Revisiting the sleeper first rounders

View as article

DMoney

D-Moni
Administrator
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Messages
19,921
One thing I like to do after every draft is go back and study the first rounders ranked three stars or below out of high school. There are less every year, as recruiting rankings continue to improve. But this exercise helps spot trends and mistakes. Let’s start with a pair of South Florida three stars:

Calijah Kancey, DT, Pittsburgh, 86.52 rating (Miami, FL)

Miami passed on Kancey because of size. I liked him, but my comps (Keir Thomas, Nikita Whitlock) underplayed his talent. His wingspan was the biggest concern.

Two takeaways. First, South Florida kids often make leaps in strength programs because they come in underdeveloped. Kancey tested poorly in high school and weighed 260. By the time he left college, he weighed 281 pounds and ran in the 4.6s.

Second, always pay attention to front seven players who play skill positions on offense. That is common among future first rounders. This is my report from the spring of Kancey's junior year:

Freakishly quick tackle prospect who reminds me of Kier Thomas (South Carolina via Miami Central). Light on his feet with the change-of-direction and tackling skills of a linebacker. Also plays some fullback and has legit next level ability at that spot. Only knock is size. Pittsburgh commit.



Zay Flowers, Boston College (85.07 rating, Ft. Lauderdale, FL)

Flowers was my guy because of his pure football ability. He was just as good on defense as offense, with explosive striking ability, timing and instincts. His recruitment was strange because he wasn't hidden- he played with two big-name recruits and produced on the field. His senior highlight was almost 15 minutes long. My takeaway is that we need more football players at WR. Very few of our signees played both ways, and aside from Restrepo (who played everything), there is a lack of toughness on Saturdays.

This was my writeup on Flowers as a junior (I think he made the right decision staying on offense):
Explosive two-way player who does not get enough attention. Gets off the line quick. Physical tackler and dangerous blitzer. He can be a stud WR but I love him on defense. May be the best football player on team with Kenny McIntosh and Josh Sanguinetti.



Devon Witherspoon, CB, Illinois (Unranked, Pensacola, FL)

On one hand, this is your classic "slip-through-the-cracks" situation. Witherspoon didn't play football until his junior year and he didn't qualify until after Signing Day. But if a Big Ten team can find him in Florida, that means their personnel department did a better job than ours. Everything you saw at Illinois is on his 10-minute senior reel: elite ball skills, striking like a LB, a sixth sense to diagnose and trigger. And he was named player of the year in the Panhandle. Maybe speed was a question mark (11.29 100M) but he was competitive in the high jump (6'7) and there were no speed issues on tape.

The takeaways: 1) Always pay attention to basketball converts who develop at a fast pace. That trajectory tends to continue in college; 2) Don't stop working in the summer. Some of our legendary players like Ray Lewis and Jeremy Shockey signed in the summer. I'd bet we didn't even watch Witherspoon's film.



Lukas Van Ness, DL, Iowa (85.3 rating, Chicago Suburbs, IL)

Every year, Iowa and Wisconsin produce three-star freaks that fit the same high school profile: Tall, multisport Midwesterners with room to grow. Van Ness was a hockey player (defender) through high school and went from 240 to 272 in Iowa's strength program. His athleticism isn't obvious on tape- he is straight-linish- but you can see his explosiveness with multiple blocked kicks. This is another story of an upward trajectory, as he didn't play varsity until his junior year.

If you're looking for someone who fits this profile in Miami's class, look no further than 6'6, Midwestern, hockey/lacrosse/track/basketball player Jackson Carver.



Jack Campbell, LB, Iowa (87.41 rating, Cedar Falls, IA)

See above. Campbell's sport was basketball, as the leading rebounder for the state champions. He is a clear beneficiary of the Iowa weight room, going from a lanky 210 all the way to 249 pounds at the combine. Surprisingly, he doesn't play offense or rush the passer despite his athleticism. It's all linebacker. He does show off his prowess on special teams, blocking multiple kicks and competing like a madman on kickoff.



Will McDonald IV, EDGE, Iowa State (86.14 rating, Milwaukee, WI)

McDonald is another tall, multisport Midwesterner who bulked up in college. He was always a basketball player (18/12) and knew nothing about football until he joined the team as a junior. He also lettered in baseball and track, finishing first in state in the discus (179 feet, 9 inches), third in the high jump (6'4) and setting personal bests in the 110-hurdles (15.53), long jump (22'4) and shot put (47'1.25).

His tape has all the hallmarks of a front seven first rounder: blocked kicks, big plays as a skill player, and high effort on kickoff. And his ability to bend was already special, resulting in 20 TFLs and 12.5 sacks.


Deonte Banks, CB, Maryland (86.48 rating, Baltimore, MD)

Two things stand out with Banks: verified track speed and two-way dominance. He was a beast on the track, with strong times in the 100M (10.98), 200M (22.44) and outstanding 22'8 long jump. And that speed translated to offense, where he ran for 1,700 rushing yards (15 ypc) and 24 TDs. People get mad when we talk about moving playmakers to defense, but this is what first rounders look like. His 11+ minute HL is mostly offense, although you see flashes of striking ability on defense and a few INTs.


Dalton Kincaid, TE, Utah (Unranked, Las Vegas, NV)

Like Witherspoon and McDonald, Kincaid was a basketball player who did not start playing football until late in his high school career. He played WR, signed with San Diego, switched to tight end and made third-team FCS All-American (835 yards, 19 ypc, 8 TDs). Josh Allen and Aaron Rodgers followed similar paths: nobody found them on the West Coast, they went to JUCOs for exposure and then signed with D1 schools. The last guy we signed like that was Beau Sandland, who didn't work here but ultimately got drafted by the Panthers.

Kincaid's high school clips show a surprisingly advanced receiver. He has a full array of routes, sinks his hips, plucks the ball and toe taps on the sideline. It's hard to understand how he ended up at San Diego.


Felix Anudike-Uzomah, DE, Kansas State (81.05 rating, Kansas City, MO)

Played basketball and participated in 4X200, shot put, javelin, long jump and triple jump. He almost went FCS and it took him a year to get on scholarship at Kansas State. His first step, balance, burst and motor are all there on the clips, but he's small. He added 45 pounds while keeping the motor and athleticism.


Tyree Wilson, DE, Texas Tech (88.13 rating, New London, TX)

Small-town Texas kid who was on recruiting radars but ultimately underrated. The first thing that stands out is the verified testing: he measured at 6'5.5, 230 in high school and ran 4.67 on the lasers. He also competed in sprint relays and the shot put (36'1). It's easy to see how that combo translates to defense. Wilson also played tight end. His highlights aren't available to the public, but the measurables alone tell a story.

So what are the common themes? All of these guys either played multiple sports, played both ways, or both. They competed hard and often blocked kicks on special teams. And they were all productive, even if they were raw.
 
Advertisement
I can’t say much about Texas Tech and Boston colleges staff, but what I can tell you is that the coaches from Pitt, Iowa. Iowa state, Utah, and Kansas state are some of the best evaluators of talent in College Football.

You see it every year from those programs. Real coaching is going on at those school.

I’m not a huge Narduzzi fan, but could you imagine what type of team we would have if we had one of those coaches. They would have a field day down here and probably would give a **** about the James Williams types
 
@DMoney who are some of the less heralded class of 2024 guys who jump out at you as meeting these traits, if any have caught your eye, or anyone else have a sleeper meeting these traits playing two ways, playing multiple sports plus some speed/athleticism???
 
One thing I like to do after every draft is go back and study the first rounders ranked three stars or below out of high school. There are less every year, as recruiting rankings continue to improve.
Here We Go Reaction GIF by MOODMAN


except probably not because of who is saying it this time.
 
Advertisement
@DMoney who are some of the less heralded class of 2024 guys who jump out at you as meeting these traits, if any have caught your eye, or anyone else have a sleeper meeting these traits playing two ways, playing multiple sports plus some speed/athleticism???
I want to hear what he has to say on ‘24 no doubt but Class of 2023 might be an easier reference because he’s had the chance to watch them.

‘Who in @DMoney ’s eyes falls into the under-heralded category with a chance to blossom, with his highlighted player-profile points serving as a barometer; even if that player was a top-1000 player by services, but just underrated compared to peers.’

Who did we and the elite programs already overlook that our fanbase will have a chance to monitor in college at their programs this coming year and going forward?

Not trying to put him on the spot, just thinking he’ll be more able to address the ‘23 class due to their senior tapes being available for eval, if he hasn’t already and I’ve missed it along the way.
 
The biggest takeaway from the First Round of this year’s draft might be just how few under evaluated guys there were.

The First Round only spotlighted how important star rankings are. Even at OL. It use to be people would say OL is a real crapshoot. But even that seemed like just a bunch of 5* guys.
 
I can’t say much about Texas Tech and Boston colleges staff, but what I can tell you is that the coaches from Pitt, Iowa. Iowa state, Utah, and Kansas state are some of the best evaluators of talent in College Football.

You see it every year from those programs. Real coaching is going on at those school.

I’m not a huge Narduzzi fan, but could you imagine what type of team we would have if we had one of those coaches. They would have a field day down here and probably would give a **** about the James Williams types

Narduzzi does a good job on defensive evaluations.

Offensively, I don’t think he has the same hit rate. He’d get about one season of offensive recruiting misses and then lining up under center with a fullback, before the honeymoon would be over.
 
Advertisement
I want to hear what he has to say on ‘24 no doubt but Class of 2023 might be an easier reference because he’s had the chance to watch them.

‘Who in @DMoney ’s eyes falls into the under-heralded category with a chance to blossom, with his highlighted player-profile points serving as a barometer; even if that player was a top-1000 player by services, but just underrated compared to peers.’

Who did we and the elite programs already overlook that our fanbase will have a chance to monitor in college at their programs this coming year and going forward?

Not trying to put him on the spot, just thinking he’ll be more able to address the ‘23 class due to their senior tapes being available for eval, if he hasn’t already and I’ve missed it along the way.
He mentioned one. Jackson Carver
 
When we create the environment where every player comes in a work like a blue collar worker, then we will find more underrated stars, we used to do it. NJoku was a 3 star as well so its not foreign to us. .8478, mid 3 star too.

And sorry i don't want man thats gonna ignore top talent. Most of them are rated right but thats why i like what Mario is doing which is a hybrid approach, getting on athletes even if or before their ratings get bumped up. Find the athletes. Great speed, great lateral ability, great leaping ability, great size 🐾🐾🐾🐾

Iowa and Pitt get these players because they cant compete for the elite talent. We can so we can scout these types and pick ans choose
 
Evals are so much more important than most people appreciate. It’s not just the three stars. It’s the freshmen, sophomores and juniors who haven’t been spotted by the camp circuit or internet scouts yet.

Many of those guys are unranked or underranked and don’t get their fourth or fifth star until late in the recruiting process. By then the cement has hardened if a good recruiter can get in early. Few elite recruits are like Sony Michel. Many more are like Ereck Flowers.
 
Great analysis, as always, @DMoney .

The real problem that Miami (and Miami fans) will always have is the inability to "trust" the evaluations by coaches. If we had signed any of those guys (with the possible exception of Cancey/Flowers due to their geography) our fans would have freaked the **** out.

As for the "ranking services getting better", let's just think about that for a moment. First, you pointed out that 10 of the 31 first-rounders were not rated very high at all, which leaves 21 that were. Of those, 11 were 5-stars and 10 were 4-stars. So we are still looking at a split of two-thirds blue-chip/one-third non-blue-chip.

Even with the myth of "247 only has 32 5-stars to represent what they believe are 32 first-rounders" (and 247 usually has more than 32 5-stars), we are still looking at a one-third hit/two-thirds miss ratio for 5-stars, which is fine and admirable, certainly a higher hit-rate than 4-stars or 3-stars. And since 5-star talent is usually the easiest to spot, and because those guys end up at the best schools that tend to be the best developers of talent, you get into a chicken-or-egg argument about what factor(s) put these 11 guys into the first round. I'm not going to belabor this much, but I think that the "5-star-to-first-round" hit rate has been fairly comparable over the years.

Now let's look at 4-stars. This is a category that HAS changed within the ranking services, as there are more and more 4-stars every year. One might argue that the ranking services are getting better in identifying 4-stars, or it could be fanbases (like Gaytor Nationz) pressuring the services to give bumps to their good 3-star recruits. However it cuts, it's "grade inflation" on a purely statistical basis, so it becomes more and more likely (over time) that the first round will be filled out with 4-stars, particularly 4-stars who would have been 3-stars ten years ago. ****, the Elite Eleven isn't just 11 QBs any longer, even THAT pool of candidates has been growing recently.

So then we can look at whether there are other factors in addition to blue-chip status. And of the 21 blue-chippers, they all went to P5 schools, and mostly good ones (the "worst" being Northwestern for Skoronski). In fact, 10 of the 21 went to one of four schools, Alabama, UGa, Ohio Taint, or Clemson, four of the schools that have perennially been in championship consideration. Again, it becomes a chicken-or-egg argument whether talent has made those schools great or if those schools make the talent great, but we can certainly conclude that when those schools get blue-chippers, they do a **** good job of making sure they reach their potential instead of flopping.

What I did find interesting about your non-blue-chip list is that 7 of your 10 pretty much benefitted from S&C, with 5 DLs, 1 LB, and 1 TE being guys who got bigger and stronger in college. So that tracks, and is interesting to compare to "body type" recruiting. You cited one of Miami's TEs who fits the bill of the 10 non-blue-chip first rounders (he has athletic skills and a frame to grow into), but I think it will be harder for Miami to identify DLs who are smallish coming out of high school.

I'd also point out that the dominant position for blue-chippers was OL, with 6 in the blue-chip index and 0 in the non-blue-chip group. Since this position group is a strength of Mario's recruiting, this bodes well for us. Where Miami definitely needs to improve its blue-chip recruiting is at the skill positions of QB, WR, and CB (I would argue that Miami has been historically and recently good at getting RBs, even if we've had some injury issues in the last year). Also, those positions are going to continue to demand a disproportionate amount of NIL attention, as some of our top targets recently were Rashada, Innis, and McClain.

As I said, very good analysis of the non-blue-chip guys, though I tend to disagree on the "recruiting services getting better" takeaway. There's certainly a lot more tape available, there are lots of camps and 7-on-7 stuff, but there are three diluted ranking services (since on3 poached a bunch of 247 guys) and lots of differences of opinion. What might be interesting to monitor is whether 7-on-7 flag football distorts the rankings for WR & CB, since there is no tackling involved and less overall physicality. In this first round, there were 4 non-blue-chip WR/CB guys (when you include the kid who grew into a TE), and 5 blue-chip WR/CB guys.

Bottom line, Miami needs to reach the level of Alabama/UGa/Ohio Taint/Clemson.
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
I can’t say much about Texas Tech and Boston colleges staff, but what I can tell you is that the coaches from Pitt, Iowa. Iowa state, Utah, and Kansas state are some of the best evaluators of talent in College Football.

You see it every year from those programs. Real coaching is going on at those school.

I’m not a huge Narduzzi fan, but could you imagine what type of team we would have if we had one of those coaches. They would have a field day down here and probably would give a **** about the James Williams types
That's just it. You are correct..... but the big issue is, would we as fans..... especially the ones that follow recruiting, be ok with losing out on the James Williams types and signing the underrated, potential "diamond in the rough" types. The answer would probably be somewhere near, "**** naw!" We wouldn't give them a chance to develop, before bringing out the pitchforks. I've had D1 coaches tell me, more than once, that "(insert name here) is good enough to play for us, but I can't sign him because he's not big enough." or the "he's not a big enough recruit (stars). Our fans would riot, lol." One was a CB that ended up playing at Oregon State. Even though the kid wasn't at my high school any longer, I reached out to a couple of contacts I had within the programs at UGA and USCe, at the time, to try and help him. Now this was before UGA became the machine it is now.... and USCe was well... USCe. Both told me pretty much the same thing. Crazy thing is, fast forward a few years, this same kid has been in the NFL longer than most of the CBs that either school had on their rosters at the time. Go figure.
 
Great analysis, as always, @DMoney .

The real problem that Miami (and Miami fans) will always have is the inability to "trust" the evaluations by coaches. If we had signed any of those guys (with the possible exception of Cancey/Flowers due to their geography) our fans would have freaked the **** out.
True, but this is most fans at most schools. Fans are crazy, lol.
As for the "ranking services getting better", let's just think about that for a moment. First, you pointed out that 10 of the 31 first-rounders were not rated very high at all, which leaves 21 that were. Of those, 11 were 5-stars and 10 were 4-stars. So we are still looking at a split of two-thirds blue-chip/one-third non-blue-chip.

Even with the myth of "247 only has 32 5-stars to represent what they believe are 32 first-rounders" (and 247 usually has more than 32 5-stars), we are still looking at a one-third hit/two-thirds miss ratio for 5-stars, which is fine and admirable, certainly a higher hit-rate than 4-stars or 3-stars. And since 5-star talent is usually the easiest to spot, and because those guys end up at the best schools that tend to be the best developers of talent, you get into a chicken-or-egg argument about what factor(s) put these 11 guys into the first round. I'm not going to belabor this much, but I think that the "5-star-to-first-round" hit rate has been fairly comparable over the years.

Now let's look at 4-stars. This is a category that HAS changed within the ranking services, as there are more and more 4-stars every year. One might argue that the ranking services are getting better in identifying 4-stars, or it could be fanbases (like Gaytor Nationz) pressuring the services to give bumps to their good 3-star recruits. However it cuts, it's "grade inflation" on a purely statistical basis, so it becomes more and more likely (over time) that the first round will be filled out with 4-stars, particularly 4-stars who would have been 3-stars ten years ago. ****, the Elite Eleven isn't just 11 QBs any longer, even THAT pool of candidates has been growing recently.

So then we can look at whether there are other factors in addition to blue-chip status. And of the 21 blue-chippers, they all went to P5 schools, and mostly good ones (the "worst" being Northwestern for Skoronski). In fact, 10 of the 21 went to one of four schools, Alabama, UGa, Ohio Taint, or Clemson, four of the schools that have perennially been in championship consideration. Again, it becomes a chicken-or-egg argument whether talent has made those schools great or if those schools make the talent great, but we can certainly conclude that when those schools get blue-chippers, they do a **** good job of making sure they reach their potential instead of flopping.
Facts. But the key here is getting so many blue chip kids, that the ones that do eventually flop won't stick out as much.
What I did find interesting about your non-blue-chip list is that 7 of your 10 pretty much benefitted from S&C, with 5 DLs, 1 LB, and 1 TE being guys who got bigger and stronger in college. So that tracks, and is interesting to compare to "body type" recruiting. You cited one of Miami's TEs who fits the bill of the 10 non-blue-chip first rounders (he has athletic skills and a frame to grow into), but I think it will be harder for Miami to identify DLs who are smallish coming out of high school.

I'd also point out that the dominant position for blue-chippers was OL, with 6 in the blue-chip index and 0 in the non-blue-chip group. Since this position group is a strength of Mario's recruiting, this bodes well for us. Where Miami definitely needs to improve its blue-chip recruiting is at the skill positions of QB, WR, and CB (I would argue that Miami has been historically and recently good at getting RBs, even if we've had some injury issues in the last year). Also, those positions are going to continue to demand a disproportionate amount of NIL attention, as some of our top targets recently were Rashada, Innis, and McClain.

As I said, very good analysis of the non-blue-chip guys, though I tend to disagree on the "recruiting services getting better" takeaway. There's certainly a lot more tape available, there are lots of camps and 7-on-7 stuff, but there are three diluted ranking services (since on3 poached a bunch of 247 guys) and lots of differences of opinion. What might be interesting to monitor is whether 7-on-7 flag football distorts the rankings for WR & CB, since there is no tackling involved and less overall physicality. In this first round, there were 4 non-blue-chip WR/CB guys (when you include the kid who grew into a TE), and 5 blue-chip WR/CB guys.

Bottom line, Miami needs to reach the level of Alabama/UGa/Ohio Taint/Clemson.
No lies found here. Great response to a well written post. Great job fellas!
 
One thing I like to do after every draft is go back and study the first rounders ranked three stars or below out of high school. There are less every year, as recruiting rankings continue to improve. But this exercise helps spot trends and mistakes. Let’s start with a pair of South Florida three stars:

Calijah Kancey, DT, Pittsburgh, 86.52 rating (Miami, FL)

Miami passed on Kancey because of size. I liked him, but my comps (Keir Thomas, Nikita Whitlock) underplayed his talent. His wingspan was the biggest concern.

Two takeaways. First, South Florida kids often make leaps in strength programs because they come in underdeveloped. Kancey tested poorly in high school and weighed 260. By the time he left college, he weighed 281 pounds and ran in the 4.6s.

Second, always pay attention to front seven players who play skill positions on offense. That is common among future first rounders. This is my report from the spring of Kancey's junior year:





Zay Flowers, Boston College (85.07 rating, Ft. Lauderdale, FL)

Flowers was my guy because of his pure football ability. He was just as good on defense as offense, with explosive striking ability, timing and instincts. His recruitment was strange because he wasn't hidden- he played with two big-name recruits and produced on the field. His senior highlight was almost 15 minutes long. My takeaway is that we need more football players at WR. Very few of our signees played both ways, and aside from Restrepo (who played everything), there is a lack of toughness on Saturdays.

This was my writeup on Flowers as a junior (I think he made the right decision staying on offense):




Devon Witherspoon, CB, Illinois (Unranked, Pensacola, FL)

On one hand, this is your classic "slip-through-the-cracks" situation. Witherspoon didn't play football until his junior year and he didn't qualify until after Signing Day. But if a Big Ten team can find him in Florida, that means their personnel department did a better job than ours. Everything you saw at Illinois is on his 10-minute senior reel: elite ball skills, striking like a LB, a sixth sense to diagnose and trigger. And he was named player of the year in the Panhandle. Maybe speed was a question mark (11.29 100M) but he was competitive in the high jump (6'7) and there were no speed issues on tape.

The takeaways: 1) Always pay attention to basketball converts who develop at a fast pace. That trajectory tends to continue in college; 2) Don't stop working in the summer. Some of our legendary players like Ray Lewis and Jeremy Shockey signed in the summer. I'd bet we didn't even watch Witherspoon's film.



Lukas Van Ness, DL, Iowa (85.3 rating, Chicago Suburbs, IL)

Every year, Iowa and Wisconsin produce three-star freaks that fit the same high school profile: Tall, multisport Midwesterners with room to grow. Van Ness was a hockey player (defender) through high school and went from 240 to 272 in Iowa's strength program. His athleticism isn't obvious on tape- he is straight-linish- but you can see his explosiveness with multiple blocked kicks. This is another story of an upward trajectory, as he didn't play varsity until his junior year.

If you're looking for someone who fits this profile in Miami's class, look no further than 6'6, Midwestern, hockey/lacrosse/track/basketball player Jackson Carver.



Jack Campbell, LB, Iowa (87.41 rating, Cedar Falls, IA)

See above. Campbell's sport was basketball, as the leading rebounder for the state champions. He is a clear beneficiary of the Iowa weight room, going from a lanky 210 all the way to 249 pounds at the combine. Surprisingly, he doesn't play offense or rush the passer despite his athleticism. It's all linebacker. He does show off his prowess on special teams, blocking multiple kicks and competing like a madman on kickoff.



Will McDonald IV, EDGE, Iowa State (86.14 rating, Milwaukee, WI)

McDonald is another tall, multisport Midwesterner who bulked up in college. He was always a basketball player (18/12) and knew nothing about football until he joined the team as a junior. He also lettered in baseball and track, finishing first in state in the discus (179 feet, 9 inches), third in the high jump (6'4) and setting personal bests in the 110-hurdles (15.53), long jump (22'4) and shot put (47'1.25).

His tape has all the hallmarks of a front seven first rounder: blocked kicks, big plays as a skill player, and high effort on kickoff. And his ability to bend was already special, resulting in 20 TFLs and 12.5 sacks.


Deonte Banks, CB, Maryland (86.48 rating, Baltimore, MD)

Two things stand out with Banks: verified track speed and two-way dominance. He was a beast on the track, with strong times in the 100M (10.98), 200M (22.44) and outstanding 22'8 long jump. And that speed translated to offense, where he ran for 1,700 rushing yards (15 ypc) and 24 TDs. People get mad when we talk about moving playmakers to defense, but this is what first rounders look like. His 11+ minute HL is mostly offense, although you see flashes of striking ability on defense and a few INTs.


Dalton Kincaid, TE, Utah (Unranked, Las Vegas, NV)

Like Witherspoon and McDonald, Kincaid was a basketball player who did not start playing football until late in his high school career. He played WR, signed with San Diego, switched to tight end and made third-team FCS All-American (835 yards, 19 ypc, 8 TDs). Josh Allen and Aaron Rodgers followed similar paths: nobody found them on the West Coast, they went to JUCOs for exposure and then signed with D1 schools. The last guy we signed like that was Beau Sandland, who didn't work here but ultimately got drafted by the Panthers.

Kincaid's high school clips show a surprisingly advanced receiver. He has a full array of routes, sinks his hips, plucks the ball and toe taps on the sideline. It's hard to understand how he ended up at San Diego.


Felix Anudike-Uzomah, DE, Kansas State (81.05 rating, Kansas City, MO)

Played basketball and participated in 4X200, shot put, javelin, long jump and triple jump. He almost went FCS and it took him a year to get on scholarship at Kansas State. His first step, balance, burst and motor are all there on the clips, but he's small. He added 45 pounds while keeping the motor and athleticism.


Tyree Wilson, DE, Texas Tech (88.13 rating, New London, TX)

Small-town Texas kid who was on recruiting radars but ultimately underrated. The first thing that stands out is the verified testing: he measured at 6'5.5, 230 in high school and ran 4.67 on the lasers. He also competed in sprint relays and the shot put (36'1). It's easy to see how that combo translates to defense. Wilson also played tight end. His highlights aren't available to the public, but the measurables alone tell a story.

So what are the common themes? All of these guys either played multiple sports, played both ways, or both. They competed hard and often blocked kicks on special teams. And they were all productive, even if they were raw.

This is a lot of sleepers who were selected in the 1st round. Which means a lot of misses by a lot of colleges. Or it means it’s really, really hard to predict which senior in high school has the necessary tangible and intangible qualities to play professional football.
 
Not just Carver, the majority of our ‘23 class are multi sport or play/played multiple positions at one point.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top