Evolution of the Miami Hurricane Fanbase (Offensive Philosop

I like being a multiple offense, just like I enjoy us trying to be a multiple defense (but as was addressed in the OP...that's another thread, altogether).

Being a player in college in multiple offensive sets will prepare you for the NFL much better than just being a guy who's run nothing but spread concepts in HS and College. So, while we need to utilize some spread concepts, I think we need to hang on to having multiple sets, and running pro-style concepts out of it.

Offense is not that hard if you can run the football. Doesn't matter how you do it, really, but you need to establish the run. Once you do that, all of the playaction (out of any set) opens up guys downfield. Now...the other approach if you're not running the ball well is to establish a pseudo-running game with the short passing game. Go up-tempo, start hitting the short slant/curl/shake routes or some screens, and move the chains 4-5 yards at a time. Doing that effectively sets up playaction w/double-moves on the routes, and guys can take the top off of the D a lot easier. The 2nd approach is what you saw New England/Denver do quite a bit of throughout the season, but they can both attack defenses with either philosophy.

The problem used to be that you couldn't find S. Florida QB's that were accurate enough to hit those short routes with the precision that you need to have to keep the chains moving. Now, you're starting to see more and more S. Florida QB's who are much more developed at the position than, say, 8 years ago.

However, one thing that is missing in this whole thing is the time and repetition that it takes to get all of the checks and audibles in place that guys like Manning/Brady use to run their offenses. And don't get it twisted...they have OC's on staff in Denver/New England, but the ones calling the plays are Manning/Brady...because there may be a set play called...but they know that they can audible to just about anything they want, depending upon the personnel grouping on the field. I don't think the time, reps, and preparation are there on the collegiate level for the most part due to immaturity and being a student on top of being an elite athlete.
 
Advertisement
100.jpg
 
The scheme doesnt matter as much as player development depth and execution.Bama dominates and runs a pro style FSU just broke scoring records with pro style. Not all teams need to go Oregon route to field good offenses
 
The scheme doesnt matter as much as player development depth and execution.Bama dominates and runs a pro style FSU just broke scoring records with pro style. Not all teams need to go Oregon route to field good offenses

a great defense is needed....
 
I just don't want read option, QB running all the time offense.. That's not the brand of football I want to see here.. Other than that, I don't care what they do. Put up points. That's it.

Why not?

I can see his point. It would just be weird. Miami, as we know them, has always been a program that runs current (at the time) pro style everything; even back in 1983 when we ran a split back offense and a 50 slant defense.

Personally I think what Gus Malzahn is doing is awesome, but that's a whole other conversation, lol.
Miami has always been a program that ran a 1 gapping 4-3. Why is that an argument for offense but not the defense?

As for the OP, yeah I followed a similar progression. I used to be of the mindset that I wanted a certain offense, but now I just want to score. If that means spread-option let's do it. If that means 5 wide sets, let's do it.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
I just don't want read option, QB running all the time offense.. That's not the brand of football I want to see here.. Other than that, I don't care what they do. Put up points. That's it.

Why not?

I can see his point. It would just be weird. Miami, as we know them, has always been a program that runs current (at the time) pro style everything; even back in 1983 when we ran a split back offense and a 50 slant defense.

Personally I think what Gus Malzahn is doing is awesome, but that's a whole other conversation, lol.
Miami has always been a program that ran a 1 gapping 4-3. Why is that an argument for offense but not the defense?

Wrong again. We ran a one gap 52 slant in 1983. Read your history.
 
I just don't want read option, QB running all the time offense.. That's not the brand of football I want to see here.. Other than that, I don't care what they do. Put up points. That's it.

Why not?

I can see his point. It would just be weird. Miami, as we know them, has always been a program that runs current (at the time) pro style everything; even back in 1983 when we ran a split back offense and a 50 slant defense.

Personally I think what Gus Malzahn is doing is awesome, but that's a whole other conversation, lol.
Miami has always been a program that ran a 1 gapping 4-3. Why is that an argument for offense but not the defense?

Wrong again. We ran a one gap 52 slant in 1983. Read your history.
Oh ok. So if we ran the 1 gapping 4-3 in '83, your argument would change? '83 is the difference in always doing it that way? 1 year?
 

I can see his point. It would just be weird. Miami, as we know them, has always been a program that runs current (at the time) pro style everything; even back in 1983 when we ran a split back offense and a 50 slant defense.

Personally I think what Gus Malzahn is doing is awesome, but that's a whole other conversation, lol.
Miami has always been a program that ran a 1 gapping 4-3. Why is that an argument for offense but not the defense?

Wrong again. We ran a one gap 52 slant in 1983. Read your history.
Oh ok. So if we ran the 1 gapping 4-3 in '83, your argument would change?

I'm saying that we ran current schemes for the time. Back then the 52 was popular. Jimmy brought the 43 and it became the standard after that.
 
I can see his point. It would just be weird. Miami, as we know them, has always been a program that runs current (at the time) pro style everything; even back in 1983 when we ran a split back offense and a 50 slant defense.

Personally I think what Gus Malzahn is doing is awesome, but that's a whole other conversation, lol.
Miami has always been a program that ran a 1 gapping 4-3. Why is that an argument for offense but not the defense?

Wrong again. We ran a one gap 52 slant in 1983. Read your history.
Oh ok. So if we ran the 1 gapping 4-3 in '83, your argument would change?

I'm saying that we ran current schemes for the time. Back then the 52 was popular. Jimmy brought the 43 and it became the standard after that.
Read option isn't a current scheme? It isn't popular with a lot of teams?
 
Advertisement
Miami has always been a program that ran a 1 gapping 4-3. Why is that an argument for offense but not the defense?

Wrong again. We ran a one gap 52 slant in 1983. Read your history.
Oh ok. So if we ran the 1 gapping 4-3 in '83, your argument would change?

I'm saying that we ran current schemes for the time. Back then the 52 was popular. Jimmy brought the 43 and it became the standard after that.
Read option isn't a current scheme? It isn't popular with a lot of teams?

I mean popular in the NFL at the time. My fault.

I'm not giving my opinion on the matter. Stop looking for it.

All I'm saying is that we have always been a pro style team, based on the pro trends at time. That's it.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top