forums
MEGA Conference Realignment and lawsuits Megathread: Stories, Tales, Lies, and Exaggerations
- Thread starter OrangeBowlMagic
- Start date
Advertisement
Gennaker Cane
Freshman
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2011
- Messages
- 321
Yeah, good luck to UCLA for getting out of the red when the deficit is getting bigger. They have much bigger issues than they thought, this deal just isn't the panacea they convinced themselves it would be. And OSU is losing money, despite a championship year, with a playoff that gave them an extra sell out at home.
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2013
- Messages
- 33,048
Lol; OK.
I’m sure u didn’t see it was from the 2023-2024 season, but go off my ninja.
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2019
- Messages
- 442
Your overall point is valid, but just FYI ticket revenues for CFP went to the CFP. Schools got parking and concessions. And they got paid by the CFP for each round of course.
If you believe that the championship playoff criteria aren't dramatically changing initiating with the 2026 season .. don't know what to tell you. The ACC and B12 will have very limited access to the CFP while the P2 will have AT LEAST 4 auto bids. And that is for starters. ACC will be lucky to continue with ONE.
Advertisement
Virginia_Cane
All-American
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2018
- Messages
- 1,130
The Genetics vs Flugaur beef on twitter has been gold today
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2016
- Messages
- 7,954
Your predictions are quite believable and probably end up as you state.
Continuing to post false statements to back up said predictions is weak though. P2 doesn't have "actual contractual control" of the CFP structure. Each conference has its own vote. They need the majority of conferences and ND to pass changes to the playoff structure and selection criteria. The P2 may want a guaranteed 3 or 4 spots each in the playoff every year, but they don't just snap their fingers and it happens.
NorthernVirginiaCane
Sophomore
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2019
- Messages
- 945
Nope.
I think it's easier for miami to get one of 1-2-3 acc than 3-4 sec or big 10 bids, Indiana this year notwithstanding
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2011
- Messages
- 422
Excellent work. Very tight writing.
Advertisement
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2016
- Messages
- 11,653
Integral folding knives, where the frame and handle are made from a single piece of material (typically titanium or steel), offer unique advantages and some challenges when it comes to everyday carry (EDC). Here’s a detailed breakdown of their pros and cons, along with a few notable brands and models from the US.
Pros of Integral Folding Knives for EDC:
1.
- One-piece construction: The integral design makes the knife more structurally robust. Because there are no joints or screws holding the frame together, there is less chance of the knife failing under stress or wear over time. This leads to a higher level of durability compared to traditional multi-piece knives.
- Resistant to warping or cracking: Since the handle and the frame are forged from a single piece, integral knives often resist twisting or warping, which can sometimes happen in knives with multiple parts.
2.
- Balanced feel: Integral knives tend to have excellent balance. The weight distribution is typically more even across the entire handle, making them feel more natural and stable in hand during use.
3.
- Clean, seamless design: Integral knives are visually striking due to their smooth, uninterrupted lines. The seamless nature of the frame adds a level of sophistication and uniqueness to the design, often appealing to those who appreciate minimalist and high-quality craftsmanship.
4.
- Fewer moving parts: With no screws or pivots holding the handle parts together, integral knives tend to have fewer potential weak points. This can lead to a more reliable knife over time with less maintenance required.
Cons of Integral Folding Knives for EDC:
1.
- Higher price: The complexity of manufacturing an integral knife leads to higher costs. It requires more skill and time to machine the handle from a single block of material, which can push the price point up compared to standard folding knives.
2.
- Heavier construction: Integral knives are often heavier than traditional multi-piece folding knives due to the dense materials used in their construction (often titanium or steel). This can be a downside for those seeking ultra-lightweight EDC options.
3.
- Fewer handle options: Since the handle is integral and crafted from a single piece, it’s not easy to change or modify it for different textures, colors, or grips. In contrast, traditional knives allow for more varied and customizable handle materials.
4.
- Difficulty in repairs: If the frame becomes damaged, it can be difficult or even impossible to repair an integral knife. Traditional knives, with multiple parts, are often easier to disassemble and fix or replace individual components.
Notable US Brands and Models for Integral Folding Knives:
1.
- Model: Chris Reeve Sebenza 31
Known for pioneering the integral folding knife, Chris Reeve’s Sebenza series remains a gold standard. The Sebenza 31 is crafted from titanium, features a frame lock mechanism, and is highly regarded for its smooth action, robustness, and reliability. It’s a favorite in the EDC community, though it comes at a premium price point. - Pros: Excellent fit and finish, renowned for smooth action, strong and lightweight.
- Cons: Expensive, weightier compared to some other EDC options.
2.
- Model: Hinderer XM-18
Hinderer’s XM-18 is another great example of an integral knife design, known for its modular approach. It allows for some level of customization with different handle scales and the ability to swap parts, but the frame itself remains integral. It’s durable and tough, designed for heavy-duty use. - Pros: Tough and versatile, excellent blade geometry, highly customizable in terms of accessories.
- Cons: Heavy for EDC, expensive, and can be bulky for smaller pockets.
3.
- Model: ZT 0393
Zero Tolerance is known for producing high-end, heavy-duty knives, and their ZT 0393 features an integral titanium frame with a smooth, buttery action. It’s built for tough, everyday use but also retains a sleek design. The blade steel is usually premium (like CPM 20CV), adding to its high-quality build. - Pros: Solid build, premium materials, robust blade.
- Cons: On the larger side for EDC, pricey.
4.
- Model: Spyderco Shaman (a traditional folding design, though they’ve explored integral folding knives with some custom collaborations)While Spyderco generally doesn’t focus solely on integral folding knives, they occasionally release custom or limited-edition models that feature integral frames, often in collaboration with well-known designers like Peter Rassenti.
- Pros: Ergonomically designed handles, excellent edge retention, unique collaborations.
- Cons: Less emphasis on integral knives as a regular offering.
Final Thoughts:
Integral folding knives make for excellent EDC tools for those who value durability, performance, and design aesthetics. While they come with certain drawbacks like cost, weight, and limited customization, the benefits of strength, balance, and reliability often outweigh these cons for many users. Brands like Chris Reeve, Hinderer, and Zero Tolerance lead the charge in producing high-quality, integral folding knives, and these are excellent options to consider if you’re looking for a knife that combines artistry with functionality.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2014
- Messages
- 56,796
Forgive me for not knowing where things stand in here as I don’t read this thread religiously. So after all of the back and forth, were you ultimately the winner in the argument that we aren’t getting out of the ACC and are stuck until 2036 or whatever the date was?
Advertisement