T.Howard article on 24/7

MdCanesFan

OVERLORD
Joined
Jan 30, 2014
Messages
459
http://miami.247sports.com/Article/CB-Tracy-Howard-Credits-Darrelle-Revis-180461

Darrelle Revis surprised Tracy Howard with a phone call during his senior year at Miramar before a playoff game. Revis gave Howard a message that prophetically came true.
“You are in high school right now and you’re doing very good, but in college it’s going to take another level, another skill set,” Revis said.

Howard, who was the top-ranked corner in the country with 10 interceptions his senior year, didn’t think much of Revis’ words at the time, but during his freshman year at Miami, he knew exactly what Revis meant.

“I just thought, ‘I’ll be alright, whatever,’ but actually it does take another skill set,”
Howard said. “You’ve got guys out here running 4.2s and 4.3s so your technique has got to be swift, everything has to be in line, and you have to be mentally prepared. You know in high school it’s not that much. I watched film and always treated it professionally, but I really didn’t have to, to be good. In college it takes another mindset, it takes another skill set, you’ve got to get bigger, stronger, and faster, but I didn’t really understand and if I could give advice to somebody in high school, that’s what I’d give.”

Howard had 17 tackles with four pass break-ups in 12 games as a freshman reserve before being a full-time starter as a sophomore registering 35 tackles, one pass break-up, one forced fumble, and four interceptions.

And even though he hasn’t met Revis in person, Howard believes Revis has been a big reason why he’s developed into the player he is today.

Howard played wide receiver at Miramar his freshman year before switching to cornerback as a sophomore and to help him learn the position, he turned to YouTube videos. More specifically, he watched Darrelle Revis.

“He was the best corner in the game so I said let me watch him and I took his press technique and tried to master it and I got real good at it,” Howard said. “So I thank him even though I don’t know him.”

Howard believes the team-high four interceptions was just a starting point.

“I just set the stage, I feel I just gave people a piece of what I could do,” Howard said. “Now I want to put the whole thing together. Not just making plays on the ball, but plays on the run, doing a better job of getting off blocks, get my weight up—I just want to put the whole package together, but not just me, I want to bring the guys along with me like Deon (Bush), Rayshawn (Jenkins), and Ladarius Gunter. We want to put on a show. We want to show the coaches that we can play.”

The Hurricanes have completed their first two spring practices over the weekend and Howard likes what he seems from the team.

“As a team I feel it’s going pretty good, we have a lot of guys competing, a lot of guys making plays, a lot of guys getting better, we’re just having fun out here,” Howard said. “At the end of the day, football is football, but it feels different out here, guys are older. We’re having fun and guys are just getting better, that’s our main goal.”

On Sunday, he picked off a pass thrown by Kevin Olsen during 11-on-11 action and returned it for a touchdown.

“There aint too many things that feel better than a pick in this world,” Howard said. “That’s the best feeling in the world to me. That’s why I study so hard so I can get those. I had four last year, those are the best feelings even in practice you want to get those. I just want to make explosive plays and it felt good. We were in a man concept, high to low, and I just made a great play on the play from just listening to what my coaches tell me. I’m just out here having fun, I’ve been doing this since I was yay-high. It’s nothing new.”

Howard has been part of a heavily criticized defense the last two years which ranked 89th in total defense and 65th in scoring defense last year compared to 116th and 82nd in 2012. Defensive coordinator Mark D’Onofrio has received the majority of the criticism, but Howard insists it’s on the players.

“As a corner you have to have short-term memory and forget about it and to be honest I don’t think about it a lot, but of course everywhere I go somebody is always talking about the defense, ‘Hey, y’all need to do this, y’all need to do that,’ but it’s not on the defensive coordinator, it’s on the players,” Howard said. “Everybody runs the same defense. We don’t run no different defense than other people in the country. It’s not like we just have a magical defense and the other 117 teams runs something and then only UM runs a different defense. People actually run our defense and do good at it.

“The Seahawks run our defense and they do a great job of it. People who know football and watch film, it’s just that the players have to execute and the players have to trust and hold each other accountable and study and I don’t think that’s what we’ve been doing. But we’re older now and we’ve been natural born leaders since we were in high school so now it’s time for us to step up and hold people accountable, that’s something we weren’t doing.”

Howard pays close attention to the Super Bowl Champion Seattle Seahawks’ defense and hopes to apply things he’s seen with his current squad.

“I notice how they play as one unit, they’re dogs,” Howard said. “They are so hungry. If the ball is thrown over there, the other corner is going to sprint over there. It’s like their hungry and they feed off of each other. You can tell that they don’t want to let each other down and they don’t let each other down. They’re furious. That’s just over the years, that don’t happen in one year. We’ve been here two years now and going on our third year so I feel like we’re coming together, everybody has been playing together and I think that’s what it was with them. It takes years for people to gel, it doesn’t just take one year and as the years have gone on, we’ve gotten better and better. The only thing we can do is get better.”














I think we do run something similar to theirs (Seattle) such as our gap integrity and the "Tampa2" our back end guys play..I posted this not because I'm trying to defend D'No (it would behoove Tracy to do so, he hasn't made it big league yet enough to start yappin about his coaches) but to get some of you guys reaction to his comment on our D v Seattle's..I know the common difference would be talent but do you see Seattle's defensive scheme.........or nah?
 
Advertisement
take that you fooking Coach D haters.......LULZ

so TH is a fraud too....wow

sarcasm...

anyway it does make you think about what he is saying he is a key player on D and I assume a leader this year with Denz and Chick
 
It's very difficult to run Seattle's defense in College. You know who'd agree with me? Pete Carroll, who moved away from some of the things they do in Seattle while he was at USC (with pretty darn good talent available). Maybe we'll adjust, too.

This will turn into a ridiculous thread now. So, proceed.
 
His leadership as stepped up to another level and you can see it. He now knows he can do it all by himself so he is relying on his teammates to help him accomplish the goals that are set for this team. Tracy always had Cane Swag now he has Cane Confidence to go along with that SWAG.
 
Advertisement
It's very difficult to run Seattle's defense in College. You know who'd agree with me? Pete Carroll, who moved away from some of the things they do in Seattle while he was at USC (with pretty darn good talent available). Maybe we'll adjust, too.

This will turn into a ridiculous thread now. So, proceed.

I see what you're saying but most of Seattle's defense is predicated on.."see ball get ball." plus they have some dawgs on D. (effort and more talent).



I know I'm going TOS crazy posting links but here's an article kind of detailing Carrolls "new" type of defense but one that has most of the same Tampa2 principles..

http://www.fieldgulls.com/football-...wks-defense-history-pete-carroll-monte-kiffin
 
For those who talks about our players being neutered, have not seen this young man on the field. Him and Duke talk more isht then anyone. He will take his game to another level this year. As stated early him, scaryman, OP and Mc17 will have this defense doing bigger things them the past season. Can't wait!
 
Last edited:
It's very difficult to run Seattle's defense in College. You know who'd agree with me? Pete Carroll, who moved away from some of the things they do in Seattle while he was at USC (with pretty darn good talent available). Maybe we'll adjust, too.

That's definitely an issue. But what I think is the bigger issue is not the scheme, but the implementation and the adjustment of the scheme. This season, I want to see a game where our defense is the one dictating the play, not vice versa. I'm not down on D'Onofrio, but he has to show something this year. Not expecting a top-20 defense, but at least field one that doesn't fold down the stretch when facing quality opposition.
 
It's very difficult to run Seattle's defense in College. You know who'd agree with me? Pete Carroll, who moved away from some of the things they do in Seattle while he was at USC (with pretty darn good talent available). Maybe we'll adjust, too.

This will turn into a ridiculous thread now. So, proceed.

I see what you're saying but most of Seattle's defense is predicated on.."see ball get ball." plus they have some dawgs on D. (effort and more talent).



I know I'm going TOS crazy posting links but here's an article kind of detailing Carrolls "new" type of defense but one that has most of the same Tampa2 principles..

http://www.fieldgulls.com/football-...wks-defense-history-pete-carroll-monte-kiffin

The traditional tampa-2 defenses and the variants that came out of it are actually all based on upfield play from the DLine.

I'm not saying you're one of the people, but there seems to be a lot of confusion about 3-4 vs 4-3, defensive responsibilities, etc. We can play 3-4 (just like Seattle) and play the same coverage over it and look completely different because of what we ask the guys up front to do.
 
Advertisement
Like tracy saying its our fault my fault thats and nfl player right there !!!! Not like the % of kids who ***** about coaches... Your 17 who the fk are they.... Tracy the talent is coming to help!!! I cant wait to hear the coach d haters 2 years from now when we arent playing with jucos nobody wanted to fill depth and are playing with a full hand now that the ncaa has untied the rope....
 
It's very difficult to run Seattle's defense in College. You know who'd agree with me? Pete Carroll, who moved away from some of the things they do in Seattle while he was at USC (with pretty darn good talent available). Maybe we'll adjust, too.

That's definitely an issue. But what I think is the bigger issue is not the scheme, but the implementation and the adjustment of the scheme. This season, I want to see a game where our defense is the one dictating the play, not vice versa. I'm not down on D'Onofrio, but he has to show something this year. Not expecting a top-20 defense, but at least field one that doesn't fold down the stretch when facing quality opposition.

Last post I'll make in this thread unless the discussion becomes something different than what has already been re-hashed:

I'm not a scheme guy necessarily. As I've said 3000 times starting at the beginning of last season, what is the philosophy? I'll use whatever scheme makes us aggressive and proactive. I'm well-aware we've had talent issues or inexperience issues at certain spots. There isn't a singular answer to our problems. I just think it's a lot more likely we'll get good players in South Florida, so I rather focus on whether we'll make adjustments to become more aggressive (regardless of "scheme").
 
I must have skipped past the parts about how unhappy he is.

Oh well.

He made possibly the biggest leap on the team last year. While some may say his ceiling isn't as high because of his lack of athleticism, he can be one of the best corners in college with his skillset, without a doubt.
 
It's very difficult to run Seattle's defense in College. You know who'd agree with me? Pete Carroll, who moved away from some of the things they do in Seattle while he was at USC (with pretty darn good talent available). Maybe we'll adjust, too.

That's definitely an issue. But what I think is the bigger issue is not the scheme, but the implementation and the adjustment of the scheme. This season, I want to see a game where our defense is the one dictating the play, not vice versa. I'm not down on D'Onofrio, but he has to show something this year. Not expecting a top-20 defense, but at least field one that doesn't fold down the stretch when facing quality opposition.

Last post I'll make in this thread unless the discussion becomes something different than what has already been re-hashed:

I'm not a scheme guy necessarily. As I've said 3000 times starting at the beginning of last season, what is the philosophy? I'll use whatever scheme makes us aggressive and proactive. I'm well-aware we've had talent issues or inexperience issues at certain spots. There isn't a singular answer to our problems. I just think it's a lot more likely we'll get good players in South Florida, so I rather focus on whether we'll make adjustments to become more aggressive (regardless of "scheme").

I can accept that i just think its natural as more talent gets here adjustments to the scheme will be made .... Its only natural you get juco fill ins and are stuck with guys who have to play positions because were behind the 8 ball then its natural we look bad... Just so glad now that the talent flow will be so much better im 100% certain adjustments will come ....
 
Advertisement
It's very difficult to run Seattle's defense in College. You know who'd agree with me? Pete Carroll, who moved away from some of the things they do in Seattle while he was at USC (with pretty darn good talent available). Maybe we'll adjust, too.

That's definitely an issue. But what I think is the bigger issue is not the scheme, but the implementation and the adjustment of the scheme. This season, I want to see a game where our defense is the one dictating the play, not vice versa. I'm not down on D'Onofrio, but he has to show something this year. Not expecting a top-20 defense, but at least field one that doesn't fold down the stretch when facing quality opposition.

Last post I'll make in this thread unless the discussion becomes something different than what has already been re-hashed:

I'm not a scheme guy necessarily. As I've said 3000 times starting at the beginning of last season, what is the philosophy? I'll use whatever scheme makes us aggressive and proactive. I'm well-aware we've had talent issues or inexperience issues at certain spots. There isn't a singular answer to our problems. I just think it's a lot more likely we'll get good players in South Florida, so I rather focus on whether we'll make adjustments to become more aggressive (regardless of "scheme").

I'm with you there. I'd rather field an aggressive defense that makes mistakes over a passive/reactive defense that makes mistake. Plus, game experience for many of the defensive starters hopefully means you see guys playing off instincts as opposed to overthinking what they're doing on the field.
 
I am excited for the turnover in leadership on the defense. I think TH3, McCord, Deon and the other leaders will have more edge that Gaines, Rodgers, Highsmith and the crew which graduated and the dividends from this will show on the field.
 
It's very difficult to run Seattle's defense in College. You know who'd agree with me? Pete Carroll, who moved away from some of the things they do in Seattle while he was at USC (with pretty darn good talent available). Maybe we'll adjust, too.

This will turn into a ridiculous thread now. So, proceed.

Biggest difference is in the front DL... Scrap the R&R & play aggressive gap sound defense up front & we'll have the biggest defensive turn around in cfb history (Well maybe not history but B I G).
 
Advertisement
There's a reason our style isn't more wide-spread in college football. It's hard to implement and maintain over an extended period of time. It requires players to be physically more mature than your typical freshman or even sophomore.

How many teams in college run the type of defense we're asking our players to run up front, Bama and Stanford?

Does Stanford actually two-gap? If they do, their philosophy is different than ours. It seems like their DL fires off the ball attacking the OL as opposed to what ours does. Now I may be wrong and I plan on watching some of their games when I start to have football withdraws, but I don't believe ours is coached to fire off the way they do.

Now Bama on the other hand, pretty much runs what we do up front. But at the same time they can get pretty much get who they want and are also the closest thing to the NFL team in the NCAA.
 
It's very difficult to run Seattle's defense in College. You know who'd agree with me? Pete Carroll, who moved away from some of the things they do in Seattle while he was at USC (with pretty darn good talent available). Maybe we'll adjust, too.

This will turn into a ridiculous thread now. So, proceed.

THIS! THIS! THIS! We might run what Seattle is running and thats the problem, because PETE HIMSELF wouldnt run what he is running in the pros as-is in college. EVEN when he could **** near scour any end of the country and lure them to southern Cal, and he won a TON of recruiting battles to show for it. He could get any dlineman and he said it himself he couldn't, so he didnt try and he adjusted his scheme at the college level! The Dlineman bodies, no matter how talented werent mature enough to hold the point of attack. So instead he set those dogs loose, with great results, even when he had rivers, maulaluga, and matthews and they put up a defense for the ages.

When Pete got back to the NFL he went back to his original defense with some added wrinkles
 
It's very difficult to run Seattle's defense in College. You know who'd agree with me? Pete Carroll, who moved away from some of the things they do in Seattle while he was at USC (with pretty darn good talent available). Maybe we'll adjust, too.

This will turn into a ridiculous thread now. So, proceed.

Other than pressing in cover 3, which is unique, what did they do differently? I know they messed with fronts but they always played with a big safety down in the box and in that middle zone (Bing, Mayes). They didn't do very much blitzing either and either do the Seahawks.
 
It's very difficult to run Seattle's defense in College. You know who'd agree with me? Pete Carroll, who moved away from some of the things they do in Seattle while he was at USC (with pretty darn good talent available). Maybe we'll adjust, too.

This will turn into a ridiculous thread now. So, proceed.

Other than pressing in cover 3, which is unique, what did they do differently? I know they messed with fronts but they always played with a big safety down in the box and in that middle zone (Bing, Mayes). They didn't do very much blitzing either and either do the Seahawks.

Seattle's DLine plays more 2-gap and actually mixes and matches their 2-gap/1-gap in the same play more than Carroll did at USC. Carroll had his guys going upfield at USC. Mike Patterson flourished in that system.

While their physical dimensions are disparate, Patterson possesses the kind of one-gap quickness, the ability to penetrate into the backfield and blow up a play, that made Sapp one of the game's most dominant interior defenders. It is that innate quickness, and knack for being able to cut through the trash and get to the football, that first attracted scouts to Patterson. It is those qualities that will make him a high-round draft choice.
A few teams even have Patterson rated higher on their boards than Trojans teammate Shaun Cody, the more celebrated of the two, and with whom he formed one of the best college tackle tandems in recent memory. For the most part, those teams play one-gap defenses, schemes that place a priority on getting up the field. And while Patterson said last week he wouldn't mind playing some two-gap style, just to provide himself at another challenge, he is pragmatic enough to understand that his future is better served going to a team that turns its defensive linemen loose.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/draft05/columns/story?columnist=pasquarelli_len&id=2036243
 
Advertisement
Back
Top