Formation and Personnel Groups you'd like to see this season

The strength of the UM offense is the upfront troops. Depth-wise, the receiving unit on paper is as deep as I can remember seeing at UM, so it would make sense that they become the focal point offensively. Here is where coach Coley can create match up problems and dictate coverages, which also helps SMorris get a better feel in both pre-snap and post snap reads.

The ace formation is often referred to as an inflated scheme between the twenties. It's difficult to contain between the twenties, particularly if the offense has an outstanding duo at tightend and slot receiver. They set the tempo and are chain movers. To be honest, I'm not sure we have a "player" at tightend in the traditional Miami mode unless BSandland emerges as that type. Still, though, I think SColey could be an absolute monster at the slot position. This kid working against a nickle back, linebacker or safety would be murder. With Dorsett's speed on the outside, Coley would become the vital cog in a machine that could be as explosive any UM offense in recent memory. When factoring in DJohnson's explosiveness and game-changing ability, the possibilities of this type of offensive structure are mind-boggling. Everything being led of course by Kehoe's big boys upfront.

Power football. The Joe Gibbs approach. Balancing out those eight man fronts UM will likely face in an attempt to pressure Morris in the passing game and stuff Johnson and the ground game. To counter the pressure looks and loaded defensive fronts, UM has enough depth at tightend to be physical at the point of attack. In the running game, the counter tre becomes a viable option again, particularly when motioning one of the tightends. In the passing game against an upfront scheme there is instant help for the offensive tackles. This would give Morris time to look deep downfield for those post/dig combination routes. Again, factoring in DJohnson releasing into space after checking blocking assignment is a mismatch.

The traditional Miami I formations would be used within the twenties and on short yardage situations. I personally like I-form twins because of the coverage it dictates. In addition, playaction to the strong side is where I would prefer to attack, the spider concepts.

This offensive structure provides balance while creating mismatches. It also gives you the ability to play power and finesse football at the point of attack.

I'll get to the 3-3-5 defense later.

Plus, Miami can get deep with Waters and Scott, who are long and quick. Running combo routes with Dorsett and Coley will be fun to watch. Not a huge fan of the 3-3-5 unless you have absolutely 3 studs on your front.
 
Advertisement
This can only work on 1st down...

Punt formation. O'Donnell deep to receive snap with his 9 second hang time and 50 yard punts. Gunners are Denzel Perryman on the strong side and Deon Bush/Jamal Carter (yes its worth burning his shirt for this) opposite. O'Donnell punts + carnage 50 yards down the field = profit.
 
I want to see Duke Johnson peeling out of the backfield on wheel routes, isolated on a LB. I used to love watching them sneak the Davenport up the middle on a PA pass and then hitting him as he ran past the LB's.
 
Agree about Duke running wheel routes. Also would like him to run a lot of angle routes and get him the ball once he's already moving. Use him like SC used Bush.

I don't think he was ready for that last year.
 
Morris missed Duke on 1-2 beautifully called wheel routes last year. Duke dropped a few easy passes, too. Should be a good test of Morris' touch and Duke's improved concentration this year.
 
Advertisement
Morris missed Duke on 1-2 beautifully called wheel routes last year. Duke dropped a few easy passes, too. Should be a good test of Morris' touch and Duke's improved concentration this year.

Agreed.

I think Duke had open field to go for 6 on that slant he dropped against KSU early
 
Last edited:
Count me in on the unbalanced line crowd.


Put Bunche next to Seantrel or Flowers, whichever is on the long side of the field.


Hand the ball to Duke.


Profit.
 
OL:
LT Flowers
LG Bunche
C Mcdermott
RG Linder
RT Henderson

QB:
Morris

RB:
Duke

WRs:

Scott (wide)
Coley (wide)
Dorsett (Slot)
Lewis (Slot)

Objective: uhhh I think we all know what the objective would be. Score a fuggin TD.
 
Advertisement
7 - McCord
1 - Robinson
3 - Chick
9 - AQM

Grace/Perryman at backer, Gunter/Tracy/Jenkins cover 3, Crawford/Bush underneath with the backers. 3rd and long, let the DL go to work, try to force a mistake in the secondary.
 
I'd like to see some spread sets to run some wr screens to get our speed guys out in space. I like getting Dorsett, Scott, Lewis, coley, duke and whoever else the ball in space to make plays. It would also help open up the vertical passing game.
 
Advertisement
I wouldn't mind seeing us run a formation called "bunch far".

It's basically "quads" on one side. You got 3 WR's in a bunch formation to the right, condensed down, a couple yards away from the tackle. Then all the way outside, near the sideline, you have a single WR, split way outside (that's your "quads" i.e 4 WR's to that side)

Then on the backside (left in this case) you have your best WR singled up.

As a DC I can tell you first hand that "bunch" can be a ***** to deal with at times. Now imagine bunch with ANOTHER WR split outside of it.

You can even use Duke as the #4 WR to that side, basically the #3 WR in the bunch, closest to the tackle. From there he can motion into the backfield and now we're in the trips formation.

It can be a *****. Alot of times you'll get a one-on-one match-up that you can exploit on that single WR side.


98.gif


Instead of having a RB, put another WR outside of the bunch where the '50' is.
 
Last edited:
anything that includes Figs, Kirby, Perryman at LB......Gunter, Howard, Bush, Jenkins

Dats what I wanna SEE!
 
Advertisement
I want to see some Coker-T!!!

( Uh, no, I don't, never mind)

Coker T worked when we had studs at literally every position. That 2000 offense of his was a juggernaut


Coker-T was used mostly in 99 because Kenny Kelly simply couldn't run the whole offense and it had limited effectiveness vs the good teams. By 2000, with Dorsey under center, Coker-T wasn't used nearly as much...
 
I'd like to see us play a Buddy Ryan style Bear defense. Send however many it takes to put the opposing quarterback down.
If it takes an 11 man blitz so be it.
Better a quick td against us then the death of a thousand cuts.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top