forums

5-star TE Washington dominant at Paradise, talks Canes and Van Dyke

View as article
canesmang1 said:
Some you guys are rookies to this crootin **** and it shows. This is a 0.00% chance. I don’t know him or have I looked at any of his information but probably gonna end up at bama Georgia or Clemson
Click to expand...

Imagining this kid in the Clemson offense is pretty terrifying. I was skeptical when I first saw his highlights...didn’t jump out to me. But I am willing to admit when I’m wrong.
 
Advertisement
UMFarArcher said:
Let's put that number into perspective.

$100,000 equates to:
25 boosters agreeing to pay $4,000 lump sum, or spread over four years - $1,000 per year. That's less than $100 per month.

See how simple it is coming up with that much? Of course, the arrangement would be some up front, some along the way, and some at the end.

Twenty five boosters. $100 per month. And you get a freak player worth close to 10 points per game - by either making two clutch catches per game that sustains a scoring drive - or making two clutch catches that keeps the opponents off the field and from scoring - or actually scoring 10 points per game by one TD catch and also sustaining a drive that gets a field goal.

That's how it's done by the bag men - and they'll have their clubs and associations - and will pool their resources - so that no one even feels it. They'll **** away a hundred a month in a bar - that's their logic.

Or flip it - 4 boosters agreeing to pay $25,000. Spread over 4 years - that's still only $6,250 per year - or $521/month.

That's how you just MEET opponent offers. The arithmetic will vary depending on the agreement - but there's a lot of folks who can afford that much.

So you end up having maybe five of these groups per year - and you're soon STACKED with absolute, top-tier talent.

Those few that can afford more - can provide a smaller group - and those who cannot afford much - will have larger groups.

That's the game. You play. Or you watch.
Click to expand...

Time to form the CIS Humanitarian Fund non-profit.

We can build homes like Habitat for Humanity and by shear coincidence the first winning family of the "lottery" is Washington's family.
 
Advertisement
UMFarArcher said:
Let's put that number into perspective.

$100,000 equates to:
25 boosters agreeing to pay $4,000 lump sum, or spread over four years - $1,000 per year. That's less than $100 per month.

See how simple it is coming up with that much? Of course, the arrangement would be some up front, some along the way, and some at the end.

Twenty five boosters. $100 per month. And you get a freak player worth close to 10 points per game - by either making two clutch catches per game that sustains a scoring drive - or making two clutch catches that keeps the opponents off the field and from scoring - or actually scoring 10 points per game by one TD catch and also sustaining a drive that gets a field goal.

That's how it's done by the bag men - and they'll have their clubs and associations - and will pool their resources - so that no one even feels it. They'll **** away a hundred a month in a bar - that's their logic.

Or flip it - 4 boosters agreeing to pay $25,000. Spread over 4 years - that's still only $6,250 per year - or $521/month.

That's how you just MEET opponent offers. The arithmetic will vary depending on the agreement - but there's a lot of folks who can afford that much.

So you end up having maybe five of these groups per year - and you're soon STACKED with absolute, top-tier talent.

Those few that can afford more - can provide a smaller group - and those who cannot afford much - will have larger groups.

That's the game. You play. Or you watch.
Click to expand...
I think its funny people dont understand this is how it works. To think one person buys 1 recruit is crazy. No one cares about something they cant control to throw money like that at it. At least not someone successful enough to be able to buy a recruit. Its all about the boosters and fundraising events
 
88781
 
Advertisement
brock said:
True but I think Washington is completely more gifted at tight end than either of them to think about him switching to another position. Washington is a complete mismatch for defenses as tight end imo
Click to expand...

100%. I think the kid is 100% a tight end and if he progresses like he should, turns into a Gronk type mismatch nightmare at the next level. I don't think he switches, just throwing the Winston name out for kicks.
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
I see he's listed as ATH. Does he prefer TE or is he down for whatever?
 
This kid is a rich man’s Jimmy Gaines. He has all the gifts to dominate at the college and pro levels. Defenders can’t get around that body or out jump that wingspan.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top