forums

Brohm looking to push the conspiracy theory nonsense

751e2b1b-a685-4668-93cb-c76365ba3d25_1920x1080.jpg
751e2b1b-a685-4668-93cb-c76365ba3d25_1920x1080.png
 

Advertisement
CDWright40 said:
It was clearly an incomplete pass. The refs let it play out because that’s what you are supposed to do just in case knowing that replay will overturn it.

It was not really debatable.

Now enter Brohm in his post game presser- “it’s happened a couple times” implying that suddenly the ACC loves Miami. ***** move from a good football coach
Click to expand...

Exactly.i said that in the game thread.

They’re told to let it play out because if it is an incomplete pass review will get it ( hopefully in our case) but if its blow dead and they find out it was a fumble there’s nothing can be done…
 
Advertisement
CDWright40 said:
It was clearly an incomplete pass. The refs let it play out because that’s what you are supposed to do just in case knowing that replay will overturn it.

It was not really debatable.

Now enter Brohm in his post game presser- “it’s happened a couple times” implying that suddenly the ACC loves Miami. ***** move from a good football coach
Click to expand...

CDWright40 said:
It was clearly an incomplete pass. The refs let it play out because that’s what you are supposed to do just in case knowing that replay will overturn it.

It was not really debatable.

Now enter Brohm in his post game presser- “it’s happened a couple times” implying that suddenly the ACC loves Miami. ***** move from a good football coach
Click to expand...

1729382044430.gif
 
Advertisement
coffeecane said:
It is exactly the right thing to do to let it play out. Then you should expect the reversal.
Click to expand...
Yes, and no. The problem with letting it play out is that the film now has to show irrefutable evidence that his hand was coming forward with the ball. You know how easy it is for them to say, "There isn't enough to overturn the call on the field". If they take that little clause out, I am fine with letting plays play out. As long as you need extra evidence to prove you are right, it's pretty messed up.
 
ThomasM said:
Yes, and no. The problem with letting it play out is that the film now has to show irrefutable evidence that his hand was coming forward with the ball. You know how easy it is for them to say, "There isn't enough to overturn the call on the field". If they take that little clause out, I am fine with letting plays play out. As long as you need extra evidence to prove you are right, it's pretty messed up.
Click to expand...
I get you. If it's perceived obvious on the field then don't let it play out. But if it's close enough I think you need to let it play. Too me this one was close enough in real time. One replay was all I needed to know it was a pass. I think the refs looked at it too long. If they only spend 30 seconds looking at it, like they should have, no one is mad.
 
Advertisement
I didnt read all four pages of this thread, but here's my theory.

At the end of the Va Tech game, UM should have lost, but the ACC knows they have one team this season that can be marketed at a high level, and that UM. So they gave us the call against Va Tech.

Immediately after that, we began to see the national media begin to create a narrative that UM is getting favorable calls from the ACC (oh the muther fcukingg Irony!). Even though 2/3rds of the nation did not see the second half of the UM vs Cal game, the national sports media made **** sure they all saw the non targeting call at the end of the game.

Coming into today, it was clear that the announcers were told to play up that angle. They seemed hyper-focused on pointing out anything that the ACC officials missed against the Canes. I expect it to continue as the season progresses.
 
That crybaby butch called a timeout when there was no way they could prevent time from running out. Don't care what that sissy ***** has to whine about
 
Advertisement
SFbayCane said:
I didnt read all four pages of this thread, but here's my theory.

At the end of the Va Tech game, UM should have lost, but the ACC knows they have one team this season that can be marketed at a high level, and that UM. So they gave us the call against Va Tech.

Immediately after that, we began to see the national media begin to create a narrative that UM is getting favorable calls from the ACC (oh the muther fcukingg Irony!). Even though 2/3rds of the nation did not see the second half of the UM vs Cal game, the national sports media made **** sure they all saw the non targeting call at the end of the game.

Coming into today, it was clear that the announcers were told to play up that angle. They seemed hyper-focused on pointing out anything that the ACC officials missed against the Canes. I expect it to continue as the season progresses.
Click to expand...
The VT call was insane. Half of both rosters were lying out of bounds. None of these games should have been even gotten to these ‘conspiracies.’

We were 2nd and 3 with the clock rolling. Just keep mashing the ball in that scenario.

We are not strong with situational football.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top