All it takes is one injury to the TE room for us to be thankful for Cam McCormick. He's not special, but he's a steady blocker who can work underneath.
Except he can’t do either of those things
All it takes is one injury to the TE room for us to be thankful for Cam McCormick. He's not special, but he's a steady blocker who can work underneath.
It's the nature of the game brother. #1 health, #2 production,#3 development.
Last year our starting tight end was arroyo. Well he was hurt the entire season and minus attempting twice to get on the field, he was simply a non factor. We went into the season thinking Riley Williams would IMMEDIATELY play a huge role. Facts are last season he had tons of growing pains, lack of confidence and he was lost for whatever reason anytime he touched the field. Cam McCormick you at least knew exactly what you had and it was essentially an extra blocker for either a QB who on his best day simply didn't look to his tightends and on his worst day had an inability to get the ball down field consistently.
Short term and long-term bringing in McCormick does more harm than goodThanks for the reply however they’re had to have been a better TE option other than McCormick in a portal if development and health was an issue at the TE position
Van Dyke hit 8.1 yards per attempt last year, Cam Ward was 7.7. Adjusted 7.6 and 8.1, respectively. Van Dyke gets the ball downfield, just to the other team a few too many times.It's the nature of the game brother. #1 health, #2 production,#3 development.
Last year our starting tight end was arroyo. Well he was hurt the entire season and minus attempting twice to get on the field, he was simply a non factor. We went into the season thinking Riley Williams would IMMEDIATELY play a huge role. Facts are last season he had tons of growing pains, lack of confidence and he was lost for whatever reason anytime he touched the field. Cam McCormick you at least knew exactly what you had and it was essentially an extra blocker for either a QB who on his best day simply didn't look to his tightends and on his worst day had an inability to get the ball down field consistently.
Agreed and good point. But I think it is absurd to argue as some have that Cam is being played over better players.
Exactly what I was going to say. If he does have anything more than a mop up role, all the hope for a better 2024 can be forgotten.I hope not
And this is why he should’ve never been at Miami in the 1st placePeople underestimate how much of a negative it was for our offense, last year, without a tight end. A healthy and experienced TE room will pay dividends, especially with the WR group we have.
On paper, this offense is pick your poison for opposing D’s. Elite QB, very very good WRs, Elite RB, and talented TEs that have shown flashes.
You wanna get someone out the portal now? Rather than realizing how young we are at the position and only way to develop is live action? Seems like a constant double negative. If we constantly run everyone off than we're gonna be needing to flip the roster yearly. Let's all just take a seat and let the professionals handle it.Thanks for the reply however they’re had to have been a better TE option other than McCormick in a portal if development and health was an issue at the TE position
I don't think so. Just needed more so for the locker room.
Does Cam McCormick have a role on the 2024 offense? What is it?
Maybe a leadership role in the locker room. I didn't see much to get excited about with his production on the field last year, his 8th in college football.Does Cam McCormick have a role on the 2024 offense? What is it?
Don't wanna harp on last season but this is a simple point in why context is necessary with stats. Yes cam averaged 7.6 while Tyler averaged 8.1. However cam had 100 more completions and 200 more attempts. To go along with a higher qbr & completion percentage. More touchdowns,less interceptions. Easiest way to break it down is Tyler was boom or bust. If you look further into it Tyler's success all came in his first 7 games essentially. Really 6 of those 7. Rest of the season he was a burden to the offense and the team as a whole. Night and day what we expect out of this season based strictly on results. Not blind faith.Van Dyke hit 8.1 yards per attempt last year, Cam Ward was 7.7. Adjusted 7.6 and 8.1, respectively. Van Dyke gets the ball downfield, just to the other team a few too many times.
The TE room also had Skinner who is now at L'ville and good enough for Brohm's offense. I have a feeling Brohm figures out how to use the dude better than Dawson did.
If TVD played how he did over the first half of the season over the entire season, there'd be very few complaints about the offense at all. I was *****ing about Cam as well, but it is very obvious the situation last year was Riley was a true frosh and TE is a hard position to get immediate impact, and Arroyo was hurt. Skinner maybe turns it around at louisville - not like he doesn't have talent.... but he can't play inline and he was dropping passes too. Not like he was doing anything with his opportunities and still not seeing PT...Don't wanna harp on last season but this is a simple point in why context is necessary with stats. Yes cam averaged 7.6 while Tyler averaged 8.1. However cam had 100 more completions and 200 more attempts. To go along with a higher qbr & completion percentage. More touchdowns,less interceptions. Easiest way to break it down is Tyler was boom or bust. If you look further into it Tyler's success all came in his first 7 games essentially. Really 6 of those 7. Rest of the season he was a burden to the offense and the team as a whole. Night and day what we expect out of this season based strictly on results. Not blind faith.
Charting plays..anything more and it’s a waste of a player on the field..Does Cam McCormick have a role on the 2024 offense? What is it?