305to954
All American
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2018
- Messages
- 22,900
Shaq wasn’t a great LB here?? Let me ask u because last year a lot of mofos in the base we’re talking about how the LB core would be sooo much better without shaq and always ****ted on him..how has that worked out?? Are guys making the same plays shaq did? No. You know why? Because he was one of the best LBs in the nation. To say he wasn’t a great LB is flat out wrong. To act as though he didn’t have instincts is also wrong. Shaq a only problem is he is a 6ft 240lb thumper in a different era of ball. Like I said I look at the top LBs 3 dwn in the league rn, from a size standpoint it’s wayyy different then in the early 2000sThat comment is what's wrong with fan analysis, IMO.
What makes a football player effective is what goes on in his head. How he processes the play, how fast, how he responds laterally, vertically, avoids blockers, gets to the ball, hits, anticipates. To suggest that Shaq and Beason were almost identical players in any respect is insane, imo. Saying 'athletically' is meaningless, also. Their football speed and lateral movement and hips were wildly different. There's zero purpose to that comment.
And shaq was not a great LB here. You may be too young to recall what great LBs looked like here. he was solid, pretty good, and a really good kid. ray lewis was great here inside. morgan was. barrow was. vilma was. there's a looong list of guys who played ILB at UM who were better than shaq, and I really like shaq, but let's not re-write history.
now if you comparing shaq to Ray ofc there’s no discussion. But with Beason and others as far as production at the position at Miami it’s comparable. And if shaq was in the league in 2005, he’d more valuable to the league. Bro that’s just facts. Appreciate the discussion tho. Respect your opinion