Richt assesses Perry after first practice

[OriginalCanesCanesCanes]

No, I added everything he said about QBs

Being cryptic. Perhaps Richt has already made up his mind on the QB situation having seen all spring what he had in the others, and seeing Perry in 7-on-7's.


Or perhaps nobody asked him a question about the others as would be expected with press like SDM.

Yes, that's exactly it. Richt has made up his mind but want's to build suspense and excitement by pretending to care that he's only seen Perry practice for 12 minutes. He's gonna keep on with his story about Perry needing to "learn the concepts", but we all know the truth. Don't know why you said he's being cryptic, I think it's all pretty clear.

Exactly.

It's only logical that his mind is made up after a half dozen throws in his first ever college practice. Rick is a master tactician, and we have some very astute porsters that realize he's being "cryptic" - but us really smart porsters know he's already made up his mind

Reading comprehension, deductive reasoning, and sarcasm are not on display with some poRster's on here.

But abject stupidity is.

 

[Mark Richt]

Rosier has proven he can win a game against a good opponent. He has had a year to digest what Richt wants. Unless you are really desperate you dont start a true freshman at QB. Perry needs some time to get to a comfort level . You don't want him getting hurt or losing confidence because he was thrown in there too early.Had Perry come in the Spring he may have had a better chance to play early but that didnt happen.

Proven? wtf? he won one game against Duke, a lesser opponent that only challenged us because our coaches and scheme sucked. Duke is not a worthy opponent that should be cited to prove a QB's competency. he played well, but it was DUKE.

i'm not in favor of one QB over another right now, but Rosier is not a good option, in fact none of them are.

Just talked to Blake, we're shutting down the program until the QBs meet your standards

 

[Dwinstitles]

It won't be on Perry to win the FSU game anyway...it'll be on a running game and the front seven defense. As long as he's coming along nicely, you let him start Week 1. When you start a freshman QB, you take the lumps that come with it. Risk aversion is for losers.

You stand zero chance of beating FSU by going in a shell offensively and attempting to ride the run game with no credible throw game. Like you said, risk aversion is for losers. That applies to going into a shell offensively too. If he can't run the offense, then he shouldn't be out there.

ni99a said the running game...........I think they will take that away and we have to stop cam akers he looks like the real deal

 

[Ispyin]

So you want Rosier to beat FSU and then give the job to Perry? Good stuff.

You can't make this shīt up

I said can not will. Read more.

I don't got us beating FSU right now. Which is why I said hand Perry the Keys during the bye

If Rosier starts and leads us to a victory over FSU, why in the world would we change QB's?

Key word is CAN. Reading comprehension my brothers

Ok, cool, he can. But why the **** WOULD anyone change a Qb that's 3-0 and beats their biggest rival on the road after years of losses.

that might be the stupidest post I've ever seen here and holy **** is that saying something.

 

[rsa coral gables]

Rosier has proven he can win a game against a good opponent. He has had a year to digest what Richt wants. Unless you are really desperate you dont start a true freshman at QB. Perry needs some time to get to a comfort level . You don't want him getting hurt or losing confidence because he was thrown in there too early.Had Perry come in the Spring he may have had a better chance to play early but that didnt happen.

Proven? wtf? he won one game against Duke, a lesser opponent that only challenged us because our coaches and scheme sucked. Duke is not a worthy opponent that should be cited to prove a QB's competency. he played well, but it was DUKE.

i'm not in favor of one QB over another right now, but Rosier is not a good option, in fact none of them are.

Just talked to Blake, we're shutting down the program until the QBs meet your standards

where did you talk to him? in the hallway at your favorite transexual glory hole? what a stupid post. f@ck off.

 

[LuCane]

It won't be on Perry to win the FSU game anyway...it'll be on a running game and the front seven defense. As long as he's coming along nicely, you let him start Week 1. When you start a freshman QB, you take the lumps that come with it. Risk aversion is for losers.

You stand zero chance of beating FSU by going in a shell offensively and attempting to ride the run game with no credible throw game. Like you said, risk aversion is for losers. That applies to going into a shell offensively too. If he can't run the offense, then he shouldn't be out there.

ni99a said the running game...........I think they will take that away and we have to stop cam akers he looks like the real deal

Where have you seen more of him? I've been trying to watch more video of his game.

 

[252cane]

It won't be on Perry to win the FSU game anyway...it'll be on a running game and the front seven defense. As long as he's coming along nicely, you let him start Week 1. When you start a freshman QB, you take the lumps that come with it. Risk aversion is for losers.

You stand zero chance of beating FSU by going in a shell offensively and attempting to ride the run game with no credible throw game. Like you said, risk aversion is for losers. That applies to going into a shell offensively too. If he can't run the offense, then he shouldn't be out there.

ni99a said the running game...........I think they will take that away and we have to stop cam akers he looks like the real deal

Patrick gone start at rb for them.

 

[gatorsSUCK!]

Why didnt a reporter ask Richt about Perrys weight? Most players lose what, 10-20 lbs throughout a season? He'll, in this weather he'll be down to frigging buck fifty in a matter of months . We really need access to Felder.

 

[We'retheBoss]

Rosier has proven he can win a game against a good opponent. He has had a year to digest what Richt wants. Unless you are really desperate you dont start a true freshman at QB. Perry needs some time to get to a comfort level . You don't want him getting hurt or losing confidence because he was thrown in there too early.Had Perry come in the Spring he may have had a better chance to play early but that didnt happen.

Proven? wtf? he won one game against Duke, a lesser opponent that only challenged us because our coaches and scheme sucked. Duke is not a worthy opponent that should be cited to prove a QB's competency. he played well, but it was DUKE.

i'm not in favor of one QB over another right now

Exactly. Let the best man win the job, but Duke don't prepare you for Doak.

 

[The Franchise]

It won't be on Perry to win the FSU game anyway...it'll be on a running game and the front seven defense. As long as he's coming along nicely, you let him start Week 1. When you start a freshman QB, you take the lumps that come with it. Risk aversion is for losers.

You stand zero chance of beating FSU by going in a shell offensively and attempting to ride the run game with no credible throw game. Like you said, risk aversion is for losers. That applies to going into a shell offensively too. If he can't run the offense, then he shouldn't be out there.

ni99a said the running game...........I think they will take that away and we have to stop cam akers he looks like the real deal

I'll buy into *** Akers when I see him do it. Problem that these guys are having is that they think UM can just lean on the run game and grind out wins. That's never happened here. This ain't Wisconsin. We are LOADED at the skill spots.

We need to find a QB who can run the offense and get the ball in the hands of those skill guys. That, in turn, will open up the run game.

If these guys think we're going to go to Tallahassee and line up in the I formation and play that old Big 10 run, run, pass game and beat FSU they're nuts. Never gonna happen. We haven't dictated the run game on them in 20 years.

 

[252cane]

Why didnt a reporter ask Richt about Perrys weight? Most players lose what, 10-20 lbs throughout a season? He'll, in this weather he'll be down to frigging buck fifty in a matter of months . We really need access to Felder.

Go to bed.

 

[BoxingRobes]

It won't be on Perry to win the FSU game anyway...it'll be on a running game and the front seven defense. As long as he's coming along nicely, you let him start Week 1. When you start a freshman QB, you take the lumps that come with it. Risk aversion is for losers.

You stand zero chance of beating FSU by going in a shell offensively and attempting to ride the run game with no credible throw game. Like you said, risk aversion is for losers. That applies to going into a shell offensively too. If he can't run the offense, then he shouldn't be out there.

Key to collegiate success is the run game. Last season, Miami ran the football 28(!!) times versus FSU. Pathetic. 33 rush attempts per game on the season...even more pathetic then that one game. You just don't win football games like that in this era of college football. Being a volume running team doesn't mean your offense goes into a shell. If it does, then thats on the scheme, not the concept. The best teams in college football annually, and the most electric offenses run the football at least ~40 times a game...maybe you see a minor deviation from that, but your examples will be few.

 

[BoxingRobes]

It won't be on Perry to win the FSU game anyway...it'll be on a running game and the front seven defense. As long as he's coming along nicely, you let him start Week 1. When you start a freshman QB, you take the lumps that come with it. Risk aversion is for losers.

You stand zero chance of beating FSU by going in a shell offensively and attempting to ride the run game with no credible throw game. Like you said, risk aversion is for losers. That applies to going into a shell offensively too. If he can't run the offense, then he shouldn't be out there.

ni99a said the running game...........I think they will take that away and we have to stop cam akers he looks like the real deal

I'll buy into *** Akers when I see him do it. Problem that these guys are having is that they think UM can just lean on the run game and grind out wins. That's never happened here. This ain't Wisconsin. We are LOADED at the skill spots.

We need to find a QB who can run the offense and get the ball in the hands of those skill guys. That, in turn, will open up the run game.

If these guys think we're going to go to Tallahassee and line up in the I formation and play that old Big 10 run, run, pass game and beat FSU they're nuts. Never gonna happen. We haven't dictated the run game on them in 20 years.

In FSU's 3 losses last year, teams averaged 39 rush attempts versus FSU. Louisville, UNC, and Clemson are not I-Form running teams. This isn't 1982, brother. In FSU's 9 wins over FBS competition...33 carries per game (that is a bottom 20 number).

 

[The Franchise]

It won't be on Perry to win the FSU game anyway...it'll be on a running game and the front seven defense. As long as he's coming along nicely, you let him start Week 1. When you start a freshman QB, you take the lumps that come with it. Risk aversion is for losers.

You stand zero chance of beating FSU by going in a shell offensively and attempting to ride the run game with no credible throw game. Like you said, risk aversion is for losers. That applies to going into a shell offensively too. If he can't run the offense, then he shouldn't be out there.

Key to collegiate success is the run game. Last season, Miami ran the football 28(!!) times versus FSU. Pathetic. 33 rush attempts per game on the season...even more pathetic then that one game. You just don't win football games like that in this era of college football. Being a volume running team doesn't mean your offense goes into a shell. If it does, then thats on the scheme, not the concept. The best teams in college football annually, and the most electric offenses run the football at least ~40 times a game...maybe you see a minor deviation from that, but your examples will be few.

I'd have to see the stats on that to buy it.

I do agree that we need to run the ball. I disagree with the idea that we need to be a run-first team that attempts to win games by ramrodding the run game. I think we would be better served to spread the field, pass the ball, and create big lanes for the run game through formations.

UM has never and probably will never be the type of team that wins with a run, run, pass mentality.

 

[The Franchise]

It won't be on Perry to win the FSU game anyway...it'll be on a running game and the front seven defense. As long as he's coming along nicely, you let him start Week 1. When you start a freshman QB, you take the lumps that come with it. Risk aversion is for losers.

You stand zero chance of beating FSU by going in a shell offensively and attempting to ride the run game with no credible throw game. Like you said, risk aversion is for losers. That applies to going into a shell offensively too. If he can't run the offense, then he shouldn't be out there.

ni99a said the running game...........I think they will take that away and we have to stop cam akers he looks like the real deal

I'll buy into *** Akers when I see him do it. Problem that these guys are having is that they think UM can just lean on the run game and grind out wins. That's never happened here. This ain't Wisconsin. We are LOADED at the skill spots.

We need to find a QB who can run the offense and get the ball in the hands of those skill guys. That, in turn, will open up the run game.

If these guys think we're going to go to Tallahassee and line up in the I formation and play that old Big 10 run, run, pass game and beat FSU they're nuts. Never gonna happen. We haven't dictated the run game on them in 20 years.

In FSU's 3 losses last year, teams averaged 39 rush attempts versus FSU. Louisville, UNC, and Clemson are not I-Form running teams. This isn't 1982, brother. In FSU's 9 wins over FBS competition...33 carries per game (that is a bottom 20 number).

UNC ran it 32 times. FSU ran it 43 times. Yet UNC beat FSU. That doesn't support your theory.

Louisville ran it a lot because Jackson was killing FSU with his legs and they had a gigantic lead by halftime. I'm guessing they did a ton of running once they got a 50 point lead.

Clemson ran it 38 times against FSU for only 133 yards. Clemson threw it 43 times for 378. That is a heavier pass than run distribution, which also doesn't support your theory.

 

[motorcitycane]

Y'all remember what happened Kaayas freshman year when Golden tried to protect Kaaya with the run run pass bs against Louisville. I hope Richt don't try to do that.

 

[The Franchise]

Y'all remember what happened Kaayas freshman year when Golden tried to protect Kaaya with the run run pass bs against Louisville. I hope Richt don't try to do that.

It didn't work. Need to be diverse and run a credible offense that features a real and viable passing game. Otherwise, we're fcked.

 

[BoxingRobes]

It won't be on Perry to win the FSU game anyway...it'll be on a running game and the front seven defense. As long as he's coming along nicely, you let him start Week 1. When you start a freshman QB, you take the lumps that come with it. Risk aversion is for losers.

You stand zero chance of beating FSU by going in a shell offensively and attempting to ride the run game with no credible throw game. Like you said, risk aversion is for losers. That applies to going into a shell offensively too. If he can't run the offense, then he shouldn't be out there.

Key to collegiate success is the run game. Last season, Miami ran the football 28(!!) times versus FSU. Pathetic. 33 rush attempts per game on the season...even more pathetic then that one game. You just don't win football games like that in this era of college football. Being a volume running team doesn't mean your offense goes into a shell. If it does, then thats on the scheme, not the concept. The best teams in college football annually, and the most electric offenses run the football at least ~40 times a game...maybe you see a minor deviation from that, but your examples will be few.

I'd have to see the stats on that to buy it.

I do agree that we need to run the ball. I disagree with the idea that we need to be a run-first team that attempts to win games by ramrodding the run game. I think we would be better served to spread the field, pass the ball, and create big lanes for the run game through formations.

UM has never and probably will never be the type of team that wins with a run, run, pass mentality.

Its not about being a run-first team, but running in volume, controlling the TOP is important in college football in this era. The defensive metrics that help support it like low yards after catch, yards per rush attempt, and opponent rush attempts are all building up to that idea of TOP in CFB. That doesn't mean they have to be B1G style ball...although, there is a reason why Ohio State, Michigan, and Wisconsin are among the better teams in college football..and, in the ACC, FSU and Clemson were running the ball 40 times per game. ACC's worst rushing teams...UNC (who ran above their year avg in attempts against FSU), Virginia, Miami, and Syracuse. Kind of a cap on how good you can be when you don't rush the football. You can get by against lesser teams...but when you play against peers or better...good luck.

 

[BoxingRobes]

Y'all remember what happened Kaayas freshman year when Golden tried to protect Kaaya with the run run pass bs against Louisville. I hope Richt don't try to do that.

It didn't work. Need to be diverse and run a credible offense that features a real and viable passing game. Otherwise, we're fcked.

I remember that game vividly...

They ran the ball 27(!!!) times that game.

 

[Memnon]

Y'all remember what happened Kaayas freshman year when Golden tried to protect Kaaya with the run run pass bs against Louisville. I hope Richt don't try to do that.

It didn't work. Need to be diverse and run a credible offense that features a real and viable passing game. Otherwise, we're fcked.

Balance is the key.

Our OL isn't built for old school Power run football, especially against an athletic Defense like FSU's.

We have to force their Safety's to respect the Deep Ball & the middle of the field in the Passong attack, otherwise they'll pin their ears back & bring heavy pressure on the QB.

You beat FSU by attacking the **** out of their Defense, that ultra conservative Run heavy Offense doesn't cut it & neither does a Checkdown heavy passing game either.

If we expect to finally beat FSU this year, it's gonna come from the Passing game opening it up for the run game.

You throw early on to push their Safety's back & then run the ball to keep their Defense guessing all game.

Uptempo, Quick attack, some Deep passes & no huddle run plays, gotta keep them on their heels.