I think I have a pretty good eye for talent and I don't think my age changes that but if you disagree that's fine with me. You watch Rosemy and Canion and tell me who you think the better and more polished receiver is.
You can have an eye all you want but you need understand growth potential. I don’t care who’s better now...I care about who’s going to be better 3 years from now.
Marcus right now until it changes is 6’1 180 running a 4.84 lasered. Sure he’s a great route runner and has great hands but route running at 4.84 can only take you so far but everybody he’ll be going against players in college will be faster than him and catch up. Just for reference so have a idea, Brevin at 250 ran 4.78.
Elijah is a 6’3 190 track kid who you can tell on tape without a verified time like Rosemy that’s he’s runnnig at minimum a high 4.4-4.5 time. He’s an average route runner up with above average hands and he actually averages more yards per reception than Marcus does.
So now that we broke it down, let’s get to the bigger picture
So WR 1 runs a 4.8 but is a great route runner with glue hands. I can teach somebody how to run routes all day long so I really look for from high school to college is if he’s knowledgeable on running routes, is aware of his surroundings, and gets up field. Here’s where the 4.8 comes in, is he getting up field and breaking away from people, making people miss, extending plays? No, he isn’t racking up yards like that. He’s most winning matchups with route running then out jumping people and when he does scamper away he’s always caught and never pulls away. That’s a very limited floor and ceiling as far as growth.
Now WR 2 is a 6’3 190 track kid so he’s not a strong kid but I know because he’s track kid that he’s not putting a lot of time in the weight room because of it meaning he’s nowhere near his ceiling or floor there weight wise or strength wise compared to WR 1. He’s an average route runner and I know his hands are good by the catches he makes in his videos. He appears to have a bit of wiggle, not much more or less than WR 1 but he definitely pulls away from people and has big play potential. I can also tell without verified times he’s running at very minimum 4.5.
Now since we’ve established that most of what 1 is better at I can teach 2 but most of what 2 is better at I can’t teach. So why should I take 1 if 2 has things I can’t teach that?
Look at it for yourself.
WR 2:
WR 1:
As I’m saying, talk to me about Marcus Rosemy if his 40 improves.