D
Deleted member 25284
Guest
He was playing backer this season though. They moved him back to end because he’s their best player and he’s chaos at the hs levelSo like Brooks he'll be learning on the job?
He was playing backer this season though. They moved him back to end because he’s their best player and he’s chaos at the hs levelSo like Brooks he'll be learning on the job?
He's a mystery man. Our staff thinks he's the best LB in the state. Blew everyone away at Paradise as an off-ball LB. Still mainly a rusher at Killian.
Haven't seen enough of him but he is twitched up.
Absolutely correct. Davis is not a natural edge rusher like Freeney. I think he can be a very good backer. He seems to navigate traffic well and still finds the ball carrier. I really think his best position will be in the middleDon't care what he does outside of LB. He's not a DE. And before anyone says Freeney he's an anomaly. This board for years hasn't understood the definition of an anomaly.
Ed Johnson types. That kid was a bad man. And just like that, poof, he was gone.We’re not Miami again until we have people on the field who wishes everybody on the other team didn’t exist lol
Can you elaborate on that? Like maniacs in a good way or Willie Williams maniac?As long as they stay on the field, I love it. We need more of that energy from our LBs.
Troutman and Tyler have missed a couple games for fighting and Davis always seems to be mixing it up after the whistle. My only concern is staying on the field. I love the way they play.Can you elaborate on that? Like maniacs in a good way or Willie Williams maniac?
Wasn’t Javon Nanton like 6’1’’ 235, dude was a maniac off the edge in passing downs.He’s a DE all day. Not every DE is 6’5.
D; I’ve spoke on this & looking for a little insight. It appears we are recruiting a bunch of square pegs, but we are trying to fit them into round holes. I’m seeing this at the LB position, ATH position, and along the OL. Hence we see a lot of disjointedness. We see way too much growing painsHe's fast and athletic. No problem there. It's all about the mental transition from rush end to LB.
it's just about projecting where a kid is going to be best at the next level. this is true of scouting in any sport. just because a kid is playing a certain position in high school or college doesn't mean it's his best position when moving up a level. yes ideally you recruit at the level of bama or ohio state and can take the no doubt 5 star studs at every position and slot them into your team, but beyond that you have to be able to project. sometimes it's a slow process or doesn't work at all but we have had been plenty of recent success stories -- greg rousseau went from WR/DB to a top 15 pick at DE, deejay dallas went from high school QB to NFL RB, RJ mcintosh was a DE who became a dominant DT, kendrick norton was an OG who became a multi year starter at DT etc.D; I’ve spoke on this & looking for a little insight. It appears we are recruiting a bunch of square pegs, but we are trying to fit them into round holes. I’m seeing this at the LB position, ATH position, and along the OL. Hence we see a lot of disjointedness. We see way too much growing pains
He's back from the medical tent with a TFL!!
Great LBs come from a lot of different backgrounds. When you look at the recent first rounders, you see guys who were rush ends in high school, QBs, RBs, safeties and traditional linebackers. The common thread was speed.D; I’ve spoke on this & looking for a little insight. It appears we are recruiting a bunch of square pegs, but we are trying to fit them into round holes. I’m seeing this at the LB position, ATH position, and along the OL. Hence we see a lot of disjointedness. We see way too much growing pains