- Joined
- Nov 3, 2011
- Messages
- 25,141
I personally am REAL ok with the idea of a 6'5", 250 (projecting), super athletic linebacker...
6'5 LB.......sure buddy
Agree, 6'5'' 250=DE.
I personally am REAL ok with the idea of a 6'5", 250 (projecting), super athletic linebacker...
6'5 LB.......sure buddy
I personally am REAL ok with the idea of a 6'5", 250 (projecting), super athletic linebacker...
6'5 LB.......sure buddy
Dion Jordan
First of all, 'Bama routinely takes huge kids and makes them linebackers. Second, that's fine, lets say he is just an edge rusher...STILL want a 6'5", 250 lb, super athletic edge rusher.
If we're transitioning to a 3-4 or even looking for 3-4 personnel/hybrid players, this kid can play backer and put his hand down. Problem solved. Height won't limit a linebackers effectiveness. I'm more concerned about the kid's skillset and playing in space
I personally am REAL ok with the idea of a 6'5", 250 (projecting), super athletic linebacker...
6'5 LB.......sure buddy
Dion Jordan
I personally am REAL ok with the idea of a 6'5", 250 (projecting), super athletic linebacker...
6'5 LB.......sure buddy
Dion Jordan
6'3 240lb Safety....
Sean Taylor
just cause theres an exception doesn't mean ****. We've had possibly the best history of LBs in college football history and how many were 6'5?
Is Shannon still @ Ark?
If so, this isn't a surprise. They'll get more kids than you think from down here...
Just committed to Arkansas