i disagree.rankings by themselves dont mean anything, you need to look deeper to see what is behind those rankings. defensive stats are no different than recruiting rankings. in 2008 randy shannon had a top rated recruiting class, but that meant nothing because he was unable to get anything out of them. we had a defense that was ranked in the bottom 5% this past year, but why did that happen? it happened because we were forced to rely on young kids that were undersized and inexperienced. those are two things that are typically not a recipe for defensive success. when you have that many young kids and are playing true frosh DEs that weigh 235 pounds, having vince lombardi as your DC wouldnt make a difference. last year was basically a throw away year on defense that was ugly then but will be good for the futureWe're 120th in Total Defense...a.k.a how many yards per game we gave up. Despite what Dorito's retarded *** wants to say, it is very important.
Yeah you can start making arguments when you are talking top 20 or teams lurking in there somewhere. But when it's 120....you don't have **** to stand on.
I'm not a D hater. I basically plugged my ears and covered my eyes when we were on defense last year.
That said. 120.....yeah 120 matters. 120 matters A LOT going into next season.
i dont think it matters at all. did being a top 25 defense in 2011 matter coming into this year? 120 only matters going into next year because we should have essentially the same group, but should be much improved