UGA had 8 3 stars last cycle. We have 6 now with Seymore decommit. We may have atleast 1 of those be bumped up. I don't think it's the 3 stars which is the issue. I think we need around 17 4 star or higher players to breach the top 5 depending on how the numbers pan out with teams going Portal heavy or not.Not to be a star ***** (even though I am one) and overly nerdy (also true) but we have too many 3 stars committed to end up top 5 right. The last 5 years, top 5 teams averaged 5 3star players and all had at least 3 5* players. We will need to get some bumps and land mostly top 150 guys from here on out.
That’s what I was trying to say if we are going to have a higher count of 3 stars then we need to have highly rated 4 stars. UGA’s signed 6 4* players in the top 100 in addition to the 5 5* players. That’s over 10% of the top 100… I don’t see us doing that as of todayUGA had 8 3 stars last cycle. We have 6 now with Seymore decommit. We may have atleast 1 of those be bumped up. I don't think it's the 3 stars which is the issue. I think we need around 17 4 star or higher players to breach the top 5 depending on how the numbers pan out with teams going Portal heavy or not.
For me average recruit ranking is a better barometer.
Yes their bar is pretty high, but look at the teams at 5 and 6. Those guys classes are attainable. And it might be more attainable with multiple teams that may not even finish in the top 10 even taking highly rated prospects like UL and Mich St. Basically the talent maybe spread out more.That’s what I was trying to say if we are going to have a higher count of 3 stars then we need to have highly rated 4 stars. UGA’s signed 6 4* players in the top 100 in addition to the 5 5* players. That’s over 10% of the top 100… I don’t see us doing that as of today
Keep in mind that with no 25 IC cap this year, classes will look a lot different than in other yearsNot to be a star ***** (even though I am one) and overly nerdy (also true) but we have too many 3 stars committed to end up top 5 right. The last 5 years, top 5 teams averaged 5 3star players and all had at least 3 5* players. We will need to get some bumps and land mostly top 150 guys from here on out.
Carver, Tripp and Emory will get bumps.Not to be a star ***** (even though I am one) and overly nerdy (also true) but we have too many 3 stars committed to end up top 5 right. The last 5 years, top 5 teams averaged 5 3star players and all had at least 3 5* players. We will need to get some bumps and land mostly top 150 guys from here on out.
All possible to probableIf Miami lands these...
We are the #4 class in the nation as it currently stands.
Tripp already got bumped down. He was a 4 to start. Still hovering right on the edge though so he definitely could go back up.Carver, Tripp and Emory will get bumps.
My expectations still are 9-15 range year 1 but **** Mario really steppin on people so **** if we have a successful season I could see top 5 ain’t no tellin
If we get 4 5 stars we. We need around 16 4 stars to crack the top 5. Texas had 2 5 stars, same as Ohio I think and both were 4 and 5. Texas had 20 4 stars.Miami can win the ACC every year with classes in those ranges. Top 5 classes these days are absurd and you need like 4 5-stars to be in the top 5. Mario should have top 10 or so classes every year. No excuse not to be in the ACC championship games most years.
Does the Coastal still exist?Need to win win coastal
Are we trending for these guysIf Miami lands these...
We are the #4 class in the nation as it currently stands.
trending heavily. I dont know if we will finish top 5, but what I am enjoying is Mario's recruitinf strategy. Just like with the coaching staff it seems like it took a while for him to build momentum because he was laying the groundwork. Now we are about to see a run of top 247 guys commit to the program and unlike past regimes, there are high quality Plan B and C kids that are constantly recruited.Are we trending for these guys