forums

Dapper or other Lawyers; thoughts on NCAA stuff

TooColdToHold said:
The point of this is to prevent her from disclosing all of their dirt. That will allow them to try to ***** us.
Click to expand...

That screws Perez in her investigation and any potential hearing with the Florida bar and that information will come out anyway. Not good for her at all.
 
Advertisement
Their communications with her were presumably not to secure legal advice, as is normally required to create a privileged communication; rather they seem to simply have been for her to carry out questions in the bankruptcy proceeding on their behalf.
 
I hope the silence means Shalala is dropping her lady balls in the NCAA's mouth forcing them to run back and leave us the **** alone.
 
jevoasis said:
I hope the silence means Shalala is dropping her lady balls in the NCAA's mouth forcing them to run back and leave us the **** alone.
Click to expand...

She's sitting back, balls out, staring at Emmert like "whatcha got, *****?" She's got him mindf*cked at this point. She just letting him hang himself. He has no clue what his next move should be.
 
No, the privilege is broadly construed to protect the client (the NCAA). You do not need to be in litigation or any adversarial posture for the privilege to attach.

But it sure smells to first admit the association with Perez was improper, but then to put up the privilege as a shield so you don't have to divulge exactly what was improper.

TooColdToHold said:
nadiamufdi said:
Emmert wouldnt have confessed they f*cked up and been all ****ed off if they had an attorney client privilege.

"Whoops, my bad. We were allowed to do that after all. Back to f*ck you Miami."

And, to my knowledge, they had no client in the bankruptcy hearing
Click to expand...


Good point. To claim attorney client privilege, wouldn't they have to admit she was working for them during the bankruptcy proceedings?
Click to expand...
 
Advertisement
I've been hearing rumors that we should know something by tomorrow regarding this...what a f*cking joke.
 
Any lawyers want to tell me what sort of legs this has? ESF? Jer? Map? Chise? Anyone else?
 
Advertisement
No doubt the NCAA will now attempt to spin it that they did nothing improper which is tough since they already admitted they did. They'll use the Washington law firm's legal opinion as justification but this whole thing is headed to court over a number of issues unless Emmert gets a settlement with Shalala. The actions of the NCAA acting with monopolistic powers puts them in potential conflict with anti-trust laws.
 
The Franchise said:
nadiamufdi said:
Emmert wouldnt have confessed they f*cked up and been all ****ed off if they had an attorney client privilege.

"Whoops, my bad. We were allowed to do that after all. Back to f*ck you Miami."

And, to my knowledge, they had no client in the bankruptcy hearing
Click to expand...

He can admit to the f#ck up/fraud and still hope to keep the correspondences and words exchanged between the NCAA and Pig ***** Perez confidential. NCAA is going to do whatever it can to keep the lid on just how seedy that can of worms between it and Pig ***** Perez is.
Click to expand...

Thanks for Learnsin me Chise
 
I read that article as saying that Humphrey, who works in enforcement, said (when she first notified parties over the phone that the NCAA had been involved with Perez) that the NCAA was going to claim attorney client privilege. In the same conversation she said basically said the NCAA got great info from working with Perez (obviously, that isn't going to mean anything) and that they would claim attorney client privilege with respect to dealings with Perez (this could also be outdated at this point). The whole call was enforcement flexing its muscles - just like they tried to do in paying Perez in the first place. At this point, I wouldn't attach any significance to anything Humphrey said during that call, unless Emmert comes out and says the same thing.

Based on the news he reported, I have no idea why the author felt he had to talk to a lawyer and ask about attorney client privilege. There is nothing to this story at this point.
 
how can the pig lawyer ethically and professionally represent 2 clients with supposed different interests? shapiro has stated his intent to take down the athletic department and the NCAA is SUPPOSED to be seeking the truth. I dont see how these two parties could be represented by the same attorney

that screams of professional misconduct at least (by both the NCAA and the pig lawyer)
 
Advertisement
Bigtip said:
how can the pig lawyer ethically and professionally represent 2 clients with supposed different interests? shapiro has stated his intent to take down the athletic department and the NCAA is SUPPOSED to be seeking the truth. I dont see how these two parties could be represented by the same attorney

that screams of professional misconduct at least (by both the NCAA and the pig lawyer)
Click to expand...


Nah, they both had the same goal - to take down Miami's athletic department.
 
Lawyers are the lowest forms of scum on the planet. Passing the bar means you are barred from telling the truth "just let the process unfold". These scummy focks have zero morals or ethics. Lie, lie, lie, deny, deny, deny... That's lawyerism 101. Produce nothing and rob, lie, cheat, and steal is how these parasites make their money.

The NCAA came and stated they had to have an investigation into their own inner workings due to fraudulent BS. Then they hired a "private investigative firm" to clean up the mess and low and behold nothing happened? GTFOOH! Lawyer scum is going to lawyer scum...
 
Bigtip said:
how can the pig lawyer ethically and professionally represent 2 clients with supposed different interests? shapiro has stated his intent to take down the athletic department and the NCAA is SUPPOSED to be seeking the truth. I dont see how these two parties could be represented by the same attorney

that screams of professional misconduct at least (by both the NCAA and the pig lawyer)
Click to expand...

Good point, two separate clients with separate interests share information that the third party is not privy to. Couldn't that break the atty client privilege rule and force disclosure?
 
Advertisement
Picksix said:
Lawyers are the lowest forms of scum on the planet. Passing the bar means you are barred from telling the truth "just let the process unfold". These scummy focks have zero morals or ethics. Lie, lie, lie, deny, deny, deny... That's lawyerism 101. Produce nothing and rob, lie, cheat, and steal is how these parasites make their money.
Click to expand...

Thank you, do all Jews have horns or just the ones that haven't had the surgery to remove them.
 
Picksix said:
Lawyers are the lowest forms of scum on the planet. Passing the bar means you are barred from telling the truth "just let the process unfold". These scummy focks have zero morals or ethics. Lie, lie, lie, deny, deny, deny... That's lawyerism 101. Produce nothing and rob, lie, cheat, and steal is how these parasites make their money.

The NCAA came and stated they had to have an investigation into their own inner workings due to fraudulent BS. Then they hired a "private investigative firm" to clean up the mess and low and behold nothing happened? GTFOOH! Lawyer scum is going to lawyer scum...
Click to expand...

I hope you never get screwed over by a insurance company and need the help of good legal representation or get a bogus lawsuit against and need somebody in your corner.
 
Consigliere said:
Picksix said:
Lawyers are the lowest forms of scum on the planet. Passing the bar means you are barred from telling the truth "just let the process unfold". These scummy focks have zero morals or ethics. Lie, lie, lie, deny, deny, deny... That's lawyerism 101. Produce nothing and rob, lie, cheat, and steal is how these parasites make their money.
Click to expand...

Thank you, do all Jews have horns or just the ones that haven't had the surgery to remove them.
Click to expand...

The procedure has really developed that you can't even see the scar marks anymore
 
nadiamufdi said:
Consigliere said:
Picksix said:
Lawyers are the lowest forms of scum on the planet. Passing the bar means you are barred from telling the truth "just let the process unfold". These scummy focks have zero morals or ethics. Lie, lie, lie, deny, deny, deny... That's lawyerism 101. Produce nothing and rob, lie, cheat, and steal is how these parasites make their money.
Click to expand...

Thank you, do all Jews have horns or just the ones that haven't had the surgery to remove them.
Click to expand...

The procedure has really developed that you can't even see the scar marks anymore
Click to expand...

That is cause I wear a "beanie" 24/7.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top