He’s good to go.
That his amazing news!! He looks like he can contribut early, and Harvey is obviously special. Really want Boykin, and I feel good about the position going foward. Have to stack the trenches!
He’s good to go.
He was mediocre in games this year, we need more options at DT badly
might be better than Clemson's Dline next year. They're losing 3 first rounders on the DlineThis kid, the UCLA DT and hill and the DL depth is second to Clemson in the ACC. Gives us to redshirt the incoming DT's if needed and able to bring Jordan miller along slowly.
Want him and the uCLA kid like RIGHT NOW. This kid looks like he can start as our 1 tech. The best option we have there is Pat Bethel and that isn't good enough.
Nesta needs to be brought along slowly as well as Miller. You inject those 2 dts and were good to go.
Why not, They owe us for Sunny.
Has there been any conversation on Hill from VT? I have not seen if the staff is after him or not. Anyone know?If we grab UCLA DT and Hill from VT, Miami will have the best DL in the ACC.
Clemson is losing their top 5 DL, and they haven’t recruited the DT spot nearly as well as they did when Wilkens and Lawrence and Huggins all came in.
Clemson is going to win all their games next season because their offense has a chance to be historically great, and last season they set a school record in points scored.
Lawrence
Etienne
Higgins
Ross
Rogers
They return 4 of 5 OL too.
Hyatt who was AA is a loss at LT, but they stole 5 star Jackson Carman from Ohio State and he is stepping in for Hyaat at LT.
He is probably already a more physical run blocker, just not as good in pass protection yet.
Seems like we’re only after UCLA DT.
why? We are bringing in 3 freshmen and are looking for a grad transfer and another freshman. Thats good enough alreadyWell we shouldn't only be after him. We need DT in a major way. We should be just hard after the other available grad transfer DTs.
why? We are bringing in 3 freshmen and are looking for a grad transfer and another freshman. Thats good enough already
And Miller.If we get the UCLA kid, we have two quality seniors, a sophomore who was the #2 ranked DT in the country and then Ford.
Ford is the wild card, but I think he is too talented and old to not contribute in a rotation. It’s his opportunity to show what he can do.
Yea I'm not sold on Ford either....he looked very bad ( pancaked) against Wisconsin....we need studs at DT against quality teams....I'd take two in the portal even if we have to sacrifice another position scholly to right the ship....I'm all about creating more competition in the trenches right now...If we get the UCLA kid, we have two quality seniors, a sophomore who was the #2 ranked DT in the country and then Ford.
Ford is the wild card, but I think he is too talented and old to not contribute in a rotation. It’s his opportunity to show what he can do.
And Miller.