Tears Cal Tears

[Empirical Cane]

This traitor ****...

 

[BigDikDaddyFromCincinnati]

That was not targeting. You could see 31 popped him in the shoulder pad area. We're not turtles and can make our heads disappear.

Unless it’s very cold outside (pause)

 

[Empirical Cane]

Wilcox Post-Game Presser...

 

[GojiraCane]

Is that man using a woman’s torso as a hood?

That one came out a little unusual looking, but decided to leave it in.

 

[BigDikDaddyFromCincinnati]

I love the “two illegal men downfield” crap to try to pile on the argument. Homie needs to check his rule book before posting stupidity.

 

[TheEye]

I hope they go all out when we play the Noles. That will be delicious.

“Holding. On the Noles.”

Every. D@mn. Play.

 

[Empirical Cane]

I’m as straight of a shooter there is, & I’m objective af.

In 2023, when our fans were bytching & moaning about the controversial Chaney fumble, my point was we should’ve never been in that position. We had a 99.9% probability of winning by simply kneeling. Was it a fumble? 99.9% no, but I could see how the refs blew that call. The point is, that one call wasn’t y we lost; it was a collaborative effort on OUR side.

Ffwd to last night; Cal fans can bytch & moan about a non targeting call. Could’ve it been called targeting? Sure, but it wasn’t & that ONE call is not why they lost. How about u had a 25 point lead in the 2nd Half. How about after we scored to make the deficit 17, Mendoza is cooking us, & for some inexplicable reason, Wilcox changes QB as Cal is driving for another score, halting not only momentum, but killing Mendoza’s rhythm. Instead of u scoring a TD to go up 24, u kick a FG to go up 20.

How about u gave up several 4th down conversions extending our drives.

How about ur CB misplayed a tipped ball for an int that would’ve killed the game.

How about u gave up a 70 yrd run & catch to our #1 WR when we were pinned at our 7 yrd line late in the 4th.

How about u gave up a 3rd & 20 to a wide open RB on a check down play.

How about u blew ur T.O’s trying to realign ur defense, only to give up key conversions.

When fans try to blame ONE play for a L, they r being disingenuous and shifting blame. If u’re relying upon the refs, that’s a bad game plan. VT fans can bytch (& I have no idea y) about the end of their game, but the fact is ur coach gifted us at a min. 6 extra points by not kick a FG late in the game, & squib kicking it, giving us great field position to score 3 points going into half time.

Blame ur coaches for these bone headed decisions, not the refs, & I said that against GT, too. It’s bull ****; we won, & took their souls.

 

[BigDikDaddyFromCincinnati]

Wilcox Post-Game Presser...

CRY MUTHAFUCCA!!!!!!!

 

[Empirical Cane]

That one came out a little unusual looking, but decided to leave it in.

Just say no brother.

That whole series reminded me of this:

 

[Cane_Mutiny]

Honestly, from what I'm seeing online, Cal fans by and large aren't really crying about the targeting no-call, they are (understandably) crying about their team blowing a 25-point lead. It's all the neutral busybodies acting like the ACC is rigging games for us.

 

[Virgil Cane24]

Woke

Go Canes!

 

[brcane1]

Honestly, from what I'm seeing online, Cal fans by and large aren't really crying about the targeting no-call, they are (understandably) crying about their team blowing a 25-point lead. It's all the neutral busybodies acting like the ACC is rigging games for us.

Neutrals that stayed awake are the ones ****ed.

 

[CaneSince07]

Cal tears ... Clowns thought they had a top 10 victory last night

 

[ristwasdown]

Use this when people complain. Balls coming out. No ref is calling it at 3.5 yards

 

[Empirical Cane]

Cal amfembians just embarassing themselves.

 

[OldhamA]

Wilcox Post-Game Presser...

My respect for him has grown immensely after that post-game interview.

 

[ristwasdown]

Use this when people complain. Balls coming out. No ref is calling it at 3.5 yards

Another view. Balls out in this one . Again, no one calling this

 

[IndayArtHauz]

Hang it in the Louve

 

[caneingville]

Everyone recites as gospel that there is a 3 yard exception for lineman engaged with and blocking a defender. It applies to any lineman blocking or not. See below.. Some caveats:

1. This is the 2016-2017 NCAA Football Rules and Interpretations and it may have been updated.
hit link --- > https://www.ncaapublications.com/productdownloads/FR17updated.pdf

2. The document is 220 pages long and I may have missed "an interpretation" of the rule. But I used the search function so I'm fairly confident that this is the entire rule.

View attachment 306230

Looks to be the same in this year’s rule book. Edit: looks like they just added the exception for throwing the ball away but that doesn’t apply here.

Here’s a link to the pdf: https://static1.squarespace.com/sta...1718382462820/2024-NCAA-Football-Rulebook.pdf

 

[RickySpanish]

His name is Salami...

And his last name is a type of mushroom. **** that guy