I never said anything you claimed.
You are free to discuss Oregon as much as you'd like. However, given the context of being on a Miami board, you MIGHT be mocked for your repetitive and predictable discussion of Oregon.
Surely you can grasp that.
And I apologize, I just laughed out loud when I re-read your final sentence. Yes, Mr. Perry Mason, you really broke me on the witness stand with that tough and probing question about Oregon. You really had me on the run with your cross examination...
Please...
Here's the reality, and I've said it before, so this is nothing shocking. There are comparable, but different, arguments for the Big 10 taking Cal-Stanford if they took two more west coast schools. So, no, even with your withering questioning, I do NOT think it is a foregone conclusion that your Beloved Oregon gets a Big 10 invitation if the Big 10 gets even bigger. Maybe yes, maybe no. There are arguments in favor of Cal-Stanford, and there are arguments in favor of Washington-Beloved. I don't pretend to know what the Big 10 will ultimately decide in that regard. Too many variables, including how the Big 12 and Pac 12 shake out, whether the SEC jumps in to pick off any ACC teams, and how the GOR situation is handled (assuming it is a negotiated settlement whereby ESPN gets its foot back in the door with the Big 10 broadcast rights).
Just take a look at your posts and learn something. You could have mentioned 4 Pac 12 schools. Or none. But you mentioned ONE, the same one you've been talking about for months. Just change it up once in a while to throw us off your Duck scent.