- Joined
- Dec 22, 2011
- Messages
- 47,465
Thanks for explaining it.... Tis why I added "If I'm correct".... I knew he had involvement but wasn't sure of the total extent....
It's all good.
Allow me to make this very clear.
BUT FOR THE GOR EXTENSION, the ACC GOR term would have come very close to matching both the Pac 12 and Big 12 GOR terms. Meaning, we could be joining the Big 10 right now without fear of reprisal or lawsuit.
The ONLY thing that has screwed us up is that god**** GOR extension.
Which is why I 1000% support an immediate Florida state or federal court contractual lawsuit asking for a declaratory judgment on TWO issues:
1. Whether the GOR EXTENSION provided adequate NEW AND VALUABLE consideration for the extension of time, or should the GOR extension be stricken as an invalid contract. And for the non-lawyers on the board, NO, a separate contract (ESPN's new TV deal to do the ACC Network) does NOT constitute adequate consideration.
2. Whether the ACC Commissioner had the unilateral and unapproved right to extend ESPN's contract to opt into the remaining option years of the TV deal from the agreed upon 2021 date to the unapproved 2025 date, in violation of the terms of the ACC Constitution.
That's it. If we win on either (or both) of those questions, we can leave the ACC whenever we choose to do so.