Concerns for next year

We need to run the ball more frequently, and with physical intent, not flatfooted out of the shotgun. A warm weather balanced offense should feature 34-38 rushes per game, preferably the high end, like Georgia and South Carolina, which had 37+ last season. Stanford is very physical. They were a shade above 39.

Fisch was a ridiculous 30.9. That's volunteering to lose more than your share. He got too cute with the greed of scoring 40+ against stiffs as opposed to putting together a foundational style than can manage 24+ against top foes. Once you do that, the 40+ against stiffs will naturally tag along.

Morris needs better touch in the red zone. Along with running the ball often enough, that variable will dictate whether we we manage touchdowns or settle for field goals against top foes.

Against Florida, we'll own the energy and emotion for certain points early in the game but if it equates to field goals we're doomed, and it's ominous toward major games late in the season. Florida is going to wear us physically in the second half, just like their matchup at Texas A&M last season. We're improving athletically from position to position but Florida and FSU are simply more rugged and stingy.

Malcolm Lewis needs to be healthy. Pre injury I thought he was the second most clever and impressive newcomer last season, a special talent.

Defensively, just become a normal team. We haven't even been that. I've had to close my eyes at all the ghastly wide open spaces plays, when there's literally no defender in the picture and it looks like we're fielding 9 guys. Even in white uniforms we look skinny. Notre Dame made us look like twigs then the national championship game theme is now massive and strong Alabama looked in pre game warmups, compared to Notre Dame. Urban Meyer supposedly was turning his head in astonishment at the glaring difference between the two squads. I'm not a big believer in UTough. IMO, that's a crock, a band aid. You'll never catch up via that route. Get talented guys who are naturally huge.

Two or three disrupters need to emerge. McCord showed promise, also Terry. Porter is a huge piece toward mediocrity. That's meant as a compliment. I'm not as high on Pierre as others are. He gets too high and can be redirected. If anyone steps up at defensive tackle, that's a bonus. But when Golden concedes it's a fail I imagine he understands nobody will fully step up. The defensive backs are promising athletically. Very promising. Unless they demonstrate ability to take the ball away it won't matter. Lots of guys can arrive late and drop their shoulder. That blends to irrelevance after a while.

Punting needs to mature in a hurry. Botts didn't have a long transition period once he was the guy, but I remember all the hatred toward Bosher in his early days. I'd watch him in warmups and he was great but it initially didn't translate to the field.

Duke would last 2 games if we did that

Why? We've already showed a load of examples of guys - some even "smaller" and with less wiggle - who received a lot of carries.

Personally, I compare it to Jacquizz Rodgers' sophomore year. Rodgers was about 5' 7" 185 pounds.

He got 273 carries for 1440 yards (5.3 average).
He scored 21 times running the ball.
He caught 78 (!) passes for 522 yards (6.7) and 1 TD.
He therefore touched the ball 351 times as a smallish sophomore.

If Duke averages 25 touches a game - 20 carries and 5 catches - he'll touch the ball 288 times during the regular season. For us to get to the type of numbers Awsi has outlined, we'd have to implement some sort of read-option for at least 5-8 carries from Stephen Morris and Dallas Crawford. Then, the rest of the backs would have to chip in another 5-8 carries. I believe that would get us closer to the foundation we all hope to see.

that very well could be true and i agree that making that kind of commitment to the run will also take lots of pressure off the Defense and cause the D to march a safety up in the box thus further opening up the passing game for us.... but putting that much of a load on Duke is a big gamble. Plain and simple...as Duke goes our season goes. I believe we can even somewhat survive the loss of Stephen but without Duke we're a very one demential team.
 
Advertisement
and Duke has a HUGE impact on special teams. It would be very difficult to see him touch the ball that often and return kicks
 
My concerns:

Depth in the defensive backfield:
Outside of Gunter and Tracy I really don't know much about Larry Hope and others. They haven't had any PT. And I love Deon Bush and Rayshawn Jenkins but have never been impressed with Highsmith. I think Carter and Burns won't redshirt.

Running Back depth:
- Outside of Duke, who will we see get 5-10 touches per game? I really hope it's Dallas Crawford. I know everyone raves about him so I'd like to see it, and not just in the wildcat.

DT:
No need to mention my feelings here. But I will say I'd love to see Chick move inside from time to time.

LB's:
- They gotta stay healthy
 
Advertisement
If Porter stays healthy and plays like it's a "contract year," our DL can be okay. Pierre has progressed well in two years and can be solid. LRob as a fifth year senior i gotta think can contribute. One of the other guys will justify snaps. At end, Chick is okay and we'll hopefully get a rush from mccord, aqm or whoever else steps up. Not tremendous but can be way better than last year.

Lb can be a solid unit thisyear, particularly if ej doesnt get booted.

With bush jenkins, the newcomers and seniors in highsmith and rodgers, we should be solid to good again at safety. And our cbs, while still developing, will be competent.

All in all, wth a relatively easy schedule and an offense that should score, we can be competitive in all games.
 
Besides the depth, my biggest concern for next year is the mental make-up of the team. We have enough talent and experience to beat UF and FSU, an easy schedule, and a very good coaching staff. But this team has never even really been that competitive in a big game. I guess we sorta were against FSU this year, but it became clear by the 3rd quarter we'd lose. And Morris has yet to do it against a good team. I don't doubt that he can, but I wish I could point to a game from this past year and say "look what he can do against a good team. Now he's got another year and knows how to throw all over the good teams consistently." I just can't yet, and that is a big thing in college football. I do think games like NCSU and GT are important from this past year though, and the experience should help.
 
If Porter stays healthy and plays like it's a "contract year," our DL can be okay. Pierre has progressed well in two years and can be solid. LRob as a fifth year senior i gotta think can contribute. One of the other guys will justify snaps. At end, Chick is okay and we'll hopefully get a rush from mccord, aqm or whoever else steps up. Not tremendous but can be way better than last year.

Lb can be a solid unit thisyear, particularly if ej doesnt get booted.

With bush jenkins, the newcomers and seniors in highsmith and rodgers, we should be solid to good again at safety. And our cbs, while still developing, will be competent.

All in all, wth a relatively easy schedule and an offense that should score, we can be competitive in all games.

Agreed.

I know these kids have bought in to what Golden is preaching, but if we beat UF.......watch the fack out cause they're gonna buy in in a way we've never seen before! I almost shed a tear imagining the raisingcanes after that game.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top