- Joined
- Jan 30, 2012
- Messages
- 14,796
It was the way we schemed for the game to not let Louisville get deep, rush with only four, and force the QB to make good decisions. I’m the first half it worked great.
Second half, Louisville adjusted and I wouldn’t say I liked the way we played their adjustments.
I appreciate the explanation. Can you clarify — “Second half, Louisville adjusted and I wouldn’t say I liked the way we played their adjustments”. You didn’t like Baker’s response schematically, you didn’t like the way our CBs played, or both?
Ivey was just so bad in the UAB game that I was expecting UL to go right at him. Of course we had Bolden on Atwell a lot which also surprised me. So I’m trying to understand if Baker devised a scheme that took the pressure off Ivey (and Couch to a lesser extent) or if UL didn’t exploit our weaknesses or if Ivey and the other CBs actually held up well in the first half? And then what happened that caused the breakdown in the second half?