The high and mighty sec

That's a 27% blue chip ratio, which is terrible.
And how many ACC teams are better? I'm thinking 4. So terrible-*** SC has a blue-chip ratio that would make them #5 talent team in the ACC. Are they that in the SEC?

Look, this is foolish. Like it or not, the SEC has a huge talent advantage overall. Say whatever you want about whatever individual team you want, but that conference has much more talent than the ACC and has produced many more good teams over the last 10 years. There's just no getting around that and it's not slurping to say so.
 
Advertisement
USC #10. Certainly they must have competed for the PAC-12 title. After all, the best indicator of success is the 247 composite. Right?
 
"Cincinatti? You mean the team that was only up by 1 against the trash Houston team?" Only joking.

We have no idea how good cinci is. We will see tomorrow. If florida played Baylor in the begining of the season I would have taken them over Baylor.
Why not in late October? Their 247 composite wouldn’t have changed.

Thank you for admitting that scores would have changed your mind. This is too easy.
 
No reason to dispute it. You are 100% correct. The SEC is the best conference because they cheat and spend the most money. They are a dirty corrupt scummy conf.
Right, and some people insist that this somehow means they aren't the best conference. Like how they got there matters. It doesn't. They have the most talent, they've done the most winning. It sucks and isn't remotely fair, but it's still true.
 
Advertisement
You should look in the mirror if you want to see someone dig themselves deeper. You have been porsting porst after porst in this thread. Florida doesn't even have a coach. Composite rankings are the biggest indicator of success. That is a fact. No team has won an NC with less than 50% blue chip ratio.
A bigger indication is coaching. The U has 15 years plus of proving that.
 
Right, and some people insist that this somehow means they aren't the best conference. Like how they got there matters. It doesn't. They have the most talent, they've done the most winning. It sucks and isn't remotely fair, but it's still true.
We are dealing with emotional simpletons. These are the guys that DM girls **** picks, then say they are fat and ugly after the girls tell them to fvck off.
 
Advertisement
“The best predictor of a game is the 247 composite”

“I would have taken Florida over Baylor early but not late”

Same guy.
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
Next year no games will be played. Just go by the 247 composite rankings. They tell us more than game results.
 
THANK YOU.

So maybe relying on 247 isn’t as reliable as looking at game results.
We are talking about a hypothetical scenario where these teams are dumped into another conferance before the season starts. Composite rankings are 100% the best indicator of success in that scenario.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top