Huff seems to have the better body type and athletic profile for it - but his best attribute in HS was blitzing the QB (Pinckney's role).
That tape of Huff in coverage we saw last year during his recruitment is impressive.
Huff seems to have the better body type and athletic profile for it - but his best attribute in HS was blitzing the QB (Pinckney's role).
And we need that range back thereBolden should never be moved from safety. He's at his best back there.
Yup, stiffness and technique are Frierson's main issues. But when you listen to non-evaluators like Duasso talk about how the kid is a dawg and he's fast and he's a playmaker and yada yada....well you get unrealistic expectations. https://www.canesinsight.com/threads/where-we-go-from-here.136086/page-13#post-3418412 https://www.canesinsight.com/threads/damarius-good-commits.133819/page-7#post-3323532
TAC is a WILL imo and Harrell is the Striker. If Flagg and Huff prove they're ready soon then you can think about TAC at Striker. I have 0 expectations for Brooks much like I had low expectations for Frierson so that factors in.
I think frierson has the make up to be a great striker I think like many kids who get there first set of snaps they try to do to much and get beat badly. This will be a big offseason for him. Just needs to out there and play. Of all our lbs I would put huff at striker he has played in deep coverage(played safety at Aquinas good amount of reps). I like cave in the box he has alot of pop and brooks has been my sleeper for a while kid is really good imo he is gonna live in the back field only problem with him is he gives up on plays going back to highschoolYup, stiffness and technique are Frierson's main issues. But when you listen to non-evaluators like Duasso talk about how the kid is a dawg and he's fast and he's a playmaker and yada yada....well you get unrealistic expectations. https://www.canesinsight.com/threads/where-we-go-from-here.136086/page-13#post-3418412 https://www.canesinsight.com/threads/damarius-good-commits.133819/page-7#post-3323532
TAC is a WILL imo and Harrell is the Striker. If Flagg and Huff prove they're ready soon then you can think about TAC at Striker. I have 0 expectations for Brooks much like I had low expectations for Frierson so that factors in.
I thought physicality was Gil's biggest issue. He's not fluid like a corner but Romeo is stiffer than he is. Agree on Harrell as the striker of the future.
Frierson should be a strong safety IMOI’m glad someone has pointed out disappointing Frierson has been. I get the feeling he’s playing out of position. This “striker” position may not work for him.
Frierson should be a strong safety IMO
I think he has a better chance of improving in that regard vs playing in spaceIf he was more physical yeah, and he doesn't pop out as a sure tackler.
**** nah..Harrell is exactly what u want in a SS. Length and can tackle. But Cave is definitely not a extra safety. Moving him to striker, That would be dumb given what we ask from that position, witch is at time play man instead of automatically having to switch to zone if a team decides to spread you out with a late motion or 11 personell. Honestly I wish we’d sub a 4th CB more rather then deleting on a 3rd safety in Man v man coverage situations.Yup, stiffness and technique are Frierson's main issues. But when you listen to non-evaluators like Duasso talk about how the kid is a dawg and he's fast and he's a playmaker and yada yada....well you get unrealistic expectations. https://www.canesinsight.com/threads/where-we-go-from-here.136086/page-13#post-3418412 https://www.canesinsight.com/threads/damarius-good-commits.133819/page-7#post-3323532
TAC is a WILL imo and Harrell is the Striker. If Flagg and Huff prove they're ready soon then you can think about TAC at Striker. I have 0 expectations for Brooks much like I had low expectations for Frierson so that factors in.
Cave will come in and take his lunchI've said from Day 1 I would have kept Gil at DB. He looked a little stiff to play CB, maybe would only survive beating the **** out of kids on the line in press man, but i would have expected a natural progression to safety if nothing else.
Not seeing him at practice against higher comp makes it hard to see but Striker that early without seeing his progress as a DB surprised me. He never looked like a fit at striker.
Frierson can not easily play CB, why do you think he was moved. He is not a CB.Frierson is definitely not slow. It’s all about reps and confidence for him. He could easily play CB and perform well with more reps and development. The physical tools are there for him.