Thirteen weeks and counting...

[Canesfan1899]

clearly obvious they are doing it on purpose. Shouldn't take this long to type up only a few pages.

This, and it seems at this point they should've at least contacted the University to explain the delay. Oh wait they don't answer to anyone and can do whatever the **** they want.

 

[tsimonitis]

Anyone else still check Twitter on a daily, afternoon basis to see if NCAA set up a conference call for the following day?

 

[Consigliere]

Shocker.

New prediction, the week of October 27th.

 

[um101]

Both UNC and OSU waited 4+ months I believe.

 

[SmokeyRone]

Both UNC and OSU waited 4+ months I believe.

Yes, but both schools wanted the delay.

 

[samichesrdelicious]

I don't see how miamis legal side hasnt gotten this conclusion quickened or thrown out by now. Ncaa should be held to a certain standard in terms of professionalism and speediness that they haven't displayed.

Is Shalala and company were actually knockin' down the NCAA like we have heard here so many times, it would have been over by now. (Unless of course the "Shalala got this!" crowd think she is intentionally drawing it out over multiple recruiting years because she got this soooooo bad!)

I don't know what supreme court you were in front of, but you don't speak English very well, nor do you even attempt to address my points, smokey. This is akin to an admin process, not a duel in whatever courts you were in front of, fighting whatever battles you were fighting. I have no idea what you are referencing nor does anyone on this board. clean your own sh-- off your boots, big boy.

Let's face it. We are in full "Thank you sirs, may we have some more? (Bowl bans and skolly losses)" mode.[/QUOTE

You all have no clue how legal processes work, do you? There's no speeding along because of perceived influence. Shallala has not been in a position to do anything significant about this since we filed our motion to dismiss. The cards were played at that point and it was only a matter of time before the NCAA ruled; either f'n themselves and drawing out an embarrassing appeal with a ridiculous ruling, or offering some semblance of moderation and objectivity. It will come to a head soon and it will be a **** of a lot more than a few pages. Over/under on 50. End up being a wash with some scollies, 10-15. Big Q is LOIC.

3-0 in the US SC, 2-1 in the Ark SC (no small feat, most defense attorneys have a perfect 0 for life in the Ark SC, they are scum. Pryor/Clinton like racist Democrats) and a couple landmark wins in Federal Courts.

If you would like a sample, might I suggest Arkansas v Butler. Or perhaps, Moon v. White Trash? (ironic, still makes precedent but at the time, I had no idea what was going on, I just won in court, won on appeal and won big time with the supremes!) So don't tell me how the legal processes work, clerk.


Aww samichesrdelicious! Look at the wax buildup on these shoes! Now I want them cleaned, and polished, with a fine chamois! Chop chop!

 

[samichesrdelicious]

Try that again:

I don't know what supreme court you were in front of, but you don't speak English very well, nor do you even attempt to address my points, smokey. This is akin to an admin process, not a duel in whatever courts you were in front of, fighting whatever battles you were fighting. I have no idea what you are referencing nor does anyone on this board. clean your own sh-- off your boots, big boy.

 

[SmokeyRone]

Try that again:

I don't know what supreme court you were in front of, but you don't speak English very well, nor do you even attempt to address my points, smokey. This is akin to an admin process, not a duel in whatever courts you were in front of, fighting whatever battles you were fighting. I have no idea what you are referencing nor does anyone on this board. clean your own sh-- off your boots, big boy.

Tough guy, eh?