No, no, no, I don't think you do understand my point... or possibly I am doing a poor job communicating it. Forget who you "associate yourself with," or the impulse to clean house in a culture sweep, or any optics at all for that matter. Just think about making the very best hires we can.
Just read this part again, and zoom out, and think of all the great coaches that are out there at 40 different programs that are better than we are now, and add in some NFL seasoning, and then again, consider that we now have the budget to draw a theoretically much better staff than we have now:
What are the odds, that the very best we can do at (name a coaching position) is a person who was part of a 7-5 (13-12 last two years) program that just fired their coach? Is a person who's best employment opportunity was to work under Manny Diaz who finished his first year with losses to FIU and LTech, and got throttled by UNC to record levels to end last year? Is a person who happened to already be here making half of what we now have budgeted for the position?