Tears Gator Tears

[BALLHAWKU]

Turds keeping talking wait to feb did miss something ? Can't they sign now in December?

 

[plantcity3]

I said from day 1 he wasn't getting in. Jit run the streets....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Rellyrell]

The kid got arrested while on an Official Visit to Oh St...

You know how dumb you have to be to get arrested on a recruiting visit for Weed? Lmao

You know what's even more idiotic, actually thinking that a kid with that kind of decision making can actually qualify for your school.

Any coach with any amount of integrity would've just dropped him & moved on, mind you this kid had a TON of off the field red flags before he got arrested on an OV.

Silly Gaytors, so desperate for players that they're willing to take a chance on kid that clearly isn't ready to handle the responsibility of being a College athlete.

If they really cared about the kid they would make him prove that he can actually keep himself out of trouble for a semester or two in JUCO & then give him an opportunity to play.

Not only did he get arrested he tried to snitch on the whole OSU team. Kids a POS.

Yup...

Which is why it's hilarious they're trying so hard to get him in, they don't even realize that even if he qualifies that doesn't put an end to his nonsense.

He's not a kid that's going to all of the sudden turn it around, he'll keep getting trouble & will probably have questionable eligibility his entire time at UF.

Those dumb Gaytor fans better start the clock on this kid, it'll be a matter of time before he gets kicked off the team & getting kicked off UF is a special kind of stupid because Shark f*cker will give him several chances before he forced to do it, to make it look like they're "tough" on off the field issues lol.

He's a perfect fit for UFelon. I hope he gets in, robs a teammate, and then smash Mac's shark love interest on the side.

 

[RVACane]

I said from day 1 he wasn't getting in. Jit run the streets....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Someone mentioned that Blake Alderman would hold off as long as he can from pulling Robinson from their class for the sake of their 2017 rankings. This is how the back end of their class list shows on 247:



They hangin on for dear life

 

[RVACane]

By the way, the turds brag about their 2017 class being ranked higher than us but there's a major flaw in the rankings. Turdbarrel Slaton 's ranking is as the #3 guard in the country. He's not playing on the OL, he was recruited as a Nose Tackle and is playing NT. Shouldn't he be re-ranked accordingly?

 

[PanteraCanes]

I would guess Edwards is probably ranked high for being a safety but supposedly he went there because he got mad when we were talking about him as a safety. So he would need to be re-ranked as a CB too?

 

[FG305]

By the way, the turds brag about their 2017 class being ranked higher than us but there's a major flaw in the rankings. Turdbarrel Slaton 's ranking is as the #3 guard in the country. He's not playing on the OL, he was recruited as a Nose Tackle and is playing NT. Shouldn't he be re-ranked accordingly?

View attachment 46718
View attachment 46719

It might be extremely complicated re-ranking every team because position changes. All teams will have players switch positions from where they were ranked at and we will also have a few- Donaldson from OT to OG...

 

[TheOriginalCane]

By the way, the turds brag about their 2017 class being ranked higher than us but there's a major flaw in the rankings. Turdbarrel Slaton 's ranking is as the #3 guard in the country. He's not playing on the OL, he was recruited as a Nose Tackle and is playing NT. Shouldn't he be re-ranked accordingly?

View attachment 46718
View attachment 46719

It might be extremely complicated re-ranking every team because position changes. All teams will have players switch positions from where they were ranked at and we will also have a few- Donaldson from OT to OG...

Give me a ******* break.

****-barrel was talking about a position shift DURING recruiting. Said he did NOT want to be recruited as an OL. Switched to DEFENSE.

That is MUCH much different than moving from OT to OG.

 

[FG305]

By the way, the turds brag about their 2017 class being ranked higher than us but there's a major flaw in the rankings. Turdbarrel Slaton 's ranking is as the #3 guard in the country. He's not playing on the OL, he was recruited as a Nose Tackle and is playing NT. Shouldn't he be re-ranked accordingly?

View attachment 46718
View attachment 46719

It might be extremely complicated re-ranking every team because position changes. All teams will have players switch positions from where they were ranked at and we will also have a few- Donaldson from OT to OG...

Give me a ******* break.

****-barrel was talking about a position shift DURING recruiting. Said he did NOT want to be recruited as an OL. Switched to DEFENSE.

That is MUCH much different than moving from OT to OG.

Sites just aren't going to spend the time re-ranking teams because of position changes. There's way too many of them. Norton is another example- He clearly stated during his recruitment that we were going to play him at DT but was still ranked as an OG.

Just pointing out that recruiting sites constantly evaluate players at the wrong positions but will never make adjustments after sighing day.

 

[RedSquare]

LOL @ fire the people in admissions

Gaytor fans are buffoons.

That's WHY a University President hires an Admissions Office. So that THEY can be the hatchet men and women. So that NOBODY can influence Admissions decisions. He's not going to fire anyone WHO IS DOING EXACTLY WHAT HE HIRED THEM TO DO.

On top of it, and it's been mentioned, this seems to be an NCAA clearinghouse/UAA issue. Their admissions people probably aren't even driving this.

I have had this conversation with some folks previously.

There are two decision makers once you get beyond "GPA" and "SAT".

One is the Clearinghouse, with "core course" issues.

The other is any University Admissions, but with issues about placement, and how many "non-major" classes will need to be taken by a student just to EVENTUALLY get to the classes required in one's major. Why is this important? ACADEMIC PROGRESS.

Allow me to explain. When I was tutoring Horace Copeland in his Prop 48 year, he had to take an Algebra II/Trig type math course BEFORE he ever got to Calculus. Keep in mind, many athletes are business majors, and the ONLY math class in the major is Business Calculus. That means, if they do not have enough HS progress to be ready to take Calc, they have to take remedial courses that DO NOT COUNT TOWARDS THE MAJOR AND DO NOT COUNT TOWARDS ACADEMIC PROGRESS. Imagine if you took the UM course "History of Rock Music" (I did) and you didn't have any electives left. That course would NOT count towards academic progress.

Thus, if a student needs remedial English, remedial math, remedial EVERYTHING, that means he/she will make little to no academic progress as a freshman, and may be unlikely to ever graduate. Thus schools don't want to take a chance with kids who are too far behind to even get started at the college level courses.

From what people say of Robinson, he could EASILY fit this bill.

great explanation. thanks for that.

it's one of the reasons that these dumbasses choose SEC type schools. They have garbage majors where the gap from their remedial standards to major courses is minimal or nonexistent. anyone know how many guys from SEC schools major in things like "tourism" and "physical education"? it's a lot. and that is why the TV networks stopped mentioning major courses of study during the broadcasts. all the public universities like UF, FSU, AUB, PSU, WVa, etc. were mortified that a bunch of illiterates were showing on screen as being "Home Health" majors, so they pressured the networks to stop talking about it.

 

[TheOriginalCane]

By the way, the turds brag about their 2017 class being ranked higher than us but there's a major flaw in the rankings. Turdbarrel Slaton 's ranking is as the #3 guard in the country. He's not playing on the OL, he was recruited as a Nose Tackle and is playing NT. Shouldn't he be re-ranked accordingly?

View attachment 46718
View attachment 46719

It might be extremely complicated re-ranking every team because position changes. All teams will have players switch positions from where they were ranked at and we will also have a few- Donaldson from OT to OG...

Give me a ****ing break.

****-barrel was talking about a position shift DURING recruiting. Said he did NOT want to be recruited as an OL. Switched to DEFENSE.

That is MUCH much different than moving from OT to OG.

Sites just aren't going to spend the time re-ranking teams because of position changes. There's way too many of them. Norton is another example- He clearly stated during his recruitment that we were going to play him at DT but was still ranked as an OG.

Just pointing out that recruiting sites constantly evaluate players at the wrong positions but will never make adjustments after sighing day.

I don't disagree with you that sites won't do it, but the original point is valid, in that one of UF's highest rated recruits did not even want to be recruited for the position at which he was evaluated. THAT is not common. Nobody disputes that position changes happen, but a 5-star RB is not a 5-star QB, simply because he wants to "change positions" immediately.

I DO think that sites should take it into account when a player states that he refuses to be recruited by schools wanting to use him in his evaluated role. In that case, the kid should be re-evaluated. After all, if it happens, then the kid has usually played more than one position, and there should be tape of him doing so.

It won't be a frequent occurrence, I guarantee you. There are some kids who are evaluated as ATHLETES because they play multiple positions. So if a fvcknut like ****-barrel wants to give up on the position that has attained him such a lofty ranking, then he should be evaluated at the position that he claims to want to play to the exclusion of all others. And if ****-barrel isn't a Top 500 player at defensive line, then those are the repercussions of his decision.

As for your position about sites "constantly" evaluating players at the wrong position, that is just nonsense. Yes, there are kids who play QB who are not projected to do so at the next level, but players ARE evaluated at their projected positions if there is tape, if there is performance, if there are camps, etc. where they are seen playing that position.

Again, you are confusing subsequent collegiate level position changes with a kid who spent 25% of his high school career telling anyone who would listen that he would NOT play offensive line at the collegiate level, and yet he was evaluated as an offensive lineman.

Keep in mind, that the way sites use "stars" is supposed to correspond to how heavily kids are recruited. A 3-star kid is not being recruited on the same level as a 5-star kid. And there were MULTIPLE schools who did not want "high 4-star OG" ****-barrel to play defensive line. That is not the same thing as Norton, who was a 3-star who could have played either position and was not markedly better at one than the other.

THAT is the essence of the mischaracterization. NOBODY had ****-barrel rated as a Rivals 100 DEFENSIVE LINEMAN, even though he played both ways.

 

[DTP]

This is one of the reasons I don't go crazy over class rankings. Golden always loaded up on highly ranked kids that were never going to be able to enroll due to grades or character issues just to say "we have the 18th ranked recruiting class". If 1/3 of your recruits don't qualify or get kicked out, that ranking is worthless.

 

[RVACane]

By the way, the turds brag about their 2017 class being ranked higher than us but there's a major flaw in the rankings. Turdbarrel Slaton 's ranking is as the #3 guard in the country. He's not playing on the OL, he was recruited as a Nose Tackle and is playing NT. Shouldn't he be re-ranked accordingly?

View attachment 46718
View attachment 46719

It might be extremely complicated re-ranking every team because position changes. All teams will have players switch positions from where they were ranked at and we will also have a few- Donaldson from OT to OG...

Give me a ****ing break.

****-barrel was talking about a position shift DURING recruiting. Said he did NOT want to be recruited as an OL. Switched to DEFENSE.

That is MUCH much different than moving from OT to OG.

Sites just aren't going to spend the time re-ranking teams because of position changes. There's way too many of them. Norton is another example- He clearly stated during his recruitment that we were going to play him at DT but was still ranked as an OG.

Just pointing out that recruiting sites constantly evaluate players at the wrong positions but will never make adjustments after sighing day.

I don't disagree with you that sites won't do it, but the original point is valid, in that one of UF's highest rated recruits did not even want to be recruited for the position at which he was evaluated. THAT is not common. Nobody disputes that position changes happen, but a 5-star RB is not a 5-star QB, simply because he wants to "change positions" immediately.

I DO think that sites should take it into account when a player states that he refuses to be recruited by schools wanting to use him in his evaluated role. In that case, the kid should be re-evaluated. After all, if it happens, then the kid has usually played more than one position, and there should be tape of him doing so.

It won't be a frequent occurrence, I guarantee you. There are some kids who are evaluated as ATHLETES because they play multiple positions. So if a fvcknut like ****-barrel wants to give up on the position that has attained him such a lofty ranking, then he should be evaluated at the position that he claims to want to play to the exclusion of all others. And if ****-barrel isn't a Top 500 player at defensive line, then those are the repercussions of his decision.

As for your position about sites "constantly" evaluating players at the wrong position, that is just nonsense. Yes, there are kids who play QB who are not projected to do so at the next level, but players ARE evaluated at their projected positions if there is tape, if there is performance, if there are camps, etc. where they are seen playing that position.

Again, you are confusing subsequent collegiate level position changes with a kid who spent 25% of his high school career telling anyone who would listen that he would NOT play offensive line at the collegiate level, and yet he was evaluated as an offensive lineman.

Keep in mind, that the way sites use "stars" is supposed to correspond to how heavily kids are recruited. A 3-star kid is not being recruited on the same level as a 5-star kid. And there were MULTIPLE schools who did not want "high 4-star OG" ****-barrel to play defensive line. That is not the same thing as Norton, who was a 3-star who could have played either position and was not markedly better at one than the other.

THAT is the essence of the mischaracterization. NOBODY had ****-barrel rated as a Rivals 100 DEFENSIVE LINEMAN, even though he played both ways.

You've summed up my position better than I could have. I think the same logic applies to Tyreke Johnson to some extent. If we go past the argument that he blossomed too early and just assume he's a 5 star talent, I think that rating is at Safety but he insists that he's a Cornerback. He's not a 5 star corner though. In turdbarrel's case it's even worse because he's going from OG to DT.

Anyhow, it was just an observation I had when I looked at their class and saw a guy with a 96% grade as a guard who was coming in as a DT. If he wanted to be a guard my recollection is that he probably would've come to UM.

 

[BALLHAWKU]

What new

 

[M3N]

Time out... gaytors signed Lancedrick Brunson?! Is that the crazy tow truck lady's kid ? Hahaha of that ain't the biggest Randy Shannon move of all time

 

[Oicu812]

As I don't follow any college teams but ours, I have to ask. Do the turds have any commits at the opening?... (Other than any of our 10 they seem to think they can flip)

 

[RVACane]

As I don't follow any college teams but ours, I have to ask. Do the turds have any commits at the opening?... (Other than any of our 10 they seem to think they can flip)

Nope, not that I'm aware of. There's a good chance that this TE, Kyle Pitts, commits to them next week and he's there. They also have some supposed leans there but that's it. No one they can point to and see "Florida" attached to the name. Gotta love it.

 

[RedSquare]

It might be extremely complicated re-ranking every team because position changes. All teams will have players switch positions from where they were ranked at and we will also have a few- Donaldson from OT to OG...

Give me a ****ing break.

****-barrel was talking about a position shift DURING recruiting. Said he did NOT want to be recruited as an OL. Switched to DEFENSE.

That is MUCH much different than moving from OT to OG.

Sites just aren't going to spend the time re-ranking teams because of position changes. There's way too many of them. Norton is another example- He clearly stated during his recruitment that we were going to play him at DT but was still ranked as an OG.

Just pointing out that recruiting sites constantly evaluate players at the wrong positions but will never make adjustments after sighing day.

I don't disagree with you that sites won't do it, but the original point is valid, in that one of UF's highest rated recruits did not even want to be recruited for the position at which he was evaluated. THAT is not common. Nobody disputes that position changes happen, but a 5-star RB is not a 5-star QB, simply because he wants to "change positions" immediately.

I DO think that sites should take it into account when a player states that he refuses to be recruited by schools wanting to use him in his evaluated role. In that case, the kid should be re-evaluated. After all, if it happens, then the kid has usually played more than one position, and there should be tape of him doing so.

It won't be a frequent occurrence, I guarantee you. There are some kids who are evaluated as ATHLETES because they play multiple positions. So if a fvcknut like ****-barrel wants to give up on the position that has attained him such a lofty ranking, then he should be evaluated at the position that he claims to want to play to the exclusion of all others. And if ****-barrel isn't a Top 500 player at defensive line, then those are the repercussions of his decision.

As for your position about sites "constantly" evaluating players at the wrong position, that is just nonsense. Yes, there are kids who play QB who are not projected to do so at the next level, but players ARE evaluated at their projected positions if there is tape, if there is performance, if there are camps, etc. where they are seen playing that position.

Again, you are confusing subsequent collegiate level position changes with a kid who spent 25% of his high school career telling anyone who would listen that he would NOT play offensive line at the collegiate level, and yet he was evaluated as an offensive lineman.

Keep in mind, that the way sites use "stars" is supposed to correspond to how heavily kids are recruited. A 3-star kid is not being recruited on the same level as a 5-star kid. And there were MULTIPLE schools who did not want "high 4-star OG" ****-barrel to play defensive line. That is not the same thing as Norton, who was a 3-star who could have played either position and was not markedly better at one than the other.

THAT is the essence of the mischaracterization. NOBODY had ****-barrel rated as a Rivals 100 DEFENSIVE LINEMAN, even though he played both ways.

You've summed up my position better than I could have. I think the same logic applies to Tyreke Johnson to some extent. If we go past the argument that he blossomed too early and just assume he's a 5 star talent, I think that rating is at Safety but he insists that he's a Cornerback. He's not a 5 star corner though. In turdbarrel's case it's even worse because he's going from OG to DT.

Anyhow, it was just an observation I had when I looked at their class and saw a guy with a 96% grade as a guard who was coming in as a DT. If he wanted to be a guard my recollection is that he probably would've come to UM.

actually, it raises the question: How did fatso get a 4 star rating at ANY position?

 

[Canes2082]

As I don't follow any college teams but ours, I have to ask. Do the turds have any commits at the opening?... (Other than any of our 10 they seem to think they can flip)

Nope, not that I'm aware of. There's a good chance that this TE, Kyle Pitts, commits to them next week and he's there. They also have some supposed leans there but that's it. No one they can point to and see "Florida" attached to the name. Gotta love it.

It ****es them off too because we have 10 guys there hanging out and recruiting for us but somehow they think they'll flip to Fla lmao

 

[RVACane]

As I don't follow any college teams but ours, I have to ask. Do the turds have any commits at the opening?... (Other than any of our 10 they seem to think they can flip)

Nope, not that I'm aware of. There's a good chance that this TE, Kyle Pitts, commits to them next week and he's there. They also have some supposed leans there but that's it. No one they can point to and see "Florida" attached to the name. Gotta love it.

It ****es them off too because we have 10 guys there hanging out and recruiting for us but somehow they think they'll flip to Fla lmao

Is it being talked about in any of the VIP threads? Yesterday there was a combined thread for Day 1 updates and the Canes started hammering the turds. Needless to say 247 went and deleted about 100 comments in the thread. There was one Cane who asked 247 to have a combined thread for FNL and Paradise when it's happening (so we can pound them.).