Ethnicsands
All-American
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2011
- Messages
- 22,724
This is the important point. The idea that this kid’s success means skeptics of our OL recruiting were wrong is absurd. The evals that matter are those of our staff and too many of our OL evals have turned out badly for a long while.@HighSeas @GOCANES05 and @Calvin gave substantive reasons for liking this take based on traits they saw on film. Those are the winners. Everyone else that bashed him was wrong about him but the overall OL recruiting concerns were legit. We hadn’t exactly filled up classes with talent on the OL at that point.
It’s easy to understand why people were skeptical of Nelson given his size, rating and other offers (or lack thereof) ... and our OL recruiting struggles at that time. So kudos to the folks who took a view based on film and were right. They actually managed to put the noise out of the picture and assess.
The interesting question to me is whether there’s a learnable point in this eval to guide future OL recruiting. If we threw out hype, stars and size and focused on development potential and attitude, might we do better overall at OL recruiting?