forums

Second half defense

clg003 said:
lol decent… we held them to 1.9 per carry and bama held them to 4.2. They were rated top 10 rushing team.
Click to expand...

Context....these numbers aren't against ELITE rushing teams. Something can be said for USF's rushing attack....but can we do this against known rushing teams? The Michigans, OSUs, NDs? Not to mention, hard to run the ball when you're down 3 scores.

But I say decent because it's just not a tried and true product yet imo. Not meant to be taken as slander by any means. Just not measurable in terms of overall body of work through 4 games. Statistically, its good. Though and so I use a neutral term to describe it.
 
Advertisement
Santana Sosa said:
Context....these numbers aren't against ELITE rushing teams. Something can be said for USF's rushing attack....but can we do this against known rushing teams? The Michigans, OSUs, NDs? Not to mention, hard to run the ball when you're down 3 scores.

But I say decent because it's just not a tried and true product yet imo. Not meant to be taken as slander by any means. Just not measurable in terms of overall body of work through 4 games. Statistically, it’s good. Though and so I use a neutral term to describe it.
Click to expand...
They were a top ten rushing team and they played bama… you’re becoming a pretzel. We have one of the best rushing defenses in the country. Better than bama’s.
 
Caned Peach said:
Pay Me GIF
Click to expand...
Agree but dare say he’s going to get a head coaching opportunity at some point.
 
Advertisement
If our D showed up unprepared we should show up every week like that. Adjustments were made. This team has come together as one. This is an unselfish team. Gang tackling a lot of players around the ball. And on offense the blocking by the backs and receivers is off the charts as well.
 
We actually scared them pretty quickly into abandoning the run. That should speak volumes about what kind of run D we have.
 
Santana Sosa said:
Context....these numbers aren't against ELITE rushing teams. Something can be said for USF's rushing attack....but can we do this against known rushing teams? The Michigans, OSUs, NDs? Not to mention, hard to run the ball when you're down 3 scores.

But I say decent because it's just not a tried and true product yet imo. Not meant to be taken as slander by any means. Just not measurable in terms of overall body of work through 4 games. Statistically, its good. Though and so I use a neutral term to describe it.
Click to expand...
Not wrong at all but I am optimistic given how much proven talent we have in the front 6

Barrow, Mesidor, Baron, Alston, Kiko, Bain

We know it’s a legit group. We were a good run defense last year and we’ve upgraded
 
Advertisement
NCCanefan said:
USF set the tone with their bs hanging by our tunnel as we came out. I thought we showed great restraint. The HC is a jerk for condoning that.
Click to expand...
They definitely treated this like their Super Bowl… the team, fans and coaches for USF really brought that energy in that 1st quarter…

Thankfully Cam and the team weathered it and just kept pushing them down until it broke open and we had the back ups in cruising laughing as the fans exited
 
edge said:
Unprepared is a strong word. Honestly I have never seen a team try to run that fast of tempo. Most of the time even the referees were not in position on the snap. These guys made Chip Kelly at Oregon look slow. So I don’t think it was possible to totally simulate that speed in practice. At the end of the day they were going so fast they wore themselves out.
Click to expand...
yea. When we didn't break they crashed out.

Dawson took concepts from an opponent and used them last week; hopefully we incorporate concepts from USF (tempo & motions rub route with 38) that gave us trouble, and by seasons-end we're a more fast-paced offense. Chris Johnson's motion out wide and mismatch is a window into what our personnel allows us to do; should have been 6 but I'm sure Cam won't miss that throw again.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top