From the Perch: LSU

[LPK2006]

I am not a QB expert by any stretch, but I've come to realize that there's something that bothers me about Rosier's footwork and release. I can't put my thumb on it, but he just looks awkward and shaky back there. I understand he's doing his best, but man, he's just not very good.

 

[txcanes]

Dude, thats a whole lot of words and fancy pictures, just to say what we all already know, "Rosier sucks."

Hopefully Richt starts someone else next week and you can give us a breakdown that actually means something.

This was a great breakdown and if you dont appreciate it, keep quiet. No respect to the guy for good work, no excuse for that.

 

[g8rh8rMD]

This was a great breakdown and if you dont appreciate it, keep quiet. No respect to the guy for good work, no excuse for that.

Man, some people just don't have working sarcasm detectors. Relax bro, @fivecent was just trying to be funny at a difficult time.

@txcanes, appreciate you as a poster man, so don't take this the wrong way, and please understand it's not personal, just using your post as an example.

I don't get the apparent need some feel on here to cape up for the writing staff every time someone criticizes or makes a poor attempt at humor about something they wrote. These dudes are grown *** men who put their pants on one leg at a time, just like the rest of us. Well, most of the rest of us, I know @brock puts his skirt on both legs at a time (jk, Brock, love you man, just making a point). Point being, these dudes deserve our appreciation and respect if we like what they do, but they're also not a bunch of pvssies who are going to climb into a closet and sob because some internet jackass made a bad joke at their expense. I'm not down with posters taking personal shots at our writers, or being out of line, but dude was just being sarcastic here in his attempt to actually show appreciation for the writer, and is getting told to shut up. C'mon man.

Stop being so ******* sensitive. CIS is a message board, not a cot**** cult.


PS - Fvck Malik Rosier and Fvck Jon Richt. That is likely all I shall have to say this week.

 

[pacusmc]

“Malik Rosier is not a good enough quarterback in my opinion to make Mark Richt look good as a play caller. Inversely, Mark Richt is not a good enough play caller to make Malik Rosier look good as a quarterback.”

CIS *****ing for the past year brilliantly put in one sentence.
CMR is the leader and the most important thing a leader needs to know right off the bat is “know where your are weak at”

 

[Roman Marciante]

Perry might be more accurate and more dynamic than Rosier, but he appears in the doghouse. Weldon's ability is uncertain. Williams received accolades during the spring, but lacks experience. But, how do you gain experience if coach does not play you? I would start one of the backups next week, preferably Perry if his disciplinary problem is resolved. If Weldon or Williams is the most accurate, I would accept one of them starting. The season is not lost. A relatively easy schedule can still put UM in the ACC Championship game, and with a season of experience for one of the backups, the team might even surprise Clemson.

The OL was not as dismal as many feared it would be. The OL wasn't dominant, but there were occasions when Rosier had time to make accurate passes and he failed. Everyone saw these flaws at the end of last year. He fails to make the right read or misses open receivers. The first flaw might be correctable, but an off-season of preparation does not seem to have improved his reads. As for the second flaw, many football people say that you can't teach accuracy; you either have it or you don't.

I know it is a QB thread, but can someone please replace Feagles?

Feagles

Man, some people just don't have working sarcasm detectors. Relax bro, @fivecent was just trying to be funny at a difficult time.

@txcanes, appreciate you as a poster man, so don't take this the wrong way, and please understand it's not personal, just using your post as an example.

I don't get the apparent need some feel on here to cape up for the writing staff every time someone criticizes or makes a poor attempt at humor about something they wrote. These dudes are grown *** men who put their pants on one leg at a time, just like the rest of us. Well, most of the rest of us, I know @brock puts his skirt on both legs at a time (jk, Brock, love you man, just making a point). Point being, these dudes deserve our appreciation and respect if we like what they do, but they're also not a bunch of pvssies who are going to climb into a closet and sob because some internet jackass made a bad joke at their expense. I'm not down with posters taking personal shots at our writers, or being out of line, but dude was just being sarcastic here in his attempt to actually show appreciation for the writer, and is getting told to shut up. C'mon man.

Stop being so ******* sensitive. CIS is a message board, not a cot**** cult.


PS - Fvck Malik Rosier and Fvck Jon Richt. That is likely all I shall have to say this week.

I'll chime in. I did take that initial comment as light hearted and funny. (Was some really funny comments throughout the thread too) But agreed, I have my big boy pants. No one gets criticized more than a quarterback.

So it is only right that if I am going to be analytical and focus on them, that I too should be able to take justified criticism.

Can't dish out and not take. I'm a big student of the game and I learn every day. No expert. Just one of you guys. All good boys.

 

[freeman84]

Great write-up I look forward to the next one. Instead of just stating that Richt and rosier sucked you backed it up with with the breakdowns. I don’t think that **** poor play calling will help anyone but rosier is terrible he’s got to get better.

 

[Roman Marciante]

“Malik Rosier is not a good enough quarterback in my opinion to make Mark Richt look good as a play caller. Inversely, Mark Richt is not a good enough play caller to make Malik Rosier look good as a quarterback.”

CIS *****ing for the past year brilliantly put in one sentence.
CMR is the leader and the most important thing a leader needs to know right off the bat is “know where your are weak at”

Thank you for the shout out. You know over the years I've just learned when the greatest debates include hard line opposite stances, the truth often lies in the middle.

This is one where I firmly believe both parties are at fault.

 

[RedSquare]

Every week, InSight is committed to bringing you film breakdown and commentary from the week before. From the Perch is a quarterback's perspective on what was seen and maybe unseen. We have highlights and low lights as we show some quick video clips (click click). And we definitely picked a great week to start the series (sarcasm font). To put it mildly, Malik Rosier was not up to par in his 2018 opening night. Rosier was 15/35 (42.9%) for 259 yards with one touchdown and two interceptions.

In this current four game losing streak dating back to last year, Rosier has had completion % totals of 41, 48, 42, and 42. Rosier's accuracy has been a hot topic and here you see an example of inaccuracy even through completion. Recently, I was asked about my expectations for Rosier on the InSight round table and I did not pull punches. I wanted to see Rosier not limit after the catch potential. Now, this isn't a throw where Jeff Thomas can run to daylight, but the premise is the same. Rosier often limits his wide receiver's ability with poorly placed balls.

In football, it is a lot more efficient to leave the acrobatics for the gymnasts. Thomas gets a gold medal for body contortion. Note that Rosier has time and a relatively clean pocket. This is when quarterbacks should be the most accurate when delivering the football; however this is not the case here.



Momentum was completely in LSU's favor and the tide forever shifted after Rosier's first interception. A costly pick six that had a reverse haunting resemblance to Trajan Bandy's pick six a year ago vs Notre Dame. Both, if you recall, were on slant routes. Miami lines up in a 3x1 set with the trips set to the field side. This is 11 set personnel with Brevin Jordan in at Y. The route combo trips side is a Z stop by Cager, slot slant by Thomas, and a Y drag by Jordan.

Of note, there is a boundary corner blitz that is not picked up here by Rosier (I do not think it affected the play for his read goes field side first). I thought throughout the game, LSU had some really timely blitzes as you will see later on in this breakdown. The ball is tipped, but essentially Richt alluded that it was not the right read and wouldn't have mattered in his post game press conference. I agree on all counts.

The Linebacker drops perfectly here for the pick. Rosier does not see the drop defender and that is all the recipe you need for a defensive house call. The right read here is the Z stop by Cager at the top of the screen. Cager has enough cushion underneath the #1 DB. However, one thing I do not like from a tactical standpoint is how the #2 DB is able to leverage both the Z and slot receivers from his pre-snap positioning. If the Canes would adopt a more spread friendly premise, you could push Cager just outside the numbers and it would create more spacial conflict for the defenders.

Ultimately, some offensive coordinators like to keep the whole route tree open, but from a widened split, the X/Z receiver can simplify the reads for a QB. Many teams have adopted wider receiver splits. It also helps identify blitzers better. At this point, does it hurt to try simplifying reads for Rosier?




Rosier's second interception is in fact a time LSU's defensive coordinator Dave Aranda brought a perfectly timed blitz that caused havoc. This nickel corner blitz comes as Miami left tackle Tyree St Louis struggles to kick out on a speedy defender. Ultimately, the nickel crashes into Rosier causing him to throw an errant pass, which is picked off. Now, the first instinct is to blame St. Louis, and by no means is he off the hook here. But, **** that blitz was so perfectly timed and that was a hard reach for the LT to make.

Miami needs to vary their silent snap cadence like yesterday. It is too easy to rhythmically maneuver against. Ultimately, if Rosier was able to catch this pre-snap, a slight adjusted hot read to Mike Harley in the slot would have been the easy pitch and catch. Harley is actually trying to signal Rosier that the blitz is coming, but once again, Rosier does not see it. Also note that LSU is looking to be in a two deep shell; however, the safety aligning directly over the top of Harley tips off that a blitz is coming. It does. LSU jumps into man and the rest is a wrap.



Here is an example of a quarterback predetermined. I understand Thomas is the fastest man on the field, but so does everyone else. This is a mirrored post/wheel concept that Thomas drives on the wheel from the slot. Rosier essentially stares at Thomas the whole way and you note the safety is crashing in exceptionally hot on the play. Also, you note that the primary DB in man coverage actually out leveraged Thomas here. This is more lucky than good. The DB inexplicably gets lost and the safety ultimately factors.

In this instance of a post wheel combo, I would like to see a quarterback/wide receiver combo throttle that wheel into a stop if the DB was out-leveraging you by that margin. Why force it down field when they aren't letting you do so? There was no underneath route competing on this mirrored concept and I think it's the safer and more efficient play. That would involve two players being on the same page.



And, finally, we will end on an Mark Richt staple. All verticals. This is actually good quarterbacking from start to finish. And unlike the last play where Rosier is simply staring down his receiver like a kid stares at his first nude centerfold, Rosier actually opens up eyes to center. This keeps the safety in the middle of the field like a good boy and he delivers a perfectly thrown ball to Brian Hightower.

This is a 50/50 ball and it takes Rosier to have a clean pocket, good blocking, and a perfectly thrown ball to be efficient. This is where Richt needs look into the mirror and realize how many times we have seen this concept run. LSU has it well covered. I'd make the case they expected the play call. Ultimately the reality is this: Malik Rosier is not a good enough quarterback in my opinion to make Mark Richt look good as a play caller. Inversely, Mark Richt is not a good enough play caller to make Malik Rosier look good as a quarterback.



Miami bounces back next week and wins resoundingly, but ultimately this is the blue print. Until there is a change at quarterback or a philosophical movement from the offensive coordinator, nothing will change vs. higher echelon defensive teams. The next few games provide no real barometer for progress considering the competition. Please be on the look out for my partner in crime Lance (Vision) with his upcoming full LSU game breakdown. They are legendary. X's and O's, yeah we got you covered.

And this is indicative of a coaching point that was always hammered into me throughout my college career: "at the snap, always find the pink elephant under the goalpost!" The coaching point? You can look around pre-snap all you need to, but EVERY time at the start of the play, you reset your head and eyes right down the middle of the field, so that the back seven never get an immediate jump on where your first read is. It always looks like to them when the ball is snapped, you're starting from the same position: staring at the goalposts.

Why the **** this isn't pounded into Rosier's head, I just don't know.

 

[Dwinstitles]

So I guess we found out Malik sucks which we all know except the coaches for some reason

 

[Brains]

I think starting Rosier the next 3 games proves nothing. Vs higher echelon teams you see what the marriage between Richt and Rosier gives you. Less than 50% accuracy in the four straight losses. On a podcast with D$ he asked me point blank. Do you think Rosier remains the starter at the end of the year. I firmly said no. It was based on the fact that their was too many rigid parts at play.

I didn't see or hear anything in the off season that said the offense had a complete overhaul. Yesterday's game kind of confirmed the obvious. But Rosier isn't the refined accurate passer needed to operate this offense. And I am not impressed with his field reading abilities on the whole.

You MUST get some other quarterbacks looks this year. You simply have to see how they respond when the bullets fly. You might have a gamer in the midst, you might not. But cue Yoda. Do or do not, there is no try.

Excellent breakdown.

Although O-Line play is weak, there were enough instances where pass pro was not that bad. Enough instances, in fact, to win the game with a QB who makes competent throws. Unfortunately, even when pass pro was decent, Rosier:

1) Skies it;
2) Throws it into the ground;
3) Does not move laterally in the pocket properly;
4) Does not move vertically in the pocket properly;
5) Rolls out frequently to his non-dominant LEFT hand side.

It is too late in the game to expect for so much to change. A new QB is needed now.