Ethnicsands
All-American
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2011
- Messages
- 22,724
I disagree we have a numbers issue here.I see what youre saying but I think its a numbers game. Remeber there are only 85 schollys and you cant have 15-20 percent of those schollys on d tackles. Also the 25 initial counters basically make u have to stick to a class of 25 at most. If you have other wholes and places hwere u need bodies or talent like we do at linebacker, O line and even cornerback I dont know if its smart to take 7 d tackles in 2 classes
At DT, for ‘20, we will have Silvera as a JR., Ford as a SR., plus Miller and the ‘19 Frosh, who aren’t even here yet. So basically, one guy who to date has underperformed, one guy who was a reach kid and redshirted, and three guys who have never suited up here, plus Silvera. We NEED DTs who can play.
At DE, we will maybe have Garvin, depending on of he stays, plus Rousseau, Harvey and Cam Williams. The latter two have never suited up for UM. Williams is supposedly an admissions Q but we’ll see. Then you have Phillips, who had to retire for concussions. Have to put a Q next to him in the CTE era. So we NEED DEs.
Roster room isn’t an issue, IMO. We should be able to take 25 with a bit of typical attrition. The question is where we invest the scholarships. My guess is 4 DBs, 4 LBs (one of whom can grow into a DE), 5 DL, 4-5 OL, 1 QB, 1-2 RB, 1-2 TE, 2-3 WRs.