UCLA football

You literally have said nothing but continue to respond. Ggs
detroitbasketball dancecam GIF by Detroit Pistons
 
Advertisement
Im certainly biased in my estimation of where the 3 are in their development. Emory's physical attributes are my concern whereas Dante appears to be limited by the mental aspect. All we can do is project out and Emory looks like he needs at least 2 more offseasons to really even compete to start.

I've said Judd looks to be in the same boat. He may be everything the eval crew hopes and dreams but as a developmental player he is 2 or 3 years away from challenging anyone for playing time. My biggest issue is we need someone to challenge next year to play and I think Moore could do that.
Moore has played really bad against P5 comp, his only good games came against G5 & FCS teams.

We’d be bringing in a kid with a 1-2 TD to INT ratio (against P5) who is barely completing 50% of his passes.

He’s in the exact same boat as the other 2; the only difference is, he’s from Detroit & was a 5-star coming out of HS, therefore people believe he’s somehow going to magically play better in Miami’s Offense that hasn’t really shown to be as QB friendly as advertised. And that’s assuming we keep Dawson, we don’t even know if he’s coming back next year.

The solution to our QB debacle isn’t adding another kid with accuracy issues, he’d struggle just as much here (probably more actually), as he has at UCLA. The kid played in the Pac-12 for crying out loud, Pac-12 & Big XII are literally QB factories. If you can’t succeed playing in those conferences you’re gonna be sh*t out of luck playing Miami ball in the ACC lol.
 
Moore has played really bad against P5 comp, his only good games came against G5 & FCS teams.

We’d be bringing in a kid with a 1-2 TD to INT ratio (against P5) who is barely completing 50% of his passes.

He’s in the exact same boat as the other 2; the only difference is, he’s from Detroit & was a 5-star coming out of HS, therefore people believe he’s somehow going to magically play better in Miami’s Offense that hasn’t really shown to be as QB friendly as advertised. And that’s assuming we keep Dawson, we don’t even know if he’s coming back next year.

The solution to our QB debacle isn’t adding another kid with accuracy issues, he’d struggle just as much here (probably more actually), as he has at UCLA. The kid played in the Pac-12 for crying out loud, Pac-12 & Big XII are literally QB factories. If you can’t succeed playing in those conferences you’re gonna be sh*t out of luck playing Miami ball in the ACC lol.
Not many P5 TF are ready to go day one. Year 2 is usually where guys are ready to go mentally and physically. Accuracy was a strength of his coming out of high school he was close to 70%. I'm not convinced that will be an ongoing issue. I won't argue that Miami is the solution to anything offensively you win there.
 
Moore has played really bad against P5 comp, his only good games came against G5 & FCS teams.

We’d be bringing in a kid with a 1-2 TD to INT ratio (against P5) who is barely completing 50% of his passes.

He’s in the exact same boat as the other 2; the only difference is, he’s from Detroit & was a 5-star coming out of HS, therefore people believe he’s somehow going to magically play better in Miami’s Offense that hasn’t really shown to be as QB friendly as advertised. And that’s assuming we keep Dawson, we don’t even know if he’s coming back next year.

The solution to our QB debacle isn’t adding another kid with accuracy issues, he’d struggle just as much here (probably more actually), as he has at UCLA. The kid played in the Pac-12 for crying out loud, Pac-12 & Big XII are literally QB factories. If you can’t succeed playing in those conferences you’re gonna be sh*t out of luck playing Miami ball in the ACC lol.
Moore would need to be brought in with the point of view that he's a big ticket QB recruit not your guaranteed Day 1 starting QB for 2024. We would need to bring in another starting QB and have them battle it out.
 
Moore would need to be brought in with the point of view that he's a big ticket QB recruit not your guaranteed Day 1 starting QB for 2024. We would need to bring in another starting QB and have them battle it out.
That’s assuming another QB would want to be in that position.

The Spencer Sanders situation is enough for any upperclassmen vet QB to make a lot more demands before signing up with a team where he’s not gonna be the shoo-in starter.
 
Advertisement


That didn't last long

😂😂😂

What's his deal? I heard he's.. difficult. But that was coming from someone who didn't get along with him at all. And I know there's some background stuff, but ****.

In 3 years dude's gone from OC of the super bowl champs, to hoping his background check comes back clean at whatever random high school he ends up at.
 
What's his deal? I heard he's.. difficult. But that was coming from someone who didn't get along with him at all. And I know there's some background stuff, but ****.

In 3 years dude's gone from OC of the super bowl champs, to hoping his background check comes back clean at whatever random high school he ends up at.
From his agent:

Statement from Eric Bieniemy’s agent, Jason Fletcher: “Eric and UCLA mutually parted ways today as previously planned. He’s still getting paid by the Commanders. After interviewing for head coaching jobs last year, he wanted to stay active and busy. So, he decided to go help out Deshaun Foster, who is like his little brother, at UCLA as opposed to sitting out a year. The plan was always to return to the NFL in 2025, and he’s looking forward to the opportunities ahead.”

I’d like to see him say that with a straight face to know if he is ******* around.
 
What's his deal? I heard he's.. difficult. But that was coming from someone who didn't get along with him at all. And I know there's some background stuff, but ****.

In 3 years dude's gone from OC of the super bowl champs, to hoping his background check comes back clean at whatever random high school he ends up at.
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back
Top