Notice of Allegations update

Jan 12, 2013 1 min read

Rumors are swirling that UM could be getting it's Notice of Allegations from the NCAA soon.

According to Barry Jackson of the Miami Herald, he says in his latest Miami Sports Buzz column that UM expects to receive the NOA "any day now". This is what we've been waiting for. It's kind of unnerving to me that we are getting this a couple of weeks before Signing day. But it's best to go ahead and get it over with I guess.

It's important to note that this is just the notice of allegations, not the punishment. Think of it as an indictment. We haven't had our trial yet. But, we'll get good idea of what we got coming our way based off of this report. Until then...

Click to expand...

Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Email Link

Comments (734)

View article View as thread

rsa coral gables

Jan 15, 2013

wait, will the NOA contain potential sanctions? i thought that is handled by the Committee on Infractions. Please clarify.

umhurricano

Jan 15, 2013

Posters are saying if the NOA contains certain language we can expect certain sanctions based on prior precedent. Still two separate documents.

rsa coral gables said:
wait, will the NOA contain potential sanctions? i thought that is handled by the Committee on Infractions. Please clarify.

CaneMutiny06

Jan 15, 2013

rsa coral gables said:
wait, will the NOA contain potential sanctions?

No. It will only lay out the violations we're accused of committing.

Shogungts

Jan 15, 2013

rsa coral gables said:
wait, will the NOA contain potential sanctions? i thought that is handled by the Committee on Infractions. Please clarify.

No, but it will let us know what we are up against and give us an idea of the ballpark that sanctions could be in.

SmokeyRone

Jan 15, 2013

They are gonna give more postseason bans, bet the house on that. We wasted two years "self imposing".

BigCaneAl

Jan 15, 2013

canesman said:
"lack of institutional control" vs. "failure to monitor".

USC was nailed with LIC and Ohio State with FTM.

30 scholarships over 3 years vs. 9 over 3 years.

3 year postseason ban vs. 2 year postseason ban (REALLY ONLY ONE YEAR WITH SELF IMPOSED BAN).

HUGE DIFFERENCE!

USC got a 2 year bowl ban and OSU got 1. They never self imposed.

C
canesman

Jan 15, 2013

UNC got a one year ban.

The NCAA is really out to get us if it is more than the 2 self imposed.

C
Chuckles

Jan 15, 2013

SmokeyRone said:
They are gonna give more postseason bans, bet the house on that. We wasted two years "self imposing".

This is my concern. I'm not expecting any sympathy for present good behavior. Unless of course we have good "political connections" (friendships, bribes, golf-club memberships, etc.) with the NCAA.

These folks inspire skepticism. I'm hoping mine becomes unjustified.

BigCaneAl

Jan 15, 2013

We need an emoticon or gif for "merged threads confuse the **** out of me"

Jan 15, 2013

whoopingcane has the inside scoop as usual. Thanks for the PM broseph!

SofaKingCane

Jan 15, 2013

BigCaneAl said:
We need an emoticon or gif for "merged threads confuse the **** out of me"

rsa coral gables

Jan 15, 2013

umhurricano said:
Posters are saying if the NOA contains certain language we can expect certain sanctions based on prior precedent. Still two separate documents.

rsa coral gables said:

wait, will the NOA contain potential sanctions? i thought that is handled by the Committee on Infractions. Please clarify.

Click to expand...

i thought so, but since this board is full of NCAA compliance experts with years of experience and hundreds of cases handled, i just thought my understanding of the process might have been wrong.

jhtheking

Jan 15, 2013

rokulika said:
whoopingcane has the inside scoop as usual. Thanks for the PM broseph!

Negged. This **** is old

Jan 15, 2013

jhtheking said:
rokulika said:

whoopingcane has the inside scoop as usual. Thanks for the PM broseph!

Click to expand...

Negged. This **** is old

You just lost yourself a customer

J
jakeman1

Jan 15, 2013

Chuckles said:
SmokeyRone said:

They are gonna give more postseason bans, bet the house on that. We wasted two years "self imposing".

Click to expand...

This is my concern. I'm not expecting any sympathy for present good behavior. Unless of course we have good "political connections" (friendships, bribes, golf-club memberships, etc.) with the NCAA.

These folks inspire skepticism. I'm hoping mine becomes unjustified.

If they do, good luck getting any cooperation from anyone in the future. I think they have to just stick with scholarship reductions and probation, with the bowl bans as already out of the way. They'd be shooting themselves in the foot for future investigations if they give more bowl bans.

Ispyin

Jan 15, 2013

Problem2 said:
Mizzou coach Frank Haith says glad to hear NCAA investigation at Miami apparently near end, says has not heard from NCAA
1:21pm - 14 Jan 13

**** Haith anyways

he may not have but I wouldn't be surprised if his Johnny cochrane has...

N
nadiamufdi

Jan 15, 2013

SmokeyRone said:
They are gonna give more postseason bans, bet the house on that. We wasted two years "self imposing".

Highly doubtful. Like others posted, UNC got 1 yr, OSU got 1 yr, and USC got 2, and they didnt self-impose. We self-imposed 2, including a conference championship game. Definitely lose scholarships, but Id bet that we are done with post-season bans

caneinpsl

Jan 15, 2013

nadiamufdi said:
SmokeyRone said:

They are gonna give more postseason bans, bet the house on that. We wasted two years "self imposing".

Click to expand...

Highly doubtful. Like others posted, UNC got 1 yr, OSU got 1 yr, and USC got 2, and they didnt self-impose. We self-imposed 2, including a conference championship game. Definitely lose scholarships, but Id bet that we are done with post-season bans

^^^^This. Unless there are significant allegation none of us know about, the postseason bans will not continue.

JimmyJohnsonsHair

Jan 15, 2013

caneinpsl said:
nadiamufdi said:

SmokeyRone said:

They are gonna give more postseason bans, bet the house on that. We wasted two years "self imposing".

Click to expand...

Highly doubtful. Like others posted, UNC got 1 yr, OSU got 1 yr, and USC got 2, and they didnt self-impose. We self-imposed 2, including a conference championship game. Definitely lose scholarships, but Id bet that we are done with post-season bans

Click to expand...

^^^^This. Unless there are significant allegation none of us know about, the postseason bans will not continue.

I hope you are right but I'm not as optimistic. The NCAA can pretty much do whatever they want. I think they are going to give us one more bowl ban just to avoid any possibility of a public perception that Miami got off with a slap on the wrist.