forums

What was the worse display of SEC bias against the ACC by the CFP?

What was the worse display of SEC bias against the ACC by the CFP?

  • Miami 2024

    Votes: 27 43.5%

  • FS💩 2023

    Votes: 35 56.5%
  • Total voters
    62
Advertisement
youngcanefanatic said:
While both were bad, I believe ours is far worse. FS💩 got snubbed because of injury and the world seeing them as a worse team after. While we were snubbed because of the CFP’s work. Like they had to play around with the rankings to make their hypocritical reason to snub us. At the end of the day both show how weak the ACC is (not the teams).

*Also for the record. At the end of the day, this all falls back to being on us
Click to expand...

I am disappointed and think Bama's L to Oklahoma should have meant more

In the end, Bama played ALOT more top 25 teams AND had a better record
- Our argument of having a better record against bowl eligible teams on the road ......kinda weak
 
ncncanes said:
I am disappointed and think Bama's L to Oklahoma should have meant more

In the end, Bama played ALOT more top 25 teams AND had a better record
- Our argument of having a better record against bowl eligible teams on the road ......kinda weak
Click to expand...

Neither UM nor Alabama “deserved” to get in. We missed ACC championship game and they missed theirs plus had an ugly loss to Oklahoma. I think the complaint boils down to

neither of us deserved it, but Miami didn’t deserve it less than Bama didn’t deserve it.
 
If it is based on SOS

Why in the world does Indiana get in? Best win Washington? Bad loss to OSU 38-15.

11-1 with 65th sos vs 10-2 at 55 vs 9-3 in top 15.

ND 57th
Lost to NIU
Best wins 8-4 atm, 8-4 UL, army/navy

Even PSU 36th
Best win vs Illinois.

Then you have Boise State/UNLV 86/107 and Arizona State/iowa st 72/68.

SMU at 75, Clemson at 53.

If that is any indicator, these teams will be getting whipped in the cfp.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top