The idiot rule makers at it again

[breakingbryan]

Here's the part that frosts my ***.

The rule would allow for the ejection portion of the penalty to be reviewed through video replay. The replay official must have conclusive evidence that the penalized player didn't intentionally target a defenseless player in order to overturn the call on the field. Calhoun said the 15-yard portion of the penalty would not be reviewable.

Conclusive evidence of lack of intent? WTF?

​

Oh my ****. That's ridiculous.

• Adding a 10-second runoff with less than a minute remaining in either half when the sole reason for the clock to stop is an injury. Calhoun said the intent is to prevent players from faking injuries to stop the clock.

I thought that rule was enacted last year?

 

[OldhamA]

Here's the part that frosts my ***.

The rule would allow for the ejection portion of the penalty to be reviewed through video replay. The replay official must have conclusive evidence that the penalized player didn't intentionally target a defenseless player in order to overturn the call on the field. Calhoun said the 15-yard portion of the penalty would not be reviewable.

Conclusive evidence of lack of intent? WTF?

​

Guilty until proven innocent. It's the American dream.