SevenNSeven
Junior
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2011
- Messages
- 2,273
Dammit Archer, I hate all the oorah schtick you shovel, but, in this, thou dost speak masterly.
Pretty obvious our guys are on their heels a lot due to the scheme and its complexity. Week in, week out errors over a long enough sample size, and you might want to look blaming the program instead of the operators.
Funny enough, due to our location and recruiting opportunities, how complex do we need to be in scheme and structure with some of the plug n' play athletes we have available? Especially in a conference isn't exactly brimming with high quality offenses? Anyone that wants to play the 'but we don't have enough playmakers' card, look at Virginia Tech's previous game against Duke. Even the blindest supporter of our staff would be pressed to admit that most of our guys on D would start for Duke. So what was different? When I watched the VT-Duke game, I saw a Duke defense that attacked the line of scrimmage, one with aggressive play from the front 7. When I watched us on Saturday, I watched a defense that was so caught up in their roles, on not having breakdowns if LOLgan Thomas would take off and run, that they played on their heels the majority of the night.
Yeah man, your post is spot on. I think our defensive machine needs a little less polish and a few more dents, if you know what I mean.
Pretty obvious our guys are on their heels a lot due to the scheme and its complexity. Week in, week out errors over a long enough sample size, and you might want to look blaming the program instead of the operators.
Funny enough, due to our location and recruiting opportunities, how complex do we need to be in scheme and structure with some of the plug n' play athletes we have available? Especially in a conference isn't exactly brimming with high quality offenses? Anyone that wants to play the 'but we don't have enough playmakers' card, look at Virginia Tech's previous game against Duke. Even the blindest supporter of our staff would be pressed to admit that most of our guys on D would start for Duke. So what was different? When I watched the VT-Duke game, I saw a Duke defense that attacked the line of scrimmage, one with aggressive play from the front 7. When I watched us on Saturday, I watched a defense that was so caught up in their roles, on not having breakdowns if LOLgan Thomas would take off and run, that they played on their heels the majority of the night.
Yeah man, your post is spot on. I think our defensive machine needs a little less polish and a few more dents, if you know what I mean.
Last edited: