forums

CB Xavier Lucas is transferring to Miami

View as article
Advertisement
Canes Legacy said:
Definitely possible. But if the Big10 is currently using that same template, there hasn’t been 1 other player that signed and transferred? Either way, Wisconsin has **** but well be portrayed as the bad guys.
Click to expand...
Maybe they tweaked it at Wisconsin. Templates can be customized from a baseline “boilerplate”
 
AtlAtty said:
Did UW hire lawyers who previously worked for and lost case after case for the NCAA? Seems like UW is receiving terrible legal advice between the handling of the Lucas situation, the subsequent defamatory remarks and now refusing to turn over what are clearly public records at a state university.
I guess sometimes you have to fight losing causes just to prove you aren’t giving up. But sometimes the smart money is on walking away.
As Kenny Rogers famously told us,
“you got to know when to hold em,
know when to walk away,
know when to run”
Click to expand...
Along those lines and glass houses, a fairly reasonable take from on3 recruiting

 
Advertisement
Ispyin said:
Maybe they tweaked it at Wisconsin. Templates can be customized from a baseline “boilerplate”
Click to expand...


I posted this on the other thread, but that's what I discussed with a (Wisconsin-born-and-bred) coworker this morning.

That Wisconsin apparently is adding the EXTRA YEARS (grant of rights) to the Big 10 template.
 
TheOriginalCane said:
I posted this on the other thread, but that's what I discussed with a (Wisconsin-born-and-bred) coworker this morning.

That Wisconsin apparently is adding the EXTRA YEARS (grant of rights) to the Big 10 template.
Click to expand...
Someone please explain to me why Lucas can’t just break any contract he may/may not have signed which may/may not be connected to the House settlement?
We know courts hate specific performance so no court will require Lucas to play for UW. And other than the return of any money that has been exchanged , if any, I don’t see how UW can prove specific damages. And we know punitive damages are extremely unlikely.

So in the end why would UM or Lucas even care if UW filed a lawsuit?
 
AtlAtty said:
Someone please explain to me why Lucas can’t just break any contract he may/may not have signed which may/may not be connected to the House settlement?
We know courts hate specific performance so no court will require Lucas to play for UW. And other than the return of any money that has been exchanged , if any, I don’t see how UW can prove specific damages. And we know punitive damages are extremely unlikely.

So in the end why would UM or Lucas even care if UW filed a lawsuit?
Click to expand...
The only damages I see is the revenue split from Lucas's NIL. Let's say Wisky says they would have sold 10,000 Lucas jerseys in the school store. The amount of money lost from that revenue share would be their damages.

Good luck actually proving up those type of damages though or any other revenue split from some above average defensive player. It's not like they are losing Travis Hunter or Caleb Downs that would actually bring in big money
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back
Top