Look, I may just be another idiot who was on the UM Law Review, but allow me to point something out.
And that "something" is the final sentence in the Force Majeure paragraph.
Now, I'm not denying that a lawsuit filed in Arkansas will give them a "home court advantage". Of course it does.
But the fact remains that THAT SENTENCE does not require Miami to play in 2020 or 2021. Furthermore, those hillbillies are just inventing "case law" by talking about how "home and home games are never scheduled more than 10 years apart". Yes, that citation was probably uttered by two different A-State administrators, thus qualifying as "fact" to Yahoo Sports and the NCAA.
However, there is a real world. And the rule of law. And just because those crybabies want to play "sooner" rather than "later" doesn't make it true.
I do love the fact that an institution of higher learning is citing Rivals (or Scout) to prove our future scheduling.
Blake James has a bit of work to do to shore up his position on why we can't play in 2020 or 2021, but I also don't think that is the sole issue that will determine the outcome. What he needs to do is to send a firm offer to A-State to play in 2026, and state that failure to accept the terms of the agreement constitutes a waiver of rights under the original contract.
I would much rather spend $650K to fight this and pay A-State nothing. Nada. Zero-point-zero.