hurricaneman
Recruit
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2017
- Messages
- 1,866
So it sounds like we had a 1A and 1A option at QB and weren't going to settle for less - and we'll end up with a QB worse than what we had last year.
I still don't buy the Howard narrative that all he had to do was sign. Even if that's what they told him, everyone "knew" Ward was Miami's main option, even if it wasn't true. That was the narrative. And narratives matter. I know it matters because they had to put out that 1A/1B bulls*** statement via insider guys and the press so that it didn't look bad for Howard.
The reality is you pick your guy, make him the belle of the ball, and ask for his commitment. If he doesn't commit that's on him and now Miami pursuing other options is in response, not in addition. Then you move on to "1B".
But this is the same mistake they eventually made with Ward. They lacked an outside perspective and were too lost in their own bulls***. From the outside, the Howard/Ward stuff timed so close seemed uncomfortable, people on this board talked about it. And then the prolonging of the Ward commitment seemed very weird. Again, multiple people kept saying that something is off but the staff clearly kept thinking it was near done. I get that if a guy has finalized an NIL deal you're feeling pretty good. But when that deal sits on the table for days, an then weeks, and the guy hasn't committed something is wrong. It took them way too long to see that. They should have realized it when ESD came and went without him committing.
I don't see this as a swing and miss. That implies, "you win some, you lose some". I see this as fielding a grounder as a second baseman and overthrowing the first baseman. You can't get the two best QB options in the portal on campus with the best NIL package and not land either one. That's a big time mistake.
Last edited: