- Joined
- Jan 24, 2018
- Messages
- 13,673
@Cane6 was correct, I was referring to the 2016 version rather than the original GOR (which is what is public, you can tell because it lists 2013 as the date). The assumption is that the 2016 version is more restrictivesee attached
I'd be incredibly surprised if you can do anything without a super majority.
Probably the more likely scenario in the short to medium term is an ESPN bankruptcy, where the contracts can get rejected.
Nope. Last year the Big 12 paid nearly $8M more per school. The ACC contract is truly horrible.
- The big question will come down to price. Media companies believe the Big 12 deal set the market. The Pac-12 still is aiming higher. Keep in mind, the Pac-12 will have fewer schools -- 10 instead of 12 -- after USC and UCLA depart for the Big Ten. That’s two fewer mouths to feed. ESPN took pains to make sure that its Big 12 deal would not result in a bigger per-school payout than the ACC. Because of the ACC Network, it’s difficult to determine how much ACC schools make from its ESPN deal. But I was told that the Big 12 will not eclipse the ACC on that front at any point during the Big 12's deal, which runs through 2030-31. ESPN is likely to approach Pac-12 negotiations in a similar way.
He's a mega idiot and Manny Diaz juggle the balls swallow the gravy (pause) type of guy.Who makes up insane bullcrap like this?
You should be banned solely on the grounds of posting false information.
From the Sports Business Journal LINK
While it may appear that the Big 12 is being paid $8M more per school...they're not. The ACC numbers made public don't include ACC Network revenue. That's by design.
I LITERALLY JUST SCREAMED WOULD YOU JUST SHUT THE **** UP OUT LIUD READING YOUR POSTS THE PAST FEW DAYS.Big Ten doesn't like small private schools either. Nobody does. The exceptions to that in football are short: Notre Dame, big gap, USC, and maybe Miami if we can ever stop tripping over our own ____ and get super relevant.
Yeah… I was told there’s a later version. The 2013 one hoops posted isn’t it. Seems like you know a good deal about it. Hopefully it’s 8 to dissolve the conference and we have 8.@Cane6 was correct, I was referring to the 2016 version rather than the original GOR (which is what is public, you can tell because it lists 2013 as the date). The assumption is that the 2016 version is more restrictive
The GOR presented here is NOT the current GOR. The one presented is the brief FOUR PAGE document that had a termination date 6/20/2027. That document was REPLACED by a new GOR document that is reportedly 30 pages long and has the contract termination date of 2036.see attached
I’m sure a conversation was had Tuesday like “Hey AD’s, can you do us a super duper huge favor and tell everyone you’re not actually mad about having a worse TV revenue deal than UCF?. Thanks!”Fact or fiction?
FSU AD: Drama 'overblown,' Noles 'thrilled' in ACC as league eyes new revenue distribution model
Florida State quieted concerns that several members of the ACC could eye an exit from the conference as the league's members near an agreement on a new weight revenue distribution model.247sports.com
There is also "supposedly" some wording in the new extended agreement that includes some wording addressing the members having rights to possibly terminate in the event of some sort of disparity in $$$ remuneration compared to "similar programs in other conferences". There was a journalist who had a copy of the new agreement, he read it and in HIS OPINION it is not iron clad but "malleable". To me the action by the "magnificent 7" is one to clearly establish the FACT that they are receiving significantly less remuneration in the ACC than "similar brands in other conferences".There were several iterations and addendums to the document. The 2012 version is basic and doesn’t reveal much
I’m having trouble finding it again, but in one of the 2016 addendums there was language about dissolution of the conference by way of a majority (currently sits at 8) of the schools leaving. I remember it specifically saying no penalties would apply….. that was about the only halfway thought out protection the schools put in for themselves
Hence why the top 4 are working to find the mid tier schools a new home
@Ispyin are you able to corroborate?