- Joined
- Nov 2, 2011
- Messages
- 5,908
No
Pate nailed the timing of the Colorado announcement
Pate nailed the timing of the Colorado announcement
The current theory is the schools want to pay for their own buyout over 10 years time. The difference in revenue supposedly makes it worth it.That would happen only if somehow the ACC's GOR was able to broken. Otherwise, they'd be moving to a conference where they wouldn't receive any TV money.
BingoThe current theory is the schools want to pay for their own buyout over 10 years time. The difference in revenue supposedly makes it worth it.
As long as we have a stipulation that if 8 of the current ACC members leave the conference (same thing as if we voted to dissolve) that our balanced owed gets cut to $0.Bingo
If I recall, the bigten tv deal is up again around 2030, so assuming tv money continues to increase, the delta in amortizing $300mm over 10yrs vs annual big ten payouts would totally make sense for a school to navigate in such a fashion
With the hope that somewhere along the way, litigation and negotiation will help reduce if not completely eliminate the buyout.Bingo
If I recall, the bigten tv deal is up again around 2030, so assuming tv money continues to increase, the delta in amortizing $300mm over 10yrs vs annual big ten payouts would totally make sense for a school to navigate in such a fashion
With the hope that somewhere along the way, litigation and negotiation will help reduce if not completely eliminate the buyout.
But if you have the top 4, Plus ND, you only need 3 2nd tier schools to leave in order to not have to pay any exit fee.... cause you'd be at 8 votes...This is purely my speculation
Miami fsu Clemson unc band together and negotiate a reduced exit fee, somewhere between $50mm to $100mm each
The other 2nd tier schools pay a much less exit fee in exchange for joining the new consolidated big12 acc leftovers
I’ve always thought that the foursome of UNC-Duke-NCST-Louisville went to the SEC. Duke is the only team that doesn’t fit the SEC profile but then again they add a basketball powerhouse and someone to pair with Vandy to help with the academic profile. They’d clean up in NC, and also have the state of Kentucky. Perhaps they’d take UVA/VT as well to finish off the barrier.Why would the Big 10 not want UNC?
Tallahassee is well within SEC country. The advantage of UNC is expansion into a state they have no claim to and a basketball tradition.Clemson/UNC are the top two for SEC consideration based on fit and geographic location.
I thought UM was a lock for the Big10 - if FSU and Clemson are taken first and we are a next wave team that is not great. I assumed the FSU Clemson leak was to force the SECs hand to expand earlier but UM needs in either conference or it’s game over
UM has a slot in the B10 regardless of "when" they pull the trigger. The B10 projected payouts per team certainly look attractive and DO leave room for paying a "negotiated settlement" over the remaining GOR term (ie like Swaim 'reported' something like a $300 M settlement with annual payments).I thought UM was a lock for the Big10 - if FSU and Clemson are taken first and we are a next wave team that is not great. I assumed the FSU Clemson leak was to force the SECs hand to expand earlier but UM needs in either conference or it’s game over