Duke Loses Their Best Player And Leader On Defense..

[CaneAlmighty]

Sucks for the kid and Duke. One of the better LB's in the ACC.
But they are going to get a beat down with our with out him.

 

[Waffle Honcho]

lol @ duke being a good team.... lawd how far we have fallen..

LOL at you not knowing anything about football. Duke won 10 games last year and nearly beat Texas A&M in primetime if it wasn't for Johnny footballs last drive. I'm sure fans wouldn't have been freaking out so much if it was Texas A&M and not Duke we lost to.

Must be a pride thing for fans. With that thinking you can hate Louisville too because they've always been average and they beat the crap out of us

Please tell me you are not saying that Duke is or was as good as Texas AM based off a bowl game???? Duke would get destroyed in the SEC.

Last years Duke team was the prime example of a great staff getting every bit out of a team against a weak *** coastal. They played above their talent level for most of the year. We have had this discussion on here. Their recruiting ranking through the last 4-5 years is at the bottom of the ACC. Duke isn't some juggernaut going to dominate CFB now.

I think you need to look in the mirror before you go spouting off about who does and doesn't know anything about football.

Texas A&M got destroyed in the SEC last year. Only conference wins were against Miss St, Ole Miss, Arkansas and Vandy.

 

[ball915]

lol @ duke being a good team.... lawd how far we have fallen..

LOL at you not knowing anything about football. Duke won 10 games last year and nearly beat Texas A&M in primetime if it wasn't for Johnny footballs last drive. I'm sure fans wouldn't have been freaking out so much if it was Texas A&M and not Duke we lost to.

Must be a pride thing for fans. With that thinking you can hate Louisville too because they've always been average and they beat the crap out of us

Please tell me you are not saying that Duke is or was as good as Texas AM based off a bowl game???? Duke would get destroyed in the SEC.

Last years Duke team was the prime example of a great staff getting every bit out of a team against a weak *** coastal. They played above their talent level for most of the year. We have had this discussion on here. Their recruiting ranking through the last 4-5 years is at the bottom of the ACC. Duke isn't some juggernaut going to dominate CFB now.

I think you need to look in the mirror before you go spouting off about who does and doesn't know anything about football.

Texas A&M got destroyed in the SEC last year. Only conference wins were against Miss St, Ole Miss, Arkansas and Vandy.

won't be any different this year. Ole Miss could get them too

 

[deleted1562]

lol @ duke being a good team.... lawd how far we have fallen..

LOL at you not knowing anything about football. Duke won 10 games last year and nearly beat Texas A&M in primetime if it wasn't for Johnny footballs last drive. I'm sure fans wouldn't have been freaking out so much if it was Texas A&M and not Duke we lost to.

Must be a pride thing for fans. With that thinking you can hate Louisville too because they've always been average and they beat the crap out of us

Please tell me you are not saying that Duke is or was as good as Texas AM based off a bowl game???? Duke would get destroyed in the SEC.

Last years Duke team was the prime example of a great staff getting every bit out of a team against a weak *** coastal. They played above their talent level for most of the year. We have had this discussion on here. Their recruiting ranking through the last 4-5 years is at the bottom of the ACC. Duke isn't some juggernaut going to dominate CFB now.

I think you need to look in the mirror before you go spouting off about who does and doesn't know anything about football.

Texas A&M got destroyed in the SEC last year. Only conference wins were against Miss St, Ole Miss, Arkansas and Vandy.

Their losses came to 11-2 Alabama (#7) 42-49, 12-2 Auburn (#2) 41-45, 10-3 LSU (#14) 10-34, and 12-2 Mizzou (#5) 21-28.

While their record in the SEC may not have been great, their losses came to four top 15 teams/three top 10 teams, and they were all (with the exception of LSU) winnable games.

Yeah, I know, SEC bias and all that. Whatever. Just stating some facts.

 

[Miami82]

lol @ duke being a good team.... lawd how far we have fallen..

LOL at you not knowing anything about football. Duke won 10 games last year and nearly beat Texas A&M in primetime if it wasn't for Johnny footballs last drive. I'm sure fans wouldn't have been freaking out so much if it was Texas A&M and not Duke we lost to.

Must be a pride thing for fans. With that thinking you can hate Louisville too because they've always been average and they beat the crap out of us

Please tell me you are not saying that Duke is or was as good as Texas AM based off a bowl game???? Duke would get destroyed in the SEC.

Last years Duke team was the prime example of a great staff getting every bit out of a team against a weak *** coastal. They played above their talent level for most of the year. We have had this discussion on here. Their recruiting ranking through the last 4-5 years is at the bottom of the ACC. Duke isn't some juggernaut going to dominate CFB now.

I think you need to look in the mirror before you go spouting off about who does and doesn't know anything about football.

Texas A&M got destroyed in the SEC last year. Only conference wins were against Miss St, Ole Miss, Arkansas and Vandy.

Thanks for proving my point.

 

[407cane]

lol @ duke being a good team.... lawd how far we have fallen..

LOL at you not knowing anything about football. Duke won 10 games last year and nearly beat Texas A&M in primetime if it wasn't for Johnny footballs last drive. I'm sure fans wouldn't have been freaking out so much if it was Texas A&M and not Duke we lost to.

Must be a pride thing for fans. With that thinking you can hate Louisville too because they've always been average and they beat the crap out of us

Please tell me you are not saying that Duke is or was as good as Texas AM based off a bowl game???? Duke would get destroyed in the SEC.

Last years Duke team was the prime example of a great staff getting every bit out of a team against a weak *** coastal. They played above their talent level for most of the year. We have had this discussion on here. Their recruiting ranking through the last 4-5 years is at the bottom of the ACC. Duke isn't some juggernaut going to dominate CFB now.

I think you need to look in the mirror before you go spouting off about who does and doesn't know anything about football.

There was no point to what you said so he didn't prove anything. I never said Duke would last in the sec. Am I saying Duke is about as good as Texas A&M? Yes because they just played and it was a good game. How else are you supposed to compare two teams other than how the game goes when they play?

How is Texas A&M 's conference schedule brought into the discussion at all? They lost to Alabama, lsu, and Auburn who almost won the National championship game. And all games were close.. Those are three top ten teams in the country and Texas A&M played them tight until the end if the game.

The better thing to do would be to imagine how Texas A&M would have done against us last year. That would make sense and actually most of the posters on this board were terrified of Johnny Manziel and drawing them in the bowl game last year because of our horrible defense. Everyone was glad when we got Louisville, so I don't understand you're argument at all especially since it has nothing to do with what I said


If anything you proved my point. All I was saying is that Duke wasn't as bad as people were saying, I wasn't claiming they were great.so thank you for making my statement seem more clear



Correction Lsu game wasn't close but I forgot mizzou too. That was close as well and another loss

 

[L A M P]

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

 

[Miami82]

lol @ duke being a good team.... lawd how far we have fallen..

LOL at you not knowing anything about football. Duke won 10 games last year and nearly beat Texas A&M in primetime if it wasn't for Johnny footballs last drive. I'm sure fans wouldn't have been freaking out so much if it was Texas A&M and not Duke we lost to.

Must be a pride thing for fans. With that thinking you can hate Louisville too because they've always been average and they beat the crap out of us

Please tell me you are not saying that Duke is or was as good as Texas AM based off a bowl game???? Duke would get destroyed in the SEC.

Last years Duke team was the prime example of a great staff getting every bit out of a team against a weak *** coastal. They played above their talent level for most of the year. We have had this discussion on here. Their recruiting ranking through the last 4-5 years is at the bottom of the ACC. Duke isn't some juggernaut going to dominate CFB now.

I think you need to look in the mirror before you go spouting off about who does and doesn't know anything about football.

There was no point to what you said so he didn't prove anything. I never said Duke would last in the sec. Am I saying Duke is about as good as Texas A&M? Yes because they just played and it was a good game. How else are you supposed to compare two teams other than how the game goes when they play?

How is Texas A&M 's conference schedule brought into the discussion at all? They lost to Alabama, lsu, and Auburn who almost won the National championship game. And all games were close.. Those are three top ten teams in the country and Texas A&M played them tight until the end if the game.

The better thing to do would be to imagine how Texas A&M would have done against us last year. That would make sense and actually most of the posters on this board were terrified of Johnny Manziel and drawing them in the bowl game last year because of our horrible defense. Everyone was glad when we got Louisville, so I don't understand you're argument at all especially since it has nothing to do with what I said


If anything you proved my point. All I was saying is that Duke wasn't as bad as people were saying, I wasn't claiming they were great.so thank you for making my statement seem more clear



Correction Lsu game wasn't close but I forgot mizzou too. That was close as well and another loss

LMAO, do you know how to actually use this board to include the post you are referencing? Lets at least get the post correct before I continue to point out your stupidity.

 

[SmokeyRone]

Until they lose their HC, and hire Coley and Dorito equivelents as coordinators, they have the upper hand in any Duke/Miami matchup.

Nobody is fooled by Golden and Dorito anymore (if they ever were), except for a few message boards

 

[Waffle Honcho]

lol @ duke being a good team.... lawd how far we have fallen..

LOL at you not knowing anything about football. Duke won 10 games last year and nearly beat Texas A&M in primetime if it wasn't for Johnny footballs last drive. I'm sure fans wouldn't have been freaking out so much if it was Texas A&M and not Duke we lost to.

Must be a pride thing for fans. With that thinking you can hate Louisville too because they've always been average and they beat the crap out of us

Please tell me you are not saying that Duke is or was as good as Texas AM based off a bowl game???? Duke would get destroyed in the SEC.

Last years Duke team was the prime example of a great staff getting every bit out of a team against a weak *** coastal. They played above their talent level for most of the year. We have had this discussion on here. Their recruiting ranking through the last 4-5 years is at the bottom of the ACC. Duke isn't some juggernaut going to dominate CFB now.

I think you need to look in the mirror before you go spouting off about who does and doesn't know anything about football.

Texas A&M got destroyed in the SEC last year. Only conference wins were against Miss St, Ole Miss, Arkansas and Vandy.

Their losses came to 11-2 Alabama (#7) 42-49, 12-2 Auburn (#2) 41-45, 10-3 LSU (#14) 10-34, and 12-2 Mizzou (#5) 21-28.

While their record in the SEC may not have been great, their losses came to four top 15 teams/three top 10 teams, and they were all (with the exception of LSU) winnable games.

Yeah, I know, SEC bias and all that. Whatever. Just stating some facts.

Yeah, SEC bias and it's a circular argument as far as the rankings go. But whether or not those teams all deserved to be top 10/15 or whatever, they were the cream of the crop and why the SEC is considered difficult. It is not considered difficult because of the teams TAMU beat. To me, that qualifies as getting destroyed in the conference, because they lost to all of the good teams.

 

[407cane]

lol @ duke being a good team.... lawd how far we have fallen..

LOL at you not knowing anything about football. Duke won 10 games last year and nearly beat Texas A&M in primetime if it wasn't for Johnny footballs last drive. I'm sure fans wouldn't have been freaking out so much if it was Texas A&M and not Duke we lost to.

Must be a pride thing for fans. With that thinking you can hate Louisville too because they've always been average and they beat the crap out of us

Please tell me you are not saying that Duke is or was as good as Texas AM based off a bowl game???? Duke would get destroyed in the SEC.

Last years Duke team was the prime example of a great staff getting every bit out of a team against a weak *** coastal. They played above their talent level for most of the year. We have had this discussion on here. Their recruiting ranking through the last 4-5 years is at the bottom of the ACC. Duke isn't some juggernaut going to dominate CFB now.

I think you need to look in the mirror before you go spouting off about who does and doesn't know anything about football.

There was no point to what you said so he didn't prove anything. I never said Duke would last in the sec. Am I saying Duke is about as good as Texas A&M? Yes because they just played and it was a good game. How else are you supposed to compare two teams other than how the game goes when they play?

How is Texas A&M 's conference schedule brought into the discussion at all? They lost to Alabama, lsu, and Auburn who almost won the National championship game. And all games were close.. Those are three top ten teams in the country and Texas A&M played them tight until the end if the game.

The better thing to do would be to imagine how Texas A&M would have done against us last year. That would make sense and actually most of the posters on this board were terrified of Johnny Manziel and drawing them in the bowl game last year because of our horrible defense. Everyone was glad when we got Louisville, so I don't understand you're argument at all especially since it has nothing to do with what I said


If anything you proved my point. All I was saying is that Duke wasn't as bad as people were saying, I wasn't claiming they were great.so thank you for making my statement seem more clear



Correction Lsu game wasn't close but I forgot mizzou too. That was close as well and another loss

LMAO, do you know how to actually use this board to include the post you are referencing? Lets at least get the post correct before I continue to point out your stupidity.

I sincerely apologize that my response did not meet proper board etiquette. I used my smartphone to reply to this series of idiotic posts and the browser is not quite as refined as chrome is on my laptop.

Glad that you finally came around and realized there was nothing more you could argue concerning the actual point though.

 

[Miami82]

LOL at you not knowing anything about football. Duke won 10 games last year and nearly beat Texas A&M in primetime if it wasn't for Johnny footballs last drive. I'm sure fans wouldn't have been freaking out so much if it was Texas A&M and not Duke we lost to.

Must be a pride thing for fans. With that thinking you can hate Louisville too because they've always been average and they beat the crap out of us

Please tell me you are not saying that Duke is or was as good as Texas AM based off a bowl game???? Duke would get destroyed in the SEC.

Last years Duke team was the prime example of a great staff getting every bit out of a team against a weak *** coastal. They played above their talent level for most of the year. We have had this discussion on here. Their recruiting ranking through the last 4-5 years is at the bottom of the ACC. Duke isn't some juggernaut going to dominate CFB now.

I think you need to look in the mirror before you go spouting off about who does and doesn't know anything about football.

There was no point to what you said so he didn't prove anything. I never said Duke would last in the sec. Am I saying Duke is about as good as Texas A&M? Yes because they just played and it was a good game. How else are you supposed to compare two teams other than how the game goes when they play?

How is Texas A&M 's conference schedule brought into the discussion at all? They lost to Alabama, lsu, and Auburn who almost won the National championship game. And all games were close.. Those are three top ten teams in the country and Texas A&M played them tight until the end if the game.

The better thing to do would be to imagine how Texas A&M would have done against us last year. That would make sense and actually most of the posters on this board were terrified of Johnny Manziel and drawing them in the bowl game last year because of our horrible defense. Everyone was glad when we got Louisville, so I don't understand you're argument at all especially since it has nothing to do with what I said


If anything you proved my point. All I was saying is that Duke wasn't as bad as people were saying, I wasn't claiming they were great.so thank you for making my statement seem more clear



Correction Lsu game wasn't close but I forgot mizzou too. That was close as well and another loss

LMAO, do you know how to actually use this board to include the post you are referencing? Lets at least get the post correct before I continue to point out your stupidity.

I sincerely apologize that my response did not meet proper board etiquette. I used my smartphone to reply to this series of idiotic posts and the browser is not quite as refined as chrome is on my laptop.

Glad that you finally came around and realized there was nothing more you could argue concerning the actual point though.

So basically you are too stupid to reference the correct post and continue to ignore the correct series of statements because you know you will made the fool.

Kudo's...

 

[Miami82]

LOL at you not knowing anything about football. Duke won 10 games last year and nearly beat Texas A&M in primetime if it wasn't for Johnny footballs last drive. I'm sure fans wouldn't have been freaking out so much if it was Texas A&M and not Duke we lost to.

Must be a pride thing for fans. With that thinking you can hate Louisville too because they've always been average and they beat the crap out of us

Please tell me you are not saying that Duke is or was as good as Texas AM based off a bowl game???? Duke would get destroyed in the SEC.

Last years Duke team was the prime example of a great staff getting every bit out of a team against a weak *** coastal. They played above their talent level for most of the year. We have had this discussion on here. Their recruiting ranking through the last 4-5 years is at the bottom of the ACC. Duke isn't some juggernaut going to dominate CFB now.

I think you need to look in the mirror before you go spouting off about who does and doesn't know anything about football.

Texas A&M got destroyed in the SEC last year. Only conference wins were against Miss St, Ole Miss, Arkansas and Vandy.

Their losses came to 11-2 Alabama (#7) 42-49, 12-2 Auburn (#2) 41-45, 10-3 LSU (#14) 10-34, and 12-2 Mizzou (#5) 21-28.

While their record in the SEC may not have been great, their losses came to four top 15 teams/three top 10 teams, and they were all (with the exception of LSU) winnable games.

Yeah, I know, SEC bias and all that. Whatever. Just stating some facts.

Yeah, SEC bias and it's a circular argument as far as the rankings go. But whether or not those teams all deserved to be top 10/15 or whatever, they were the cream of the crop and why the SEC is considered difficult. It is not considered difficult because of the teams TAMU beat. To me, that qualifies as getting destroyed in the conference, because they lost to all of the good teams.

And again, thanks for furthering my point for the tards in this thread.

 

[SmokeyRone]

When the 2-2 or 1-3 Canes lose to Duke, how many Golden slurpers will be left here? Will this become a SCOUT/GRASSY, where Golden supporters start bragging about each loss, throwing it in ouir faces. Thread titles like "Golden is still our Coach"?

 

[Waffle Honcho]

Please tell me you are not saying that Duke is or was as good as Texas AM based off a bowl game???? Duke would get destroyed in the SEC.

Last years Duke team was the prime example of a great staff getting every bit out of a team against a weak *** coastal. They played above their talent level for most of the year. We have had this discussion on here. Their recruiting ranking through the last 4-5 years is at the bottom of the ACC. Duke isn't some juggernaut going to dominate CFB now.

I think you need to look in the mirror before you go spouting off about who does and doesn't know anything about football.

Texas A&M got destroyed in the SEC last year. Only conference wins were against Miss St, Ole Miss, Arkansas and Vandy.

Their losses came to 11-2 Alabama (#7) 42-49, 12-2 Auburn (#2) 41-45, 10-3 LSU (#14) 10-34, and 12-2 Mizzou (#5) 21-28.

While their record in the SEC may not have been great, their losses came to four top 15 teams/three top 10 teams, and they were all (with the exception of LSU) winnable games.

Yeah, I know, SEC bias and all that. Whatever. Just stating some facts.

Yeah, SEC bias and it's a circular argument as far as the rankings go. But whether or not those teams all deserved to be top 10/15 or whatever, they were the cream of the crop and why the SEC is considered difficult. It is not considered difficult because of the teams TAMU beat. To me, that qualifies as getting destroyed in the conference, because they lost to all of the good teams.

And again, thanks for furthering my point for the tards in this thread.

Wasn't your point that TAMU was way better than Duke and shouldn't be compared based off the bowl game? And furthermore that Duke would get destroyed in the SEC implying that TAMU was NOT destroyed? Didn't know you were making the point that TAMU wasn't really that good. But whatever.

 

[Miami82]

Texas A&M got destroyed in the SEC last year. Only conference wins were against Miss St, Ole Miss, Arkansas and Vandy.

Their losses came to 11-2 Alabama (#7) 42-49, 12-2 Auburn (#2) 41-45, 10-3 LSU (#14) 10-34, and 12-2 Mizzou (#5) 21-28.

While their record in the SEC may not have been great, their losses came to four top 15 teams/three top 10 teams, and they were all (with the exception of LSU) winnable games.

Yeah, I know, SEC bias and all that. Whatever. Just stating some facts.

Yeah, SEC bias and it's a circular argument as far as the rankings go. But whether or not those teams all deserved to be top 10/15 or whatever, they were the cream of the crop and why the SEC is considered difficult. It is not considered difficult because of the teams TAMU beat. To me, that qualifies as getting destroyed in the conference, because they lost to all of the good teams.

And again, thanks for furthering my point for the tards in this thread.

Wasn't your point that TAMU was way better than Duke and shouldn't be compared based off the bowl game? Didn't know you were making the point that TAMU wasn't really that good. But whatever.

Both actually. Bowl games are not a great comparison of head to head as compared to in season play. Its analogues as the last decade comparison of BSU. How would they survive in a real conference? The TAMU/Duke game tells me exactly what I already knew. The coaching staff of Duke is top notch, and that Duke would get destroyed and not even play close to those top 4 teams as TAMU did had they played back to back week to week. Bowl games are a 4 week prep and just from watching many bowl games through many years, not all staffs take it as serious unless they are playing for a NC. OU made a big deal out of beating Bama this last year. I don't give it the same weight as normal in season game or actually playing for something. College ball is based off emotion as well as coaching. If your heart isn't in it, you can see it on the field.

The stupid thing here is, Duke lost to TAMU, they didn't win. You don't get a prize for coming up short... how pathetic our fan base has become. **** you have some tards praising our team because they hung with the noles for 2 quarters... ******* pathetic I tell you.

 

[Waffle Honcho]

When the 2-2 or 1-3 Canes lose to Duke, how many Golden slurpers will be left here? Will this become a SCOUT/GRASSY, where Golden supporters start bragging about each loss, throwing it in ouir faces. Thread titles like "Golden is still our Coach"?

So are you a Shannon slurper? You seem overjoyed about the possibility of us losing 3 early games.

 

[Waffle Honcho]

Their losses came to 11-2 Alabama (#7) 42-49, 12-2 Auburn (#2) 41-45, 10-3 LSU (#14) 10-34, and 12-2 Mizzou (#5) 21-28.

While their record in the SEC may not have been great, their losses came to four top 15 teams/three top 10 teams, and they were all (with the exception of LSU) winnable games.

Yeah, I know, SEC bias and all that. Whatever. Just stating some facts.

Yeah, SEC bias and it's a circular argument as far as the rankings go. But whether or not those teams all deserved to be top 10/15 or whatever, they were the cream of the crop and why the SEC is considered difficult. It is not considered difficult because of the teams TAMU beat. To me, that qualifies as getting destroyed in the conference, because they lost to all of the good teams.

And again, thanks for furthering my point for the tards in this thread.

Wasn't your point that TAMU was way better than Duke and shouldn't be compared based off the bowl game? Didn't know you were making the point that TAMU wasn't really that good. But whatever.

Both actually. Bowl games are not a great comparison of head to head as compared to in season play. Its analogues as the last decade comparison of BSU. How would they survive in a real conference? The TAMU/Duke game tells me exactly what I already knew. The coaching staff of Duke is top notch, and that Duke would get destroyed and not even play close to those top 4 teams as TAMU did had they played back to back week to week. Bowl games are a 4 week prep and just from watching many bowl games through many years, not all staffs take it as serious unless they are playing for a NC. OU made a big deal out of beating Bama this last year. I don't give it the same weight as normal in season game or actually playing for something. College ball is based off emotion as well as coaching. If your heart isn't in it, you can see it on the field.

The stupid thing here is, Duke lost to TAMU, they didn't win. You don't get a prize for coming up short... how pathetic our fan base has become. **** you have some tards praising our team because they hung with the noles for 2 quarters... ******* pathetic I tell you.

Yeah, so the things I was saying didn't prove your point.

 

[Miami82]

Yeah, SEC bias and it's a circular argument as far as the rankings go. But whether or not those teams all deserved to be top 10/15 or whatever, they were the cream of the crop and why the SEC is considered difficult. It is not considered difficult because of the teams TAMU beat. To me, that qualifies as getting destroyed in the conference, because they lost to all of the good teams.

And again, thanks for furthering my point for the tards in this thread.

Wasn't your point that TAMU was way better than Duke and shouldn't be compared based off the bowl game? Didn't know you were making the point that TAMU wasn't really that good. But whatever.

Both actually. Bowl games are not a great comparison of head to head as compared to in season play. Its analogues as the last decade comparison of BSU. How would they survive in a real conference? The TAMU/Duke game tells me exactly what I already knew. The coaching staff of Duke is top notch, and that Duke would get destroyed and not even play close to those top 4 teams as TAMU did had they played back to back week to week. Bowl games are a 4 week prep and just from watching many bowl games through many years, not all staffs take it as serious unless they are playing for a NC. OU made a big deal out of beating Bama this last year. I don't give it the same weight as normal in season game or actually playing for something. College ball is based off emotion as well as coaching. If your heart isn't in it, you can see it on the field.

The stupid thing here is, Duke lost to TAMU, they didn't win. You don't get a prize for coming up short... how pathetic our fan base has become. **** you have some tards praising our team because they hung with the noles for 2 quarters... ******* pathetic I tell you.

Yeah, so the things I was saying didn't prove your point.

I see you have reading comprehension issues as well...

 

[Waffle Honcho]

And again, thanks for furthering my point for the tards in this thread.

Wasn't your point that TAMU was way better than Duke and shouldn't be compared based off the bowl game? Didn't know you were making the point that TAMU wasn't really that good. But whatever.

Both actually. Bowl games are not a great comparison of head to head as compared to in season play. Its analogues as the last decade comparison of BSU. How would they survive in a real conference? The TAMU/Duke game tells me exactly what I already knew. The coaching staff of Duke is top notch, and that Duke would get destroyed and not even play close to those top 4 teams as TAMU did had they played back to back week to week. Bowl games are a 4 week prep and just from watching many bowl games through many years, not all staffs take it as serious unless they are playing for a NC. OU made a big deal out of beating Bama this last year. I don't give it the same weight as normal in season game or actually playing for something. College ball is based off emotion as well as coaching. If your heart isn't in it, you can see it on the field.

The stupid thing here is, Duke lost to TAMU, they didn't win. You don't get a prize for coming up short... how pathetic our fan base has become. **** you have some tards praising our team because they hung with the noles for 2 quarters... ******* pathetic I tell you.

Yeah, so the things I was saying didn't prove your point.

I see you have reading comprehension issues as well...

Yeah, 99th percentile my whole life, but can't figure out a moron on an internet forum. Get over yourself.