I hear ya. If I was Burton, I would do the exact same thing. It makes business sense.
But part of the reason college became so popular is because, imo, it felt less commercial/transactional than the NFL. Fans feel an intense loyalty to their team, which spawns some pretty awesome rivalries. That intense loyalty partly, imo, derived from the fact that players were with you when the times were good and when the times were bad. The players and the fans were all part of one family. It's like that phrase: you can't choose your family, you can choose your friends. Players couldn't leave, so fans and players were with each other no matter what.
So when people argue: the transfer portal is beneficial for the players. After some thinking, my response is: yeah definitely on an individual level. And definitely in the short-term. There's no doubt that Burton will likely benefit (Young will make him look much better than Stetson and probably increase his draft stock value).
But is it necessarily beneficial to the players in the long-term? Probably, but we'll see.
If what makes college football special, and therefore financially successful, is the loyalty and passion from fans. And that loyalty and passion is undermined by the transfer portal, then the ultimate product might become less popular. Less popularity equals less money from tv contracts and less donations from boosters. Less money equals less scholarship opportunities, less perks that come with being a D1 football player, and ultimately smaller NIL deals. That all hurts students.
It'll be interesting to see how this plays out in the next 5-10 years. I don't think much will change, but the transfer portal could end up doing more harm than good.