Wrong. Even the NCAA speaks out of both sides of its mouth.
Read the language carefully. A player who transfers NOW (enrolls in January) would be OK, but a player who transfers LATER may not be OK. I don't know Kaidon Salter's situation, I just know he is not in the Portal yet, so if he doesn't transfer for the SPRING, he might get boomeranged by an overturn of the injunction.
Reading comprehension is a *****.
Yahoo Sports obtained the guidance sent to member schools in question-and-answer form. Bylaw 14.5.5.1, referenced in the Q&A, is the bylaw that requires an athlete transferring for a second time or more to sit a year before being eligible at his or her new school.
Question No. 3: Does the preliminary injunction enjoin the NCAA from enforcing Bylaw 14.5.5.1, as it relates to an undergraduate fall-sport student-athlete who transfers midyear (spring 2024), seeking confirmation of the student-athlete’s participation opportunity for the fall 2024 season?
Answer: It is not certain at this time whether the preliminary injunction will remain in effect during the 2024-25 season; however, as long as the undergraduate student-athlete transfers to another Division I institution during the 2023-24 academic year, the student-athlete will not be subject to Bylaw 14.5.5.1 during the 2024-25 academic year. The student-athlete would still be subject to any academic eligibility standards required for competition that may be developed or modified for the 2024-25 academic year.