Click to expand...

YOU care about Super Regional appearances, so why did you only post them when they worked in your favor? It's okay. We know.
 
Peter Gibbons said:
By the way, I didn't gloss over it.

I just don't have to complete the loop to prove your statement wrong. You said it's not comparison over the last decade when there clearly IS a comparison with Vandy.
Click to expand...

You avoided Super Regional appearances because it is embarrassing to Jim's legacy that you're trying to perpetuate. You made sure to include them back when you tried to make 2003-2008 relevant.
 
Advertisement
Peter Gibbons said:
I didn't have to in order to make the point. I did because I do think they're important.

You don't which is why I laugh when you bring them up.
Click to expand...

You left them out because it killed your point. When you include ancient history, HEY LOOK AT THE SUPER REGIONALS, when you can't use 2003-2008, all of a sudden we don't hear anything about Super Regionals.
 
Jaromir Jagr said:
You left them out because it killed your point.
Click to expand...

It didn't.

You said the comparison wasn't close.

I went to the highest possible bar (CWS) and your stellar team only had one more appearance. So clearly there IS a comparison. No need to go further. You were already refuted.
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
Peter Gibbons said:
It didn't.

You said the comparison wasn't close.

I went to the highest possible bar (CWS) and your stellar team only had one more appearance. So clearly there IS a comparison. No need to go further. You were already refuted.
Click to expand...

So you decided to go to the "highest possible bar" after including three different measurements the first time.

Three Super Regionals. Sad.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top