Strength of schedule is a garbage stat. Indiana’s went up like 50 spots after they played OSU. So they got rewarded for losing. Not to mention the difference in 20-30 spots is minuscule.Strengths of schedule worse than Miami that will be in playoff (not counting Oregon):
View attachment 313092
No worries, just keep it where it is. Charlotte is lovely in December,So, now it isn't a new product that needs to be built?
Maybe I spoke too soonBet Vegas always knows my *** first look at that line I knew it was bull****
We have no one to blame but ourselves (meaning the players and coaches).Watching these championships makes me feel sick to my stomach. All these teams are gettable. I don't see any big advantage of 10 of the 12.
It just makes our loss to Syracuse sting even more.
Very believable when you look at it closer.If a month ago (when I was watching this Clemson team get their **** rocked by Louisville) you would’ve told me Clemson would win the ACC and go to the playoffs and we would (likely) be headed to the Pop Tart bowl, I wouldn’t have believed it
I am. That's the point. The argument is all about Bama being over Miami.Who is arguing Miami should be in over Indiana?
I hear ya. The fact they have made it as subjective as they have is the main problem IMO. Since 11-1 > 10-2 , but 9-3 > 10-2, officially welcome to G5 status ACC.I am. That's the point. The argument is all about Bama being over Miami.
Noone brings up the obvious question of what the **** Indiana is doing so high.
Literally the Committee is ranking Bama 11 and us 12. Their exact argument can be applied to Indiana and us.
How many top 25 wins does Indiana have? Lol their only "good" win was against Michigan, which is like a 7 win team lol.
Almost like there's an agendaYou watch an SEC game and they’re screaming about how this team or that team is “100% IN.”
You watch this ACC game and they talk about strength of schedule not being good enough and nothing being guaranteed.
That's what the "committee " chair saidBut playing an extra game wasn't supposed to be a punishment...
Indiana has 1 loss. That's why. You could make the same argument against Penn State. 1 win over a #21 Illinois. Their other 10 wins are: West Virginia, Bowling Green 34-27, Kent State, UCLA, USC, Wisconson, Purdue, Minnesota, and Maryland. They played Ohio State closer than Indiana. That's it. That's their resume.I am. That's the point. The argument is all about Bama being over Miami.
Noone brings up the obvious question of what the **** Indiana is doing so high.
Literally the Committee is ranking Bama 11 and us 12. Their exact argument can be applied to Indiana and us.
How many top 25 wins does Indiana have? Lol their only "good" win was against Michigan, which is like a 7 win team lol.
They will just add more SEC teams. Wouldn't put it past them to add a 4 loss team in that scenario.So many flaws with the selection move to 16 or 24
You're not wrong really.Indiana has 1 loss. That's why. You could make the same argument against Penn State. 1 win over a tanked team in #21 Illinois. They're other 10 wins are: West Virginia, Bowling Green 34-27, Kent State, UCLA, USC, Wisconson, Purdue, Minnesota, and Maryland. They played Ohio State closer than Indiana. That's it. That's their resume.