Or take a local kid with better competition, better film, and multiple p5 offers at 6'4" 290lb already. But with issues at tackle already take projects.Same thing though...Take a kid in the 255-260 range and project him at LT.
Or take a local kid with better competition, better film, and multiple p5 offers at 6'4" 290lb already. But with issues at tackle already take projects.Same thing though...Take a kid in the 255-260 range and project him at LT.
Or take a local kid with better competition, better film, and multiple p5 offers at 6'4" 290lb already. But with issues at tackle already take projects.
Horrible mentality and way to recruit with our tackle issues and depth...reason 76533010 Searles should not be here. This kid is a bottom of the barrel project when you have options available that are above and beyond what this type of recruit will turn into 95+% of the time. With the way this season and recruiting class are going I guess this is expected.Maybe they aren't done yet...
But again I already addressed this.
Regardless of what you think about this kid, or how good he is...Or how good the local kids are/aren't. There isn't a kid that is similar to this kid/fits this mold/style as a prospect. Our recent interest in him, Emmaus (sp?)/El Gammall as tackles, Richards and Carr that Ivins said we checked in on a couple weeks back...They are all the same type player, one that isn't available among the local kids. They are all LONG, developmental tackles that you hope have the flexibiltiy/length to play on the left side
Horrible mentality and way to recruit with our tackle issues and depth...reason 76533010 Searles should not be here. This kid is a bottom of the barrel project when you have options available that are above and beyond what this type of recruit will turn into 95+% of the time. With the way this season and recruiting class are going I guess this is expected.
Smh... Probably more to comeA new low jesus christ
Funny , Every bodies salivating over DJ Williams who is committed to App state.
Room for risk where? Our depth at tackle is nothing. I'm not even sure we have 2 starting caliber tackles on the roster okay and 85%.95% is a gross exaggeration, but I'll agree the play is a risky one...We have room for some risk if you think the upside is there with overall length/flexibility/athleticism
Schools gamble with kids like this all the time.
It's not about the position.They offered Smith and they don't play anywhere near the same position
You dudes are OL experts now, that's funny
It's not about the position.
Nah fam this kid will need at least 2 full years to gain 50 pounds.Is he a possible EE? That extra spring semester in the weight room will be huge for a kid like this
Room for risk where? Our depth at tackle is nothing. I'm not even sure we have 2 starting caliber tackles on the roster okay and 85%.
Nah fam this kid will need at least 2 full years to gain 50 pounds.
95% is a gross exaggeration, but I'll agree the play is a risky one...We have room for some risk if you think the upside is there with overall length/flexibility/athleticism
Schools gamble with kids like this all the time.
Nah fam this kid will need at least 2 full years to gain 50 pounds.