umhurricane2511
Always Faithful
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2011
- Messages
- 7,940
It's literally one ****** post after another in this thread. Holy ****.
LMAO yall letting vernnole rattle yall, come on he should have lost yall when he said lingard was slow and burns is faster LMAO dude be talking out his a$$
He did thats when i snapped actually at that precise statement
Still waiting for you to quote where i said Burns was faster then LIngard
You didn't say he was faster, but you did say Burns' sophomore tape was better than Lingard's junior tape, which is just ******* ludicrous. I mean honestly I can respect trying to keep it real about recruiting, not being a homer, etc, but I'm not sure what it is you're trying to accomplish in this thread. If it's losing any credibility you had left, you're well on your way.
Thank you for correcting these fake got porsters on here...You think I care about internet credibility? And yes that 2:32 highlight tape Burns first 2 runs were more impressive runs then anything on LIngards.....Lingards was impressive too but THe first two rims were elite he showed elite athleticism and burst and agility. I agreed that LIngard is faster. How quick yall forget the whole board was saying Burns would be a 5 star after his sophomore year...but now his highlight is not elite?? LOL this board is full of sheep I tell ya..BUrns gets hurt and now hes "Slow as ****" GTFO mane
I don't understand why posters get all upset if someone says they don't see Lingard as the next great thing. It's just an observation based on what they see in someone's highlights.
Wasn't cooper a 5 star? Dude was the definition of average. And I'm not saying that Lingard is average just slashing that 5 stars don't mean a guarantee superstar.
I don't understand why posters get all upset if someone says they don't see Lingard as the next great thing. It's just an observation based on what they see in someone's highlights.
Wasn't cooper a 5 star? Dude was the definition of average. And I'm not saying that Lingard is average just slashing that 5 stars don't mean a guarantee superstar.
LMAO yall letting vernnole rattle yall, come on he should have lost yall when he said lingard was slow and burns is faster LMAO dude be talking out his a$$
Where did I say that that Lingard was slow and Burns is faster?? Ill be waiting for that quote
I don't understand why posters get all upset if someone says they don't see Lingard as the next great thing. It's just an observation based on what they see in someone's highlights.
Wasn't cooper a 5 star? Dude was the definition of average. And I'm not saying that Lingard is average just slashing that 5 stars don't mean a guarantee superstar.
You talking Graig Cooper I'm assuming here
I don't understand why posters get all upset if someone says they don't see Lingard as the next great thing. It's just an observation based on what they see in someone's highlights.
Wasn't cooper a 5 star? Dude was the definition of average. And I'm not saying that Lingard is average just slashing that 5 stars don't mean a guarantee superstar.
11.4 yards per carry an 8A ball. I can see why he'd have doubters... Sheesh.
I don't understand why posters get all upset if someone says they don't see Lingard as the next great thing. It's just an observation based on what they see in someone's highlights.
Wasn't cooper a 5 star? Dude was the definition of average. And I'm not saying that Lingard is average just slashing that 5 stars don't mean a guarantee superstar.
You talking Graig Cooper I'm assuming here